- #1,261
Evo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
- 24,017
- 3,337
No.Kevin McHugh said:Us oldsters remember well. I saw it on the news. Am I a good source?
No.Kevin McHugh said:Us oldsters remember well. I saw it on the news. Am I a good source?
On gay marriage Gov. Pence is not significantly different from Obama in '08, and Pence is similar to, say, Reagan on abortion. I understand you disagree with these positions, but do you actually find them frightening? That is, were they frightening when held Obama or Reagan?Evo said:I suggest read where he stands on the issues, he scares the heck out of me...
Given they were wrong about Goldwater, The Atlantic is 1-1.Astronuc said:... Since 1857, they've only endorsed two presidential candidates, Abraham Lincoln (1860) and Lyndon Johnson (1964).
Yes. And Pence goes even further. You may not find his homophobia and the defunding of Planned Parenthood and such things scary, I do. I disagree with probably everything on his "on the issues" page. It's not just "gay marriage", he backed allowing companies to discriminate against hiring gays, he is against laws against hate crimes.mheslep said:On gay marriage Gov. Pence is not significantly different from Obama in '08, and Pence is similar to, say, Reagan on abortion. I understand you disagree with these positions, but do you actually find them frightening? That is, were they frightening when held Obama or Reagan?
I disagree with Pence on some of those issues too. I don't know why disagreement must become fear that provokes name calling, when the same gay marriage issue with Obama some years ago provoked a benign "not a fan" response, but now with Pence on the same issue he's called scary and homophobic.Evo said:Yes. And Pence goes even further. You may not find his homophobia and the defunding of Planned Parenthood and such things scary, I do. I disagree with probably everything on his "on the issues" page.
I don't intend to go off topic, but I was not a fan of Obama when he first started campaining, Gokul kept badgering me to like him, if it hadn't been for Palin, I might have voted for McCain, I don't know. I voted against Gore. But let's stay on topic.
It's due to his other actions that I mentioned, as I said not just gay marriage. but much more important issues.mheslep said:but now with Pence on the same issue he's called scary and homophobic.
http://www.ontheissues.org/IN/Mike_Pence.htmEvo said:he backed allowing companies to discriminate against hiring gays, he is against laws against hate crimes.
A contemporary real estate developer like Trump is very different from one 2 centuries. Furthermore, Trump is no George Washington. Did Washington lose his own money, likely, or borrow heavily from others and lose money of others? Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?mheslep said:George Washington was a real estate developer, and lost a lot money in some of his projects.
http://www.candocanal.org/articles/washington.html
Also was known for fierce temper, could swear a blue streak when roused.
If Trump did not do anything illegal concerning his taxes then I don't understand why it should be an issue. Shouldn't the issue be the tax code itself?Astronuc said:Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?
The tax code is certainly an issue. Is there any belief or evidence to suggest either candidate will encourage Congress to improve the tax code?TurtleMeister said:If Trump did not do anything illegal concerning his taxes then I don't understand why it should be an issue. Shouldn't the issue be the tax code itself?
I would certainly expect someone running for POTUS to know some of the world leaders with whom he or she will have to deal.In an http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1477014691/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDE2LzEwLzA2L3VzL3BvbGl0aWNzL2dhcnktam9obnNvbi1jYW1wYWlnbi5odG1sAA--/RS=%5EADA627eJMZ63ORS6W0OJiAzviyRvcc- , the New York Times asked Johnson, a former governor of New Mexico, if he knew the name of North Korea’s leader.
“I do,” the third-party candidate replied.
“You want me to name” the person, he continued, before adding, “Really.” Johnson ultimately declined to provide a name.
. . .
In early September, Johnson was widely ridiculed after drawing a blank on “Morning Joe” when asked about Aleppo, the most populous city in Syria and the epicenter of the ongoing refugee crisis.
Astronuc said:Did Washington lose his own money, likely, or borrow heavily from others and lose money of others? Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?
mheslep said:Given they were wrong about Goldwater
Astronuc said:Gary Johnson struggles once more on naming a foreign leader. Hint: The last three are Kim.
Intentionally misleading word choice aside, I would certainly expect - even hope - a smart man like Washington would have taken advantage of all the deductions and legal shelters available to him in order to legally "fail to pay taxes". Wouldn't you? Don't you?Astronuc said:Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?
It's more of a rhetorical question; no misleading choice of words. I don't take advantage of all deductions and legal shelters. My income tax rate is about 15% (including deferred income) with another 1.4% to Medicare/Medicaid and 6.1% to SS. While I take some deductions (e.g., mortgage, standard, . . .), there are charitable donations and business expenses that I don't use as deductions.russ_watters said:Intentionally misleading word choice aside, I would certainly expect - even hope - a smart man like Washington would have taken advantage of all the deductions and legal shelters available to him in order to legally "fail to pay taxes". Wouldn't you? Don't you?
I'll be explicit: "Fail to pay..." is roughly the legal definition of tax evasion. With the qualifier that came after, the phrase is incorrect and the sentence as a whole is self-contradictory.Astronuc said:It's more of a rhetorical question; no misleading choice of words.
