A question on the product of two real linear operators

In summary, Paul Dirac explains in his book "The Principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th Ed" that the conjugate complex of the product of two linear operators is not necessarily the same as the product of the conjugate complexes of the factors in reverse order. This is because the product of two self-adjoint operators is not necessarily self-adjoint if they do not commute. The term "real" in this context refers to an operator that is self-adjoint, rather than its usual meaning. Therefore, the statement that "if ξ and η are real, in general ξη is not real" can be replaced with "if ξ and η