Is My Physics Curriculum Weak Compared to Other Schools?

In summary: However, it covers the four core areas that grad schools look for (classical, E&M, quantum, and thermo) and offers a healthy amount of physics electives and opportunities for research. It is also important to do well in these courses and to go above and beyond the minimum requirements, such as taking graduate courses or doing independent study, in order to stand out among other applicants.
  • #1
jbrussell93
413
38
After talking with students from other schools and looking around at "typical" physics curricula, I can't help but wonder whether mine is a bit weak... I go to a large state school with a relatively tiny physics department and part of me thinks they have condensed the workload in order to convince more students to major in physics or even double major in it (I'm one of the few students who isn't double majoring in math or engineering). What do you guys think? These are the requirements:

Physics:
Undergrad Seminar
Physics I
Physics II
Intro Modern Physics
Mechanics [Symon]
E&M I (there is technically an E&M II but I've never seen it offered) [Griffiths]
Thermodynamics [?]
Quantum I [Griffiths]
Advanced Physics Lab
Capstone (Quantum II, Senior Thesis, Issues in Modern Physics & Tech)
+ 4 Upper Level Physics electives

Math:
Calc I-III [Stewart]
ODE
+ 2 Upper Level Math electives

There is a healthy amount of physics electives offered and some decent research going on.
http://physics.missouri.edu/undergraduate-program/undergrad-courses/

Do you think this would be good enough preparation for top grad schools?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It looks good to me.
My undergraduate degree (from a large state university with a large physics department) had similar requirements.

Of course, getting into a good grad school depends on how well you do in these courses and how well you impress your faculty to get good letters of reference. (If you can fit them in and feel ready for them, you might wish to take some grad courses that are available to you... not necessarily to place out of them in grad school.. but to get a taste of them.)

[I used to visit the Math Department at UM-Columbia for Relativity talks (hosted by John Beem)
... but never got to the Physics Department unfortunately.
From the number of faculty in the Physics Department roster, I wouldn't call it "[relatively] tiny" (compared to all departments [in a university or a small-liberal arts college] with a physics major). I'd call tiny "fewer than 10".]
 
  • #3
Those requirements cover the four core areas that grad schools look for: classical, E&M, quantum and thermo (does it include any stat mech?).

What do you think is missing from the requirements, and is it offered as an elective? Minimal requirements for the major are a problem only if you actually limit yourself to that minimum.

Can you do independent study or directed study courses for material that isn't covered in the core or elective courses?
 
  • #4
robphy said:
It looks good to me.
My undergraduate degree (from a large state university with a large physics department) had similar requirements.

Of course, getting into a good grad school depends on how well you do in these courses and how well you impress your faculty to get good letters of reference. (If you can fit them in and feel ready for them, you might wish to take some grad courses that are available to you... not necessarily to place out of them in grad school.. but to get a taste of them.)

[I used to visit the Math Department at UM-Columbia for Relativity talks (hosted by John Beem)
... but never got to the Physics Department unfortunately.
From the number of faculty in the Physics Department roster, I wouldn't call it "[relatively] tiny" (compared to all departments [in a university or a small-liberal arts college] with a physics major). I'd call tiny "fewer than 10".]

Well that makes me feel much better. I've worked my tail off to keep a 4.0 going into my junior year and would hate to be shot down because my program isn't rigorous enough... I don't think I'll be able to fit any grad classes in though, as much as I'd like to. And yes, the physics faculty roster is definitely impressive for a not very well known state school. I guess I meant small by the number of physics majors compared to other programs here.

jtbell said:
Those requirements cover the four core areas that grad schools look for: classical, E&M, quantum and thermo (does it include any stat mech?).

What do you think is missing from the requirements, and is it offered as an elective? Minimal requirements for the major are a problem only if you actually limit yourself to that minimum.

Can you do independent study or directed study courses for material that isn't covered in the core or elective courses?