Fair enough; for me also it is a question of cost/benefit. I have in the past taken deductions for home office equipment, but it is a pain to itemize for a few dollars, so I don't always do it. But if the stakes were tens or hundreds of thousands, I would.I don't take advantage of all deductions and legal shelters. My income tax rate is about...
Journalists don't need to ask him such questions or perhaps can't because he short-circuits (credit to Hillary for inventing the term) the questions he is asked. Take his "I know more about ISIS than the generals" statement and apply it to this question and you'll have his likely answer.HossamCFD said:I can't help but wonder how would Trump fare under similar specific questioning. Something tells me that there might be plenty of 'Aleppo moments' there if journalists were looking for them.
Same here.russ_watters said:Fair enough; for me also it is a question of cost/benefit. I have in the past taken deductions for home office equipment, but it is a pain to itemize for a few dollars, so I don't always do it. But if the stakes were tens or hundreds of thousands, I would.
You'll recall that the scoflaws prior to the revolution went to great lengths to refuse to pay taxes on imports from Great Britain. Tea, etc. After establishment of the US, no US income tax was collected for the first 130 years or so. Also, aside from the civil war, the spending of the US government never exceeded 4% of US GDP from 1792 until WWI. Now federal spending approaches 25% of GDP. Total state, local, and federal almost 40%. The point being, that there was no leviathan government collecting enough tax to motivate many to avoid it. As you say, things were different back then, especially the size of government.Astronuc said:Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government
Not just Trump. That UN diplomat, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein of Jordan, decided to use his diplomatic passport to speak in Cleveland about the US election, and earlier also unloaded on political leaders in half a dozen other countries. Not among the targets: any of the middle eastern totalitarian governments. How does he find the time in between invited speeches from Hollywood movie stars at the UN (this year Leo DiCaprio, Emma Watson).SW VandeCarr said:The Russian government has sent a formal complaint to the UN for the criticism of Donald Trump by a UN human rights official.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/un-criticism-of-trump-prompts-russian-response-229287
...Zeid also criticized by name the pro-Brexit head of the U.K. Independence Party, Nigel Farage, who appeared with Trump at an August rally; Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico; Austrian presidential candidate Norbert Hofer; French nationalist leader Marine Le Pen; Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban; and Czech President Milos Zeman.
If Clinton was built in such a way as to have said something like that, instead of her all-is-well except for the "deplorable" Americans narative, she'd be 20 points ahead. But she is not built in such a way.Astronuc said:...
I can appreciate folks frustrations, but Trump is not the answer.
Clinton could have chosen her words more carefully. If she mentioned 'half', rather than those who are "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic", then she's writing off many people. Clinton could have simply acknowledged those who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change, and who may be the majority of Trump supporters.olivermsun said:The thing is, the context seems to describe a dichotomy:
I agree with you there.Astronuc said:Clinton could have chosen her words more carefully. If she mentioned 'half', rather than those who are "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic", then she's writing off many people. Clinton could have simply acknowledged those who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change, and who may be the majority of Trump supporters.
I'm saddened by disparaging comments by anyone who wants to represent the US and serve all it's citizens.
It might be a challenge, but through positive and constructive engagement. If one wishes to change the hearts and minds of someone, then one has to find a positive way, knowing that it may not work in all cases. One can address the issues without denigrating the other.olivermsun said:suppose it were actually true that half of Trump supporters embraced racism, sexism, etc., then would it mean that these things must be spoken about in a non-disparaging way? And if so, then how?
http://www.businessinsider.com/will-donald-trump-quit-republican-party-2016-10Calls for Donald Trump to remove himself from the presidential race rushed in late Friday and into Saturday morning from prominent Republican officials.
The last couple weeks for the real-estate businessman have gone from disappointing to near-apocalyptic.
Now, a bombshell audio recording that is shaping up to be the GOP nominee's biggest campaign scandal has forced some Republicans to hit the panic button.
GOP Sen. Mark Kirk of Illinois said on Friday Trump "should drop out" and the Republican National Committee "should engage rules for emergency replacement."
Sen. Mike Lee of Utah, whom Trump recently named as a potential Supreme Court nominee, echoed Kirk.
It's disappointing to say the least, but I'm old enough to remember JFK, Johnson, Nixon, Bill Clinton and others of which recordings reveal substance that would not be allowed on PF. I'll look for some links if needs be, others might find them quicker than I can.Astronuc said:http://www.businessinsider.com/will-donald-trump-quit-republican-party-2016-10
GOP leaders want Trump to step down. Isn't this unprecedented?
I remember comments of LBJ and Nixon, and we all know of Clinton's scandals, but they are all in the past. Trump is the current candidate and GOP nominee.RonL said:JFK, Johnson, Nixon, Bill Clinton and others
Yes, all that is true but happily we now live in a time when denigrating blacks, women, the disabled, etc, is more quickly and strongly condemned than it was even 20 years ago.RonL said:It's disappointing to say the least, but I'm old enough to remember JFK, Johnson, Nixon, Bill Clinton and others of which recordings reveal substance that would not be allowed on PF. I'll look for some links if needs be, others might find them quicker than I can.