Ward-Takahashi identity and renormalization

In summary, the Ward-Takahashi identity in quantum field theory (specifically for local Abelian gauge symmetries) is necessary for the renormalizability of the theory. It ensures that quantum fluctuations do not break gauge invariance, thus allowing for the cancellation of divergent parts of amplitudes at a given order of perturbation theory. In the case of non-Abelian gauge theories like the standard model, the Higgs mechanism allows for mass without breaking gauge invariance. However, in the Abelian case, the Stückelberg model can also provide mass while maintaining local gauge invariance, as shown by Kroll, Lee, and Zumino.
  • #1
samuelr85
5
0
What I don't understand about WT identity is how it allows or helps you to renormalize a quantum field theory (es. QED). Not in details, just the basic ideas, if possible.
Thanks in advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I'm not entirely sure but I've heard that a massive spin one field is non-renormalizable. The gauge symmetry of the photon "protects" the photon from being non-renormalizable. The Ward-Takahashi identity says that gauge invariance is preserved at the quantum level. So I guess the Ward-Takahashi identity tells you that quantum fluctuations don't break gauge invariance and hence the renormalizability of the theory.
 
  • #3
Thanks for your answer, it make sense. Do you think you need to explicitly use the WT identities for showing that the divergent parts of the amplitudes cancel each other, at a given order of perturbation theory? Or that cancellation is it just a consequence of the presence of gauge invariance?
 
  • #4
Indeed, the Ward-Takahashi identities for local Abelian gauge symmetries are necessary for the Dyson renormalizability of such theories like QED. E.g., from naive power counting the four-photon vertex is logarithmically divergent. However, the WTI for this vertex ensures that it is finite. For details, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/lect.pdf

It is also not true that massive vector fields lead necessarily to non-renormalizable models. E.g., the standard model is renormalizable although the W- and Z-bosons are massive. This is due to the fact that this theory is still a non-Abelian gauge theory, i.e., the action is invariant under local gauge transformations, but this local symmetry is spontaneously broken. This provides mass to the gauge bosons without breaking gauge invariance, and thus the theory stays renormalizable. This Higgs mechanism predicts the existence of a massive scalar boson, the famous Higgs boson.

For the Abelian case, one can give the gauge boson even a mass by hand (i.e., without using spontaneous symmetry breaking of the local gauge symmetry), and still keep the theory invariant under local gauge transformations. This is the Stückelberg model, rediscovered by Kroll, Lee, and Zumino to build an effective renormalizable theory for the (neutral) light vector mesons, [itex]\rho, \quad \omega[/itex], and [itex]\phi[/itex]:

Kroll, N. M., Lee, T. D., and Zumino, B.: Neutral Vector Mesons and the Hadronic Electromagnetic Current , Phys. Rev. 157, volume 157, 1376, 1967
 

Related to Ward-Takahashi identity and renormalization

What is the Ward-Takahashi identity?

The Ward-Takahashi identity is a mathematical relationship between the correlation functions of a quantum field theory. It ensures that the theory is gauge invariant, meaning that the physical predictions of the theory do not depend on the choice of gauge. It is a fundamental principle in quantum field theory and plays a crucial role in understanding the behavior of particles and forces at the microscopic level.

How does the Ward-Takahashi identity relate to renormalization?

The Ward-Takahashi identity is closely related to the process of renormalization in quantum field theory. Renormalization is a mathematical technique used to remove infinities that arise in certain calculations in quantum field theory. The Ward-Takahashi identity is used to ensure that the renormalization process preserves gauge invariance, which is essential for making meaningful predictions about the behavior of particles and forces.

Why is the Ward-Takahashi identity important in quantum field theory?

The Ward-Takahashi identity is important because it is a fundamental principle that ensures the consistency and validity of quantum field theories. Gauge invariance is a crucial concept in modern physics and the Ward-Takahashi identity provides a powerful mathematical tool for understanding and maintaining gauge invariance in quantum field theories.

What are the consequences of violating the Ward-Takahashi identity?

If the Ward-Takahashi identity is violated, it means that the theory does not possess gauge invariance. This can lead to inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the theory's predictions about the behavior of particles and forces. Violation of the Ward-Takahashi identity can also indicate a fundamental flaw in the underlying principles of the theory, which would require further investigation and refinement.

How is the Ward-Takahashi identity tested in experiments?

The Ward-Takahashi identity is a purely mathematical relationship between correlation functions, so it cannot be directly tested in experiments. However, it is an essential part of the theoretical framework of quantum field theory and its predictions have been extensively tested and verified through experimental observations in particle accelerators and other high-energy experiments. Any violations of the Ward-Takahashi identity would be reflected in discrepancies between the theoretical predictions and experimental results.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
57
Views
5K
Back
Top