Obviously we reference material published in news and other media sources, but if a specific and obscure, new, or otherwise generally unknown theory [not common knowledge] is to be used as a scientific explanation for a phenomenon, then either the theory must be found in a paper published in a journal listed at the links below, or the poster must demonstrate that the source is an applicable peer-reviewed journal recognized by the mainstream academic community.
http://scientific.thomson.com/index.html
If you have problems with the search feature, you can view the entire list here.
http://www.thomsonscientific.com/cgi...cgi?PC=MASTER
Ivan Seeking said:Thanks Wolram, but has that paper been published?
From the posting guidelines
Ball lightning is a naturally occurring phenomenon that appears as a glowing sphere of light that hovers in the air. It is often associated with thunderstorms, but can also occur in clear skies.
The new theory for ball lightning suggests that it is caused by the combustion of silicon particles in the atmosphere. These particles are created when lightning strikes the ground and vaporizes the soil.
Previous theories proposed that ball lightning was a type of plasma or a form of electromagnetic radiation. However, the new theory focuses on the chemical reaction of silicon particles, which can better explain the observed behavior of ball lightning.
Yes, this theory can be tested by conducting experiments in a controlled environment to recreate the conditions that produce ball lightning. The chemical reactions and behaviors of the silicon particles can then be observed and studied.
If this theory is proven to be true, it could lead to a better understanding of ball lightning and potentially help predict and prevent its occurrence. It could also have implications for other atmospheric phenomena and the study of lightning in general.