- #1
omegabeta
- 10
- 0
It seems to me that singularities are taken for granted as existing, otherwise there couldn't be a big bang.
Is that so?
To me, to believe in singularities is in no way different to believing in a God.
Is there any reason you can think of that precludes all other scenarios from explaining existence?
For example, could it be that creation, for want of a better word, is actually an on going process that has a source and from that source all things come and continue to come?
Or could the contents of our Universe when run backwards from now, not all reach the central point at the same time, but be separated by one Planck time each Planck energy?
For me the Planck energy density is absolute, no observer can detect any greater energy density, no matter what. The way I see the Universe, to exceed the PED would turn the Universe inside out and basically ruin it completely, or at the very least make a mockery out of it.
I apologise if this topic has been covered ad nauseam already.
But I'd love to know if this is all settled already>
Is that so?
To me, to believe in singularities is in no way different to believing in a God.
Is there any reason you can think of that precludes all other scenarios from explaining existence?
For example, could it be that creation, for want of a better word, is actually an on going process that has a source and from that source all things come and continue to come?
Or could the contents of our Universe when run backwards from now, not all reach the central point at the same time, but be separated by one Planck time each Planck energy?
For me the Planck energy density is absolute, no observer can detect any greater energy density, no matter what. The way I see the Universe, to exceed the PED would turn the Universe inside out and basically ruin it completely, or at the very least make a mockery out of it.
I apologise if this topic has been covered ad nauseam already.
But I'd love to know if this is all settled already>