- #1
ank_gl
- 741
- 0
ends justifies the means!
ends justifies the means!
really??
ends justifies the means!
really??
"Ends justifies the means" is a phrase that refers to the idea that the outcome or result of an action is more important than the methods or actions used to achieve it. It suggests that if the end result is positive, the actions taken to reach it can be overlooked or justified.
This is a highly debated question and there is no clear answer. Some argue that the end does not justify the means, as the means used to achieve a goal can have negative consequences. Others argue that in certain circumstances, such as in war or in a life or death situation, the end may justify the means.
This is a complex question and depends on the specific context. In general, the pursuit of scientific knowledge and advancements is seen as a positive end, and the means used to achieve it are heavily regulated and monitored to ensure ethical standards are met.
Yes, there are numerous examples in history where this phrase has been applied. One example is the development of the atomic bomb during World War II. The end goal of ending the war was seen as justifying the means of developing and using such a destructive weapon.
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that states the best action is the one that maximizes overall happiness or well-being. The concept of "Ends justifies the means" aligns with utilitarianism in that the ultimate goal or end result is what is considered most important, rather than the means used to achieve it.