Physics Problem Help: Find Total Force on Q4

[suf7]

Physics Problem!..Help!

Can sum1 pleez help me with this problem?...i really don't have a clue?...i don't unsterstand what is the correct method to use?...need help!

Three point charges are situated on the x-axis of a co-ordinate system.
Q1 = +2.0 nC is +0.05m from the origin
Q2 = -3.0 nC is + 0.1m from the origin
Q3 = -10.0 nC is -0.1m from the origin
What is the total force exerted by the three charges on a fourth charge “Q4 = +5.0 nC is situated at the origin??...1 nC = 10-9C

 

[arildno]

Forces are additive.
So you must find out:
1) What is the magnitude and direction of the force from Q1 on Q4?
2) What is the magnitude and direction of the force from Q2 on Q4?
3) What is the magnitude and direction of the force from Q3 on Q4?
4) Then add the results from 1),2),3) together
5) Remember:
Whatever forces Q1,Q2,Q3 imparts ON EACH OTHER has NO RELEVANCE to the forces they impart on Q4!

 

[Nylex]

Use Coulomb's law to find the force acting on Q4 exerted by each of the other charges. The total force exerted on Q4 is given by the sum of those 3 forces.

 

[suf7]

Sorry but I am really lost?...could you show me how to work out the first part?
What is the magnitude and direction of the force from Q1 on Q4?

ive never been shown any method for working these questions out, my teacher jus gives us the answers?...i just need to know what steps to take and how to achieve an answer?

 

[arildno]

State Coulomb's law, please.

 

[suf7]

force between two stationary point charges?

 

[arildno]

Precisely!

 

[suf7]

i know that's the law, i just don't know how to apply it?

 

[arildno]

Okay then, let's start at my 1)

Set up Coulomb's law to calculate the force from Q1 on Q4!

 

[suf7]

but i don't know how to?..i been given some formulas but i don't know which is which and which1 to use??..im confused??..sorry!

 

[arildno]

Can you type in Coulomb's law, using Q1 and Q4 as your point charges?

 

[drnikitin]

Find forces (magnitude and direction) from each of the three charges on the fourth charge from Coulomb's law. Then add these forces taking into account their directions

 

[suf7]

is it this??

F = (Q1)(Q4)/4∏eor2

 

[suf7]

by the way how does nC come into all this?

 

[Nylex]

by the way how does nC come into all this?

nC = nano Coulombs. Charge is measured in Coulombs, so you need to convert your values into Coulombs (ie. multiply by 10^-9). The equation you have above for Coulomb's law was correct (assuming you mean r^2 on the bottom line).

 

[arildno]

That is correct, as long as you remember that the implied direction is AWAY from Q4.
On vector form, we have:
[tex]\vec{F}_{41}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{Q_{1}Q_{4}}{r_{41}^{2}}\frac{\vec{r}_{4}-\vec{r}_{1}}{r_{41}}[/tex]
EXPLANATIONS:
1)Here, I have included the last fraction to have the basic direction explicitly included.
2)[tex]\vec{F}_{41}[/tex] means: The force acting on Q4 from Q1
3) [tex]r_{41}[/tex] is the DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4, that is, some positive number.
CALCULATIONS:
Q1=2.0 nC
Q4=5.0 nC
Hence, [tex]Q1*Q4=10.0(nC)^{2}[/tex]
[tex]\vec{r}_{4}=\vec{0}[/tex] (that is, situated at the origin)
[tex]\vec{r}_{1}= 0.05m\vec{i}[/tex]
(that is, situated 0.05m to the right-hand side of Q4 at the origin)
Hence, [tex]\vec{r}_{4}-\vec{r}_{1}=-0.05m\vec{i}[/tex]
That is, the direction indicated by this quantity is leftwards.

[tex]r_{41}=0.05m[/tex] that is the DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 is 0.05m

Collecting all together, we have:
[tex]\vec{F}_{41}=-\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{10.0(nC)^{2}}{(0.05m)^{2}}\vec{i}[/tex]

That is, the force on Q4 from Q1 is directed leftwards.
Q4 tends to be REPELLED from Q1, because they have EQUAL TYPE OF CHARGE!
Was this okay?

 

[suf7]

So is this right for the first point??

F = (Q1)(Q4)/4∏eor2
= (2*5) / (4∏)*(8.854*10^-12)*(2.5*10^-21)
= 3.597*10^31

the answer seems rather large?

 

[suf7]

thanks for that explanation..sorry, I am abit slow..lol..
But wats hapend to the 4pi??and Eo??..wat have i done wrong in my calculation?

 

[Nylex]

So is this right for the first point??

