- #1
getPhysical()
- 5
- 0
This question relates to Griffiths: Introduction to Elementary Particles, p. 196
The process in question is a neutral pion decay into two photons. It is stated that because the secondary particles are massless, the amplitude for this process is:
[tex]
M(p_2,p_3)
[/tex]
where [tex]p_2[/tex] and [tex]p_3[/tex] are the momentum three-vectors of the secondary photons. Conservation of momentum further implies that [tex]p_2=-p_3[/tex]. So far, so good.
However, Griffiths then states that
[tex]
|M|^2
[/tex]
is a function of |p_2| only, meaning that |M|^2 has no angular dependency. Why is this?
The process in question is a neutral pion decay into two photons. It is stated that because the secondary particles are massless, the amplitude for this process is:
[tex]
M(p_2,p_3)
[/tex]
where [tex]p_2[/tex] and [tex]p_3[/tex] are the momentum three-vectors of the secondary photons. Conservation of momentum further implies that [tex]p_2=-p_3[/tex]. So far, so good.
However, Griffiths then states that
[tex]
|M|^2
[/tex]
is a function of |p_2| only, meaning that |M|^2 has no angular dependency. Why is this?
Last edited: