- #1
dcheme7373
- 2
- 1
The question, "why didn't the emerging universe collapse into a black hole" has been answered in other forums. Though I am not sure I understand the reason. But it got me thinking. Is it particularly stupid to ponder whether a black hole has a maximum possible mass? Or rather a certain mass threshold for which exceeding it results in some other phenomena? I believe the current accepted assumption is that more mass will just create a larger black hole and theoretically if all the mass in the universe was in close proximity to a black hole then we would have a black hole equal in mass to the mass of the universe. But the last time all the mass in the universe was at one point it spread out and did not form a black hole. Any thoughts?