Yes "thermo" is essentially stat mech at my school. I guess it just seems that many schools have 2 semesters of modern physics, upper level mechanics, E&M, or quantum as apposed to only one of each. There is a second semester of quantum offered but not any of the other upper level classes. Many schools also seem to have 1 or 2 more lab classes (including electronics) and a 1 or 2 semester math methods sequence. We do have math methods [Boas] which I will take as an elective next semester and I've taken Optics w/lab [Hecht] as an elective. We also have an electronics lab elective..

I believe there are opportunities for independent study so I guess that is always an option. I'm interested in geophysics but we don't have any faculty in physics so I'll be doing research with a seismologist (with a physics PhD) in the geology department. So I guess that is kind of my "independent study".

I guess I just wanted to get a perspective on what other people's undergrad preparations have been compared to mine. It sounds like I'm just looking too deeply into this and worrying about nothing. Thanks for the replies guys.
 
  • #5
Requirements are the _minimum_ required, as jtbell has noted.

To stand out among others with similar "requirements", you should
(probably in order)
do well in the requirements,
and
do more than the required courses (and maybe make that known in your application essay and to your recommenders).

Unlike small-liberal arts colleges and primarily-undergraduate institutions,
you have a graduate program there... which means that you have access to
more electives and more possibilities for independent study (in a wider range of topics), faculty with active research groups (which could offer some research experiences, as well as network connections to other institutions), and grad students who can offer advice to you.

(It would be good to work in some computational methods into your studies.)

Yes, the Physics major is generally a tiny-size major (in terms of the number of students) in most colleges and universities. That's distressing because if they get too small, they might get eliminated [e.g. by not replacing retiring faculty] and demoted or absorbed into a "science department"... but that's life, I guess.
 
  • #6
I will definitely keep that in mind and try to squeeze in as many electives as possible.

robphy said:
(It would be good to work in some computational methods into your studies.)

Do you have any suggestions? There is a computational physics course which I am considering. Also I'm going to try to squeeze in a course in numerical analysis or numerical linear algebra (both using Matlab).
 
  • #7
A computational physics course would be good.
(If no such dedicated course existed, I would have suggested trying to doing something numerical in one of your upper level classes... just to get some experience.)
 
  • #8
Thanks, I'll just stick to my plan of taking that then. I probably won't worry about taking numerical analysis unless I just have an open spot somewhere in my schedule.
 

Related to Is My Physics Curriculum Weak Compared to Other Schools?

1. What is a weak physics curriculum?

A weak physics curriculum refers to a curriculum that lacks depth and rigor in teaching fundamental concepts and principles of physics. It often includes a limited range of topics and does not adequately prepare students for higher level physics courses or real-world applications.

2. How can a weak physics curriculum impact students?

A weak physics curriculum can negatively impact students in several ways. It can limit their understanding and mastery of physics concepts, leading to poor performance in exams and difficulty in applying principles in real-world situations. It can also discourage their interest in pursuing further studies or careers in physics.

3. What are some signs of a weak physics curriculum?

Some signs of a weak physics curriculum include a lack of hands-on experiments or practical applications, outdated or simplified content, and a heavy focus on memorization rather than problem-solving. Another sign is a low enrollment rate in physics courses or poor performance of students in standardized physics tests.

4. How can a weak physics curriculum be improved?

A weak physics curriculum can be improved by incorporating more relevant and engaging topics, such as current research and technological advancements. It can also benefit from including more hands-on experiments and applications to make the learning experience more interactive and practical. Additionally, providing professional development opportunities for teachers and updating teaching materials can also contribute to improving the curriculum.

5. What can students do if they are struggling with a weak physics curriculum?

If students are struggling with a weak physics curriculum, they can seek additional resources, such as online tutorials, textbooks, or study groups, to supplement their learning. They can also communicate their concerns with their teacher or school administrators and advocate for a more comprehensive physics curriculum. Additionally, they can consider taking advanced or independent study courses to further their knowledge and skills in physics.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
941
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
802
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
971
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
1K
Back
Top