Converting a DISPLACEMENT vector in Cartesian to Cylindrical Corrdinates

In summary, a displacement vector can be described in either Cartesian or cylindrical coordinates, provided you have continuity and a bijection between the two systems.
  • #1
jasonpatel
35
0
Hi all,

I was wondering how would one go about converting a displacement vector in cartesian coordinates to cylindrical. I am getting a bit confused on how to deal with the unit vectors; converting a point in space is a simple task, but when it's a vector it just confuses me.

I am specifically working on describing a displacement vector along the axis of symmetry (z-axis) of a arbitrary helix i.e. the displacement vector from the z-axis to any point on the helix:

Describing the Helix in Cartesian:

{x=Rcosθ, y=Rsinθ, z=(h/2∏)θ}; h is the pitch of the helix, or height of one revolution of coil

Describing the Helix in Cylindrical:

{r=R, ∅=θ, z=(h/2∏)θ}
In Cartesian I have the displacement vector as...

(x-x')i + (y-y')j + (z-z')k =...

...(x-Rcos[θ])i + (y-Rsin[θ])j + (z-((h/2∏)θ))k=...; apply condition of being on z axis {0,0,z}

...(0-Rcos[θ])i + (0-Rsin[θ])j + (z-((h/2∏)θ))k=

...(-Rcos[θ])i + (-Rsin[θ])j + (z-((h/2∏)θ))k

Now, converting to cylindrical (or so I think):

{(-Rcos[θ])[itex]^{2}[/itex]+(-Rsin[θ])[itex]^{2}[/itex]}[itex]\hat{r}[/itex]=(R)[itex]\hat{r}[/itex]...

ArcSin[y/r][itex]\hat{θ}[/itex]=ArcSin[(([itex]\frac{-Rsinθ}{R}[/itex])]=-θ[itex]\hat{θ}[/itex]

(z-((h/2∏)θ))[itex]\hat{z}[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hey jasonpatel.

A vector should be considered a point with the magnitude of the point and the direction of the point since vectors are invariant under any kind of translation and so if you translate the vector so that the tail is at the origin, you get the head which corresponds to the point.

So converting the point from one system to another will give you the vector provided you have continuity in the space and the metric, and also provided you have a bijection between all points from one co-ordinate system to another.
 
  • #3
Hey Chiro,

thanks for the reply, but I think I am over thinking this problem of mine. So, in my confused state its hard for me to really grasp what you have said. Is there anyway you can check my work to see if it is correct?
 
  • #4
For these kind of calculations, I like to back up the answer with a computer calculation through something like Maple.

One thing I did notice as possible error is that your ArcSin should be Arctan since Rsin(theta)/Rcos(theta) = tan(theta) = y/x so theta = Arctan(y/x) where you adjust it for the right quadrant.

If I wanted to check this thoroughly I would calculate the metric tensor or calculate all the partial derivatives and then derive the result this way and Maple can do this for you without the possibility of error if the code is right.

But regardless of that, I think that if the ArcSin is changed to ArcTan(y/x) = phi, R = SQRT(x^2 + y^2), and z involves a function of theta (which is an adjusted value of ArcTan(y/x)) then it should be right if you are going from <x,y,z> to <r,phi,z_bar> (but again double check yourself with the partial derivatives which can be calculated from Maple or by hand).
 
  • #5
Awesome, thanks for the help Chiro! I will do as you mentioned with the ArcTan but I believe the result will be the same.

Also, I am not exactly sure what you mean by "metric" so Ill have to do some research into that and see if I can clear it up. Hope you don't mind me coming back to ask you a few more questions :)
 

Related to Converting a DISPLACEMENT vector in Cartesian to Cylindrical Corrdinates

What is the formula for converting a displacement vector in Cartesian to Cylindrical coordinates?

The formula for converting a displacement vector in Cartesian to Cylindrical coordinates is:
r = √(x2 + y2)
θ = tan-1(y/x)
z = z

Can a displacement vector be converted from Cylindrical to Cartesian coordinates?

Yes, a displacement vector can be converted from Cylindrical to Cartesian coordinates using the following formula:
x = r cos(θ)
y = r sin(θ)
z = z

What are the advantages of using Cylindrical coordinates over Cartesian coordinates for displacement vectors?

Cylindrical coordinates can often simplify calculations and equations, especially for systems with cylindrical symmetry. They are also useful for describing motion in cylindrical objects like pipes or cylinders. Additionally, Cylindrical coordinates can be used to easily convert between Cartesian and polar coordinates.

Are there any limitations to using Cylindrical coordinates for displacement vectors?

One limitation of Cylindrical coordinates is that they may not be suitable for systems with complex or irregular shapes. In these cases, Cartesian coordinates may be more appropriate. Additionally, Cylindrical coordinates can be more difficult to visualize compared to Cartesian coordinates.

Can displacement vectors be represented in other coordinate systems besides Cartesian and Cylindrical?

Yes, displacement vectors can also be represented in other coordinate systems such as spherical coordinates, polar coordinates, or even custom coordinate systems. The choice of coordinate system depends on the specific problem and the most convenient way to describe the displacement vector in that context.

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
914
Replies
18
Views
18K
Replies
5
Views
922
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
656
Replies
11
Views
9K
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top