- #1
physicss
- 25
- 4
- Homework Statement
- Hello, what does this expression mean?
- Relevant Equations
- (Picture)
I already solved w x x/|x|
For (w1,w2,w3) and (x1,x2,x3)
For (w1,w2,w3) and (x1,x2,x3)
Then you just have to take the partial derivative wrt ##x_i## and again wrt ##x_j##.physicss said:Homework Statement: Hello, what does this expression mean?
Relevant Equations: (Picture)
I already solved w x x/|x|
For (w1,w2,w3) and (x1,x2,x3) View attachment 327170
Thanks for the answer. Would xi and xj be x1 and x2 in this case?haruspex said:Then you just have to take the partial derivative wrt ##x_i## and again wrt ##x_j##.
No. Because the function is symmetric in the three parameters, you can replace them with ##x_i##, ##x_j##, ##x_k##, where it is understood that {i,j,k}={1,2,3}, but which is which is unspecified.physicss said:Thanks for the answer. Would xi and xj be x1 and x2 in this case?
Thank youharuspex said:No. Because the function is symmetric in the three parameters, you can replace them with ##x_i##, ##x_j##, ##x_k##, where it is understood that {i,j,k}={1,2,3}, but which is which is unspecified.
For example, suppose you had the function ##x_1x_2x_3## then its partial derivative wrt ##x_i## and ##x_j## would be ##x_k##.
Edit, you might also need to assume that i, j, k are in the same cyclic order as 1, 2, 3.
Edit 2: Just realised my posts may be off the mark. I need to solve it myself first.
Edit 3:
Rereading the question, I see it does not refer to indices 1, 2, 3. That is something you assumed. So my correct answer to your post #3 is:
Yes, they are using i, j, k as the indices, not 1, 2, 3.