- #1
SELFMADE
- 80
- 0
These are no more than drugs. They work as drugs in people' brains. So why should they be encouraged or even consumed in the first place? In my view, we need to ban them. Or we should legalize all drugs.
Could you provide some peer reviewed references?SELFMADE said:They work as drugs in people' brains.
bp_psy said:Could you provide some peer reviewed references?
TheStatutoryApe said:Yeah, I'm really not sure that art and other aesthetic mediums actually cause a drug like reaction in the brain. If the OP could produce a scientific article discussing this idea that may be helpful.
Good heavens are you talented.zoobyshoe said:
"CRAZY" by Mr. Z Shoe. Pencil on Bristol Board, 14 x17, 2008
SELFMADE said:These are no more than drugs. They work as drugs in people' brains. So why should they be encouraged or even consumed in the first place? In my view, we need to ban them. Or we should legalize all drugs.
S_Happens said:Fantastic piece Zooby! The irony makes it all the better.
GeorginaS said:Good heavens are you talented.
My thoughts on your thoughts: What makes you think anyone cares and what makes you think your opinions are worth publishing?SELFMADE said:These are no more than drugs. They work as drugs in people' brains. So why should they be encouraged or even consumed in the first place? In my view, we need to ban them. Or we should legalize all drugs.
FredGarvin said:My thoughts on your thoughts: What makes you think anyone cares and what makes you think your opinions are worth publishing?
Oddbio said:True we could ban all pleasurable things, and we probably would be more productive as a species and our scientific and technological advancements would skyrocket (I would think).
bp_psy said:Could you provide some peer reviewed references?
Kronos5253 said:Most of the greatest advancements mankind has made in just about every field has been made by "druggies" and "psychos" to use the terms liberally (which really makes me wonder sometimes lol).
Loren Booda said:The difference being that "psychos" treated not to hallucinate, etc. are proving themselves much more productive. Physical and mental self-destruction came and comes from self-medicating.
Kronos5253 said:Most of the greatest advancements mankind has made in just about every field has been made by "druggies" and "psychos" to use the terms liberally (which really makes me wonder sometimes lol).
zoobyshoe said:If by "liberally" you mean completely inaccurately, then yes.
Chi Meson said:It sounded to me like the rant of someone who was just busted.
Galteeth said:I don't know about the druggies part, but most of the revolutionary advances were probably considered "crazy" before they were successfully completed.
Kronos5253 said:To the latter part, of course of course, that's psychology 101. But that's also kind of a circular statement, because most self-medicating is a form of self-destruction anyway.
But I don't know that I understand what you mean by the first part... Can you elaborate more, or explain it in a different way?
If you'd ever personally known any heroin addicts, and I mean real addicts, the ones that shake, and stutter, and drool, and need two people to inject them because they're shaking too much, you'd understand why they don't accomplish anything.SELFMADE said:Let me put it this way, what if you made addicts out of a group of bright young people and told them to make discoveries, accomplish great things for mankind or else they can't get their doses of heroin?
Loren Booda said:It's ironic that for ages 13-24 I was self-medicating anxiety, depression and later psychosis with some alcohol, pot and more serious drugs. Once I accepted a medical regimen and quit the drugs, however, I ceased social withdrawal, acting out and hallucinations, and found an appropriate pharmacology to fight the very habits I had formerly indulged.
As you can see, I am a believer in the healing powers of medicine. The brain has great ability to explore safely mental phenomena without drug abuse. I used to take substances to risk what I must now ingest pills against - self-destruction.
zoobyshoe said:If by "liberally" you mean completely inaccurately, then yes.
Galteeth said:In terms of the arts, there is a fairly high correlation between creativity and mental abnormailty.
Galteeth said:I could be wrong, but I think the OP's point was more so that banning drugs on the basis that enducing pleasure through neurochemical alteration of the brain is somehow intrinsically immoral is an inconsistent position, illusrated by his hyperbolic example.
zoobyshoe said:This is a meme you run into a lot, but if you read the history it turns out very few great innovators were considered "crazy", much less "psycho" in their time. Most of the opposition they encountered could be boiled down to the mere belief they were absolutely wrong.
I was thinking this was probably the case. It does not detract from the fact (or so I believe it to be fact until otherwise enlightened) that his comparison is rather poor. In any event there is quite a difference between the introduction of foreign chemicals to the body and natural neurochemical reactions to stimuli. Note that I am not making any ethical judgments, only pointing out the difference.Galteeth said:I could be wrong, but I think the OP's point was more so that banning drugs on the basis that enducing pleasure through neurochemical alteration of the brain is somehow intrinsically immoral is an inconsistent position, illusrated by his hyperbolic example.
I think that you would be destroying brilliant young minds. Even accounting for the many great minds of history that were addicts and loons it was most often felt that they burned out or died before their time, that they could have done so much more.SELFMADE said:Let me put it this way, what if you made addicts out of a group of bright young people and told them to make discoveries, accomplish great things for mankind or else they can't get their doses of heroin?
Harmful? I don't see any, they are working for the benefit of all.
For every clinically insane or drug addled scientist how many perfectly sane and non-drug using scientists were there? And for every brilliant druggie or fruitcake in history how many intelligent people were simply destroyed by drugs and mental illness?Kronos5253 said:I'm pretty sure that correlation exists in mathematics and science as well...
Best example I can come up with on the spot is John Forbes Nash, Jr, which is who's life "A Beautiful Mind" is loosely based.