- #71
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2023 Award
- 33,427
- 19,973
Please! Have some class!fresh_42 said:I assume cat pee is universal.
It's 'cat whiz'.
Please! Have some class!fresh_42 said:I assume cat pee is universal.
Oh shush, you.WWGD said:They brought me some fish, and it was raw!
Most of the Library threads aren't InsightsAstronuc said:Any takers on this one?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-the-coulomb-gauge.763088/
If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Apparently, the post is an entry is from our old Library feature. I miss that feature.
And another Library entry: What is susceptibility?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-susceptibility.763178/
Did some of this material get put into an Insight article?
No offense to you but this comment is not helpful to me. If you think the response is a problem, report it and have the mods decide if they want to delete it. Or respond to it yourself.dextercioby said:https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/fermi-distribution-of-3s-electrons-of-sodium.295589/
No offense meant towards the responder, but coming 13 years later with no clear-cut answer is not helpful for our (external) readers.
How about simply clicking on "report" and saying why it should be deleted?DaveE said:How about adding another column to the spreadsheet for us to check for broken links, incomplete information, etc. so we can flag questions for the moderators to review/delete?
Alternatively we could just reply by asking for more information. It's kind of frustrating to open a question, decide that it can't really be answered, and then leave it there for someone else to do the same thing.
Yeah, I've done that on a couple of them.fresh_42 said:How about simply clicking on "report" and saying why it should be deleted?
Oops, I didn't see that. You just can't get good help these days, LOL.fresh_42 said:How about simply clicking on "report" and saying why it should be deleted?
And I deleted them. (Except one, IIRC. I merged one with an existing longer discussion.)phinds said:Yeah, I've done that on a couple of them.
I checked them whenever I saw one.mfb said:The actual number of remaining threads is smaller, there are many answers where threads haven't been checked in the document.
Good idea. Matlab alone has had 34 entries.mfb said:Should we move questions that need specialized knowledge to a second sheet and sort by topic? Otherwise multiple people might open the same thread only to realize they can't help there. That's not an issue for e.g. simple mechanics questions, but if you need to be familiar with a specific software or something like that it would save some time.
mfb said:Should we move questions that need specialized knowledge to a second sheet and sort by topic?
I added all 31 MATLAB subjects. I have no knowledge in the field but I saw that @jedishrfu answered one with a specific video. Maybe he knows a video course, or youtube channel that answers all, or at least many of them.Greg Bernhardt said:Down to near 200!
I added another column where we can include the topic if the reviewer is not feeling confident answering and thinks someone with a certain skill is required.
google sheets link
I can reach out to @kreil who is a MATLAB expertfresh_42 said:I added all 31 MATLAB subjects. I have no knowledge in the field but I saw that @jedishrfu answered one with a specific video. Maybe he knows a video course, or youtube channel that answers all, or at least many of them.
It's even worse: it is not a constant shift. Someone sorted along the "subjects" column without sorting all of it.TeethWhitener said:Did the links get misaligned with the titles on the google sheet?
Sorry, I think it was me. I restored the version from this morning (9:17 AM Pacific) where everything was aligned, so if you marked any threads as done after that time, you may need to mark it again.fresh_42 said:It's even worse: it is not a constant shift. Someone sorted along the "subjects" column without sorting all of it.
I'm trying to figure how to relate these two to other threads/posts. The subjects definitely show up in other threads/posts, and as old Library entries or FAQs, they are essentially stand-alone posts.Astronuc said:Any takers on this one?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-the-coulomb-gauge.763088/
If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Apparently, the post is an entry is from our old Library feature. I miss that feature.
And another Library entry: What is susceptibility?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/what-is-susceptibility.763178/
Did some of this material get put into an Insight article?
I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.Greg Bernhardt said:For the two FAQ library threads, maybe there is a concept or explanation that someone can expand on, or are they pretty well perfect?
That may actually spark some replies from the community too just with the bumpfresh_42 said:I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.
That's what I had in mind.fresh_42 said:I simply added a comment with the recommendation link to an existing Insight article each.
We also have an Insights article on Demystifying Bernoulli's equation.gmax137 said:I posted a reply to this one:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/air-pressure-with-bernoullis-equation.144674/post-6652812
The OP is asking about specific problems in a cited textbook; I punted to "other Bernoulli threads." I hope that is OK.
Yeah linking to a relevant Insight is a good idea and easy!Astronuc said:That's what I had in mind.
Less than 140 based on Greg's comment in post #96 in this thread.dlgoff said:@Greg Bernhardt
Just curious. How many unanswered threads are there now?
Thanks @AstronucAstronuc said:Less than 140 based on Greg's comment in post #96 in this thread.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ction-of-0-reply-threads.1016551/post-6652804