- #36
AlephZero
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 6,982
- 298
Well, I think it's relevant to the constancy of human nature that a lot of economic pain was caused by the public at large being fleeced by financial "experts" (in the UK in 1720, and in the US in recent history). But I accept some people think history didn't start until 1776OmCheeto said:I've been involved in lots of these economics threads, and know lots about economic history. But I have no desire to become an expert in economic history, knowing every bubble that ever existed. On top of that, It's irrelevant to the thread topic.
Sorry, you lost me there. I guess that must be the date of something significant in US economics (though Google hasn't told me what it was) but I'm in the UK.So are you one of those "investors" that had to change his panties on July 6, 2007?
GE has been not been playing by Adam Smith's rules.
Note the words "endeavours" and "provided that". Sometimes the grass really is greener in the next field.Adam Smith said:First, every individual endeavours to employ his capital as near home as he can, and consequently as much as he can in the support of domestic industry; provided always that he can thereby obtain the ordinary, or not a great deal less than the ordinary profits of stock.