Recent content by The Rev

  1. T

    Is a Planet-Dissolving Chaos Cloud Really Headed Towards Earth?

    Does anyone know anything about this? http://tv.yahoo.com/news/wwn/20050912/112653720001.html I'd love to hear what people who know what they're talking about, physics-wise, have to say about this. \phi The Rev
  2. T

    Indeterminate Forms in Limits: Can Dividing by Itself Equal 1?

    Well, he lost me at Lagrangian, but I did get the feeling that renormalization isn't about cancelling out infinities with simple division. (I know nothing of this higher level math, yet.) I was impressed, however, that singer Joan Baez is also an expert on Quantum Mechanics. \psi
  3. T

    Indeterminate Forms in Limits: Can Dividing by Itself Equal 1?

    Is this how they cancel out infinities in renormalization in QM?
  4. T

    Indeterminate Forms in Limits: Can Dividing by Itself Equal 1?

    Is it a reasonable statement to say either: 1) \frac{\infty}{\infty} = 1 ? 2) \frac{0}{0} = 1 ? \phi The Rev
  5. T

    Matrices in more than 2 dimensions

    Tensors, eh? Well, that's a ways off. Thanks! \psi The Rev
  6. T

    Matrices in more than 2 dimensions

    I was thinking of a matrix like the one above, with rows and columns (x & y vertices) AND some kind of z vertex (depths?) so the matrix formed a cube instead of a square (or a hypercube, etc.). Is this what you mean? (I'm inferring from your post that you're a few textbooks ahead of where I am...
  7. T

    Are Bobs Really the Nicest Guys? Debunking the Theory of No Evil Bobs

    What about Beelzebob? :smile: The Rev
  8. T

    Are You an Inside the Box or Outside the Box Thinker?

    But few means. I run into the same thing. When I ask a question, often the answer is more descriptive than creative, and I get the impression that many people here do not ask themselves anything really off the wall about their areas of expertise. \psi The Rev
  9. T

    Matrices in more than 2 dimensions

    I've been learning about 2D matrices in algebra, like the one below, and was wondering if there were matrices in higher maths that used 3 or more dimensions, and if someone would describe or provide an example. Just curious. \left[\begin{array}{ccc}1&0&0\\0&1&0\\0&0&1\end{array}\right]...
  10. T

    When you solve a problem incorrectly, what's the usual culprit?

    If we could work \phi and \frac{1}{137} in there somehow, we might have the meaning of life. (Wouldn't it be cool if the resulting equation solved to 42?) -0 The Rev
  11. T

    When you solve a problem incorrectly, what's the usual culprit?

    No, sorry. I just love elegant stuff like that, so I place it between the end of my post and my name. It's a self-indulgence thing. \phi The Rev
  12. T

    When you solve a problem incorrectly, what's the usual culprit?

    When you solve a problem incorrectly, what's the usual culprit? Is it a "stupid mistake" (such as accidentally adding when you should have subtracted, etc.) or is it a misapplication of a skill? For myself, as I go along in my learning, whenever I get into trouble in an equation, 9 times out...
  13. T

    How should -x^2 be treated in graphing equations?

    Thanks for the clarification! \phi The Rev
  14. T

    How should -x^2 be treated in graphing equations?

    I'm graphing equations, and I ran into a snag. I assumed that the graph would be the same for both of the following: y=x^2 and y=-x^2 since any negative number squared is equal to it's absolute value squared. However, the book showed equation 2 as having an inverted graph of equation...
Back
Top