- #1
rashida564
- 220
- 6
it is a common arrangement that say if evolution is true then why there is a monkey until this moment . I now that evolution is correct but who i can answer this question .
Monkeys and humans are not the same animal. Evolution is not a straight line, it is a branching tree. Monkeys are on one path and have STAYED on that path. Humans, a very long time ago, were on the same path, but branched off into their own path.rashida564 said:it is a common arrangement that say if evolution is true then why there is a monkey until this moment . I now that evolution is correct but who i can answer this question .
Why should they?rashida564 said:why not all the Monkeys get evolve to human
Why don't cats evolve to lions? It's simply the case that both models are successful in their corner of the world. And we still evolve! And I assume other species, too.rashida564 said:why not all the Monkeys get evolve to human
No monkeys evolved into humans. Please reread post #2.rashida564 said:why not all the Monkeys get evolve to human
Humans are still evolving, yes.can the human get evolve
By adaptation, selection and random changes.rashida564 said:how we evolve
No, you are mis-reading the chart. Ocean rust was a stage in the Earth, like an ice age.rashida564 said:we began with oceans rust
rashida564 said:how we evolve
[PLAIN said:http://www.pnas.org/content/104/52/20753][/PLAIN]
Abstract:
Genomic surveys in humans identify a large amount of recent positive selection. Using the 3.9-million HapMap SNP dataset, we found that selection has accelerated greatly during the last 40,000 years. We tested the null hypothesis that the observed age distribution of recent positively selected linkage blocks is consistent with a constant rate of adaptive substitution during human evolution. We show that a constant rate high enough to explain the number of recently selected variants would predict (i) site heterozygosity at least 10-fold lower than is observed in humans, (ii) a strong relationship of heterozygosity and local recombination rate, which is not observed in humans, (iii) an implausibly high number of adaptive substitutions between humans and chimpanzees, and (iv) nearly 100 times the observed number of high-frequency linkage disequilibrium blocks. Larger populations generate more new selected mutations, and we show the consistency of the observed data with the historical pattern of human population growth. We consider human demographic growth to be linked with past changes in human cultures and ecologies. Both processes have contributed to the extraordinarily rapid recent genetic evolution of our species.
rashida564 said:why not all the Monkeys get evolve to human
I don't think sorashida564 said:can the human get evolve
So, you think that modern humans just sprang into being like magic?bayi said:I don't think so
"Many were increasingly of the opinion that they'd all made a big mistake coming down from the trees in the first place, and some said that even the trees had been a bad move, and that no-one should ever have left the oceans." (D. Adams, 1st vol. of 5 from the trilogy)phinds said:So, you think that modern humans just sprang into being like magic?
Monkeys aren't humans. Humans have been able to evolve in a way monkeys have not been able to discover for millions of years.rashida564 said:why not all the Monkeys get evolve to human
It's not a matter of "discovery" --- that's not how evolution works.Thomas McGuigan said:Monkeys aren't humans. Humans have been able to evolve in a way monkeys have not been able to discover for millions of years.
Sorry… didn't realize I said that until you pointed it outphinds said:It's not a matter of "discovery" --- that's not how evolution works.
Exactly, Evolution is change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to biodiversity at every level of biological organisation, including the levels of species, individual organisms, and molecules.Promytius said:Evolution is not simply replacing one thing with another; and also one thing evolving from another, earlier thing, does not necessarily cause the extinction of that earlier thing, or anything else. A tree branch branches and that does not kill off the first branch, does it? If you study that wonderful chart referenced above, you will see few core branches have gone extinct; evolution seems to be very robust in its diversity here, and it is mostly an additive process, not a replacement process.
russ_watters said:Humans are still evolving, yes.