- #1
hankaaron
- 83
- 4
I saw "Interstellar"in IMAX. Fantastic visuals, but lazy dumb writing and very bad basic physics. Kip Thorne should be embarrassed to have is name so prominently associated with the movie.
hankaaron said:I saw "Interstellar"in IMAX. Fantastic visuals, but lazy dumb writing and very bad basic physics. Kip Thorne should be embarrassed to have is name so prominently associated with the movie.
Doug Huffman said:Do you have criticism of specific points which are not constrained by the medium?
Man, that's disappointing. Looks like it's just Prometheus all over again.hankaaron said:I don't think I could provide a better critique than this review:
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...vie_s_black_holes_wormholes_relativity.2.html
What do you mean? Should we cite only peer reviewed papers from reputable journals when talking about movies?Doug Huffman said:So, Slate is somehow equivalent or appropriate to PF?
KrisOhn said:This is very disappointing, I was very excited to go see the movie in its full IMAX glory. Oh well...
Yes, I know what you mean. I liked Prometheus somewhat right after seeing it. But the more I thought about it... yikes! I completely disliked Interstellar when I left the theater. In fact during the "wrestling match" scene I consider walking out of the IMAX theater.Bandersnatch said:Man, that's disappointing. Looks like it's just Prometheus all over again.
hankaaron said:I don't think I could provide a better critique than this review:
http://www.slate.com/articles/healt...vie_s_black_holes_wormholes_relativity.2.html
Wait. What?Bandersnatch said:-no spaghettification
DaveC426913 said:But did assume that, when I heard they were talking black holes for travel, they would at least address the giant elephant - i.e. how you get through a black hole without spaghettification.
Sounds like more fun too. That's on my definite list.I'm a sucker for animation.DaveC426913 said:I'm going to push for 'Big Hero Six' instead. Prolly more scientifically accurate.
That's probably the most positive Big Hero Six review I've seen so far. :PDaveC426913 said:Wow. Wow. Wow.
Too much movie for one skull to hold...
I take back all the doubt I had. It has been a long long time since I have sat so slack-jawed in wide-eyed wonder in a movie theatre.
No, I know exactly how long it's been. Since Inception hit the theatres.
You could love this or you could hate it. It takes some risks, and for some they might be deal-breakers. But you shouldn't pass on it.
Heh.Bandersnatch said:That's probably the most positive Big Hero Six review I've seen so far. :p
DaveC426913 said:Wow. Wow. Wow.
Too much movie for one skull to hold...
I take back all the doubt I had. It has been a long long time since I have sat so slack-jawed in wide-eyed wonder in a movie theatre.
No, I know exactly how long it's been. Since Inception hit the theatres.
You could love this or you could hate it. It takes some risks, and for some they might be deal-breakers. But you shouldn't pass on it.
Bandersnatch said:Go away Drakkith and DaveC426913! This thread is a bonding experience for people who like bitching about movies so that we can feel superior.
We don't need your kind around here.
But seriously, would those of you who have seen it say it's a big screen-only experience? Sort of like Gravity, where it loses enough impact viewed on a small screen to feel bland?
It's certainly much better than Gravity. I think it's a "must see" in spite of the flaws, but you'll have to decide for yourself if you must see it now or if you must see it later. It depends on the answer to questions like:Bandersnatch said:Go away Drakkith and DaveC426913! This thread is a bonding experience for people who like bitching about movies so that we can feel superior.
We don't need your kind around here.
And you, DaveC426914... you played us with your false promises. "Oh, I'mma going to see a cartoon instead!", "Sphaghettification grumble grumble".
We trusted you. We were invested in your vitriol. You're like that conservative 13 year old who turned liberal as soon as he grew up a few inches and started shaving. Shame on you.But seriously, would those of you who have seen it say it's a big screen-only experience? Sort of like Gravity, where it loses enough impact viewed on a small screen to feel bland?
I had the same idea last night. And I would have if the LSU-Alabama game wasn't on last night (which btw, was another classic).jshrager said:I'm going to watch 2001 again sometime soon to clear my nausea.
Wait, what? The real problem isn't with the science, but the science was (way) off? What the hell is that supposed to mean?Plait
The real problem isn’t with the science, it’s with the story. I’m sure Thorne knew the science was (way) off, but I can guess that director and screenwriter Christopher Nolan chose to ignore those issues in order to advance his story.
Thorne
Science: Is there anywhere the moviemakers strayed outside your guidelines?
Thorne: Not seriously. The one place where I am the least comfortable is on [a] planet where they have these ice clouds. These structures go beyond what I think the material strength of ice would be able to support. But I’d say if that’s the most egregious violation of physical law, they’ve done very, very well. There’s some artistic license there.
Followup: Interstellar Mea Culpa
Phil Plait
Every now and again, I screw up. Sometimes it’s small, sometimes it’s big, and I try to admit it when I do. It helps you, the reader, understand things better when I ‘fess up, and it keeps me honest. Also, after all, science is all about admitting mistakes and learning from them!
...
Spoilers ahoy! I have to reveal critical plot points about the movie, so if you haven’t seen it and wish your viewing experience to remain pristine, then you should stop here.
...