Great one-liners from PF members

[sysprog]

We don't allow ill-formed thread starts here. Thank you. ##-## @berkeman

 

[pinball1970]

@PeroK . Omicron reaches Antarctica!

@BillTre Chilling news!

 

[sysprog]

When the 5V capacitor explodes, scares you, and you try to get away, you don't want to trip and hit your head on the network analyzer cart. ##-## @DaveE

 

[berkeman]

You left off the last part...

Network analyzers are expensive.

 

[jbriggs444]

And ever since the 13th amendment, you can't even buy us. Only rent.

 

[sysprog]

And ever since the 13th amendment, you can't even buy us. Only rent.

Who said (appx) that?

 

[jbriggs444]

Who said (appx) that?

To explain the joke...

A "network analyzer" is an entity which analyzes networks in much the same way that a computer is an entity which computes. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_(occupation)

By this definition, I am a network analyzer. The 13th amendment to the U.S. constitution states:

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

So (tongue in cheek and barring the existence of a chain gang in the machine room), if you fall backward onto a human network analyzer, he is not company property but is likely rented for wages.

 

[sysprog]

Thanks, @jbriggs444

 

[strangerep]

A "network analyzer" is an entity which analyzes networks in much the same way that a computer is an entity which computes. [...]

I avoided becoming a network analyzer because the modern internet was making it more and more like this guy's job.

 

[sysprog]

Mathematics may appear subjective to those who don't take the time to learn it. ##-## @PeroK

 

[PeroK]

Mathematics may appear subjective to those who don't take the time to learn it. ##-## @PeroK

I must be honest, I was quite pleased with that one myself!

 

[fresh_42]

I must be honest, I was quite pleased with that one myself!

It can also appear subjective to those who took the time. Whether or not one accepts the continuum hypothesis might be a question only relevant for set theorists, but the axiom of choice decides over an entire branch: algebra. So all who do not believe in the axiom of choice will have a hard time in mathematics.

 

[pbuk]

So all who do not believe in the axiom of choice will have a hard time in mathematics.

But I thought you are a constructivist?

 

[fresh_42]

But I thought you are a constructivist?

I generally make decisions that maximize the number of options. I think this makes sense as it restricts possibilities only when necessary. However, my mathematical confession is rather conservative:

AC ##\checkmark##
CH ##\checkmark##
binary logic ##\checkmark##
reductio ad absurdum ##\checkmark##
Platonism ##\checkmark##

ERH ##\checkmark##
NP##\neq ##P ##\checkmark##

The last two until proven otherwise, but I doubt this will ever happen.

 

[valenumr]

I generally make decisions that maximize the number of options. I think this makes sense as it restricts possibilities only when necessary. However, my mathematical confession is rather conservative:

AC ##\checkmark##
CH ##\checkmark##
binary logic ##\checkmark##
reductio ad absurdum ##\checkmark##
Platonism ##\checkmark##

ERH ##\checkmark##
NP##\neq ##P ##\checkmark##

The last two until proven otherwise, but I doubt this will ever happen.

My uneducated guess is that ERH is true, but not P=NP. In any case, maybe your latex on the last point isn't rendering properly.

 

[fresh_42]

My uneducated guess is that ERH is true, but not P=NP. In any case, maybe your latex on the last point isn't rendering properly.

Had been sloppiness on my side.

 

[valenumr]

View attachment 274912

I'm just finding this thread, but that is awesome. They totally should have used cubits.

 

[valenumr]

Had been sloppiness on my side.

You're latex was fine. My eyesight however...

 

[fresh_42]

You're latex was fine. My eyesight however...

Nothing wrong with your eyesight. I corrected the post while you were typing. I often see mistakes not before the final version can be seen, i.e. after "send". The preview is of no help since it alters the edit box. In an earlier version of the software, we had the edit and preview box in parallel which was much better. Now it is an either or so I often push "send" and correct it afterward.

 

[valenumr]

Nothing wrong with your eyesight. I corrected the post while you were typing. I often see mistakes not before the final version can be seen, i.e. after "send". The preview is of no help since it alters the edit box. In an earlier version of the software, we had the edit and preview box in parallel which was much better. Now it is an either or so I often push "send" and correct it afterward.

I am terrible at if printing typos. Or also conveying coherent thoughts. A preview would be nice, but I'd likely not pay it notice

 

[valenumr]

I don't understand the fuss. I've measured them before with a tachyometer.

I observed them many years ago with the tachometer a designed many years from now.

 

[valenumr]

When the 5V capacitor explodes, scares you, and you try to get away, you don't want to trip and hit your head on the network analyzer cart. ##-## @DaveE

In my younger days, I attempted to "troubleshoot" a very large camera flash. The capacitor discharge was, uh, stimulating.

 

[valenumr]

It can also appear subjective to those who took the time. Whether or not one accepts the continuum hypothesis might be a question only relevant for set theorists, but the axiom of choice decides over an entire branch: algebra. So all who do not believe in the axiom of choice will have a hard time in mathematics.

Don't forget incompleteness!

 

[fresh_42]

Don't forget incompleteness!

I don't bother completeness. I simply change to the next meta-level.

 

[valenumr]

It can also appear subjective to those who took the time. Whether or not one accepts the continuum hypothesis might be a question only relevant for set theorists, but the axiom of choice decides over an entire branch: algebra. So all who do not believe in the axiom of choice will have a hard time in mathematics.

I thought it was the case that one implied the other, at least almost, but I can't remember which direction. Either way, my "gut" tells me that there is nothing between the set of integers and the set of reals.

 

[sysprog]

(whisper) Hey guys, there's plenty of room for discussion in re the axiom of choice and the continuum hypothesis available elsewhere on PF; thanks for not continuing those topics here.

 

[sysprog]

I don't understand it. I just quote experts. ##-## @Hornbein

 

[DrClaude]

Two lines, but it made me laugh

I come from quantum computing, where measurement is *extremely* well delineated. In your circuit diagrams, it's the box that has an M in it .

 

[berkeman]

The only accurate visualization of curved spacetime I know is to just look out at the real universe.

 

[Tom.G]

More like a Spoonerism... but worth a chuckle.

From a thread on Covid Variant Omicron (B1.1.529).

I would like greater availability of the Pfizer pill, which is 90% effective at parenting death.

 

[sysprog]

The self defeating mindset is really a problem. If you don't believe it, you'll most likely not going to pass. ##-## @0kelvin

 

[sysprog]

Yes, one can add riptides, sharp rocks, 'rogue' waves, cold water, strong currents, kelp tangles, live and dead jellyfish, oil and sewer spills, stoned surfers and boogey boarders, and sociopathic yachtsmen firing guns near shore to the dangers of open ocean swimming. ##-## @Klystron

 

[sysprog]

It would be pretty ironic if I had accidentally used the word “deliberately”. ##-# @Dale

 

[sysprog]

Why don't you calculate the escape velocity of the Moon from that and check online to see whether you are right? ##-## @PeroK

 

[Vanadium 50]

Writing your question with the erroneous assumption in bold is not going to make the assumption true.