F = (Q1)(Q4)/4∏eor2
= (2*5) / (4∏)*(8.854*10^-12)*(2.5*10^-21)
= 3.597*10^31

the answer seems rather large?

Why are you using 2.5 x 10^-21 as the distance between the charges? Also remember to convert your charges into coulombs if you want your force in Newtons.

 

[arildno]

You should have (I include the sign (direction) for the force):
[tex]F=-\frac{10.0*10^{-18}C^{2}}{4\pi*\epsilon_{0}*2.5m^{2}*10^{-3}}[/tex]
If I understand your calculation correctly, you placed the [tex]10^{-18}[/tex] factor in your denominator, rather than in your numerator.

 

[suf7]

i thought r = 0.05nC for Q1 to Q4 so i did (0.05*10^-9)
thats how i got (2.5*10^-21)??..i don't know wat to do??
how is it wrong??..help!

 

[Nylex]

i thought r = 0.05nC for Q1 to Q4 so i did (0.05*10^-9)
thats how i got (2.5*10^-21)??..i don't know wat to do??
how is it wrong??..help!

r is the distance between the charges, in metres.

 

[suf7]

i don't understand where you got the 10^-18 from on the top line?...and where does the 2.5m^2 and 10^-3 come from?..i just tried to follow the formula..lol..but i dint do it very well..lol

 

[Nylex]

i don't understand where you got the 10^-18 from on the top line?

He converted the charges into coulombs, from nano-coulombs. 1 nC = 10^-9 C and since q1 x q2 = C^2, you get (10^-9)^2 = 10^-18.

 

[arildno]

i don't understand where you got the 10^-18 from on the top line?...and where does the 2.5m^2 and 10^-3 come from?..i just tried to follow the formula..lol..but i dint do it very well..lol

[tex]Q1=2.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q4=5.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q1*Q4=10.0*10^{-18}C^{2}[/tex]

Is that clear?

 

[suf7]

He converted the charges into coulombs, from nano-coulombs. 1 nC = 10^-9 C and since q1 x q2 = C^2, you get (10^-9)^2 = 10^-18.

y is this even on the top line for? i thought its just q1*q2 on the top line?

 

[suf7]

[tex]Q1=2.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q4=5.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q1*Q4=10.0*10^{-18}C^{2}[/tex]

Is that clear?

oh right..thanks..lol..i understand the top line,that makes complete sense now... just the bottom line doesnt??

 

[arildno]

y is this even on the top line for? i thought its just q1*q2 on the top line?

Yes, and
[tex]Q1=2.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q4=5.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
When substituting these values for Q1 and Q4, EVERYTHING on the right-hand sides of these equations must be included in the charges' places in the formula.
That's what I've done; you have not.

 

[arildno]

All right, you get the top line.
Can you now go back to post 20 and pinpoint what you don't understand?

 

[suf7]

Yes, and
[tex]Q1=2.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
[tex]Q4=5.0*10^{-9}C[/tex]
When substituting these values for Q1 and Q4, EVERYTHING on the right-hand sides of these equations must be included in the charges' places in the formula.
That's what I've done; you have not.

nice1, i got that bit now, i don't think i converted into C, i left it as nC..thanks for clearing that for me.

 

[suf7]

You should have (I include the sign (direction) for the force):
[tex]F=-\frac{10.0*10^{-18}C^{2}}{4\pi*\epsilon_{0}*2.5m^{2}*10^{-3}}[/tex]
If I understand your calculation correctly, you placed the [tex]10^{-18}[/tex] factor in your denominator, rather than in your numerator.

its the "2.5m^2" and the "10^-3", i don't know where they come from??

 

[arildno]

All right!
The DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 (that is, what I've called [tex]r_{41}[/tex])
is:
[tex]r_{41}= 0.05m=5*10^{-2}m[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]r_{41}^{2}=25*10^{-4}m^{2}=2.5*10^{-3}*m^{2}[/tex]
is that cleared up now?

 

[suf7]

All right!
The DISTANCE between Q1 and Q4 (that is, what I've called [tex]r_{41}[/tex])
is:
[tex]r_{41}= 0.05m=5*10^{-2}m[/tex]
Hence,
[tex]r_{41}^{2}=25*10^{-4}m^{2}=2.5*10^{-3}*m^{2}[/tex]
is that cleared up now?

ok, i think that makes sense...so is this right??
f = (10*10^-18) / (4pi)(Eo)(2.5*10^-3)
= 3.597*10^-5

 

[arildno]

That seems much better..
And in which direction does this force push Q4?
(That's VERY important to know!)

 

[suf7]

thanks..phew, uve actually taught me soemthing, thanks to you it makes a lot more sense..your explanations have been really good, sorry if i annoyed u with my lack of intelligence..lol..erm, not sure, how can u tell the direction of push??