Scientific publications: Readers reviews and comments

In summary, scientific publications often include reader reviews and comments, which can provide valuable insights and critiques of the research presented. These reviews and comments are typically written by experts in the field and can help to improve the quality and accuracy of the published work. They also serve as a form of peer review, ensuring that the research meets the standards of the scientific community. However, not all publications allow for reader comments, and those that do may have strict guidelines for submission and moderation. Overall, reader reviews and comments play an important role in the scientific publication process, promoting transparency and facilitating further discussion and advancement in the field.
  • #1
lalbatros
1,256
2
Hello,

I you plan to buy a book on Amazon, you can read comments by previous readers.
These comments, together with the book preview, are quite useful.
At the least, reviews could decrease the risk of a wrong purchase or of a waste of time.

Wouldn't it be useful to also have the opportunity to read comments by previous readers?

I would be interrested to know if there have already been such initiatives on the web,
and what you would think about that?

Thanks,

Michel
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The http://f1000.com/tour is one such initiative. Several thousand researchers and clinicians from around the world review published papers and rank them.
 

Related to Scientific publications: Readers reviews and comments

1. What is the purpose of readers reviews and comments on scientific publications?

The purpose of readers reviews and comments is to provide feedback and critique on the quality and accuracy of the scientific publication. It allows for a peer-review process and helps to improve the overall credibility and impact of the research.

2. How do readers reviews and comments impact the scientific community?

Readers reviews and comments play a crucial role in the scientific community as they help to identify any flaws or errors in the research, provide constructive criticism, and contribute to the ongoing discussion and development of ideas in the field.

3. Are readers reviews and comments considered as a form of scientific evidence?

No, readers reviews and comments are not considered as a form of scientific evidence. They are opinions and critiques based on the reader's understanding and interpretation of the research, and should not be treated as empirical data.

4. How can readers reviews and comments be used by authors and publishers?

Authors and publishers can use readers reviews and comments to improve the quality of their research and publications. They can also be used as a tool for self-reflection and to identify potential areas for further research.

5. Are readers reviews and comments public or confidential?

Readers reviews and comments are typically public, as they are often published alongside the scientific publication. However, some journals may allow for confidential reviews, where the identity of the reviewer is not disclosed to the author.

Similar threads

Book Review: Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men
    • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
1K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
    • General Discussion
Replies
12
Views
1K
Methods for assessing textbook quality -- Expert opinions needed
    • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
30
Views
969
Should the public know what you are thinking and concluding?
    • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
1K
Has anyone read "Willful Ignorance" by Herbert Weisberg?
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
2K
Defending Science Against Ongoing Threats: Why the Scientific Method Matters
    • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
1K
Buy and Hold Beats Active Investing
    • General Discussion
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
Discussion of PF Policy on Valid References
    • Feedback and Announcements
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Looking for good intro science books. I'm thinking Kaku?
    • General Discussion
2
Replies
45
Views
3K
Fact checking - Scientific method
    • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top