A question about optical theorem

In summary: This is not what the theorem says.It says that in the forward direction the forward scattering amplitude is zero, but the total cross section is nonzero.
  • #1
ndung200790
519
0
Optical theorem says that total cross section proportion to elastic scattering amplitude in the forward direction.Then if the target is absolutely reflective ''mirror''(in the case of quantum mechanics:scattering potential=infinity(r<a) and de Broglie wave leng limits to 0),in this case the scattering amplitude in forward direction is zero,but the total cross section is nonzero (because of reflection).So I do not understand the optical theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In wave optics the forward scattering amplitude is never zero. I.e. even behind some metallic mirror (in the distance of several hundred meters) a bright spot will appear in the shadow zone.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arago_spot
 
Last edited:
  • #3
And what about in the case of quantum mechanics?And in optics the thicker metalic mirror the smaller the total cross section?Because the thicker mirror the weaker the forward scattering.
 
  • #4
Now,I understand that it is not only because tunneling through barrier,but also because diffraction making the spot after mirror.
 
  • #5
But in case incident flux having diameter of the beam is very small comparision with diameter of the ''mirror'' and in classical limit(de Broglie wave leng tends to zero) and the momentum of particle is absolutely defined.So I think that having only reflection,but not having diffraction,then in this case there were not Arago spot?
 
  • #6
ndung200790 said:
But in case incident flux having diameter of the beam is very small comparision with diameter of the ''mirror''

I think the optical theorem refers to an incident plane wave. If the diameter of the incident beam is restricted, then you first have to decompose it in a plane wave basis.
 
  • #7
In case the diameter of mirror large enough(the region of scattering potential),then we can consider the incident flux is plane wave despite of the diameter of incident beam is narrower than that of mirror(and in classical limit).In this case,with unitary property of S matrix we deduce the optical theorem.Then we are led to the transfer amplitude allways exists,despite of the scattering potential limits to infinity?
 

Related to A question about optical theorem

1. What is the optical theorem?

The optical theorem is a principle in physics that relates the scattering and absorption of light by a medium to the total cross-section of the medium.

2. How is the optical theorem used in research?

The optical theorem is used in research to analyze the properties of materials and to develop mathematical models for predicting the behavior of light in different media.

3. What is the significance of the optical theorem in optics?

The optical theorem is significant in optics because it provides a fundamental understanding of how light interacts with matter, which is crucial in the design and development of optical devices and systems.

4. Can the optical theorem be applied to other fields of science?

Yes, the optical theorem has been applied to various fields of science, including acoustics, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics, to study the scattering and absorption of different types of waves by different types of media.

5. Are there any limitations to the optical theorem?

Yes, the optical theorem is based on certain assumptions and simplifications, and therefore it may not accurately predict the behavior of light in complex or highly structured media.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
6
Views
877
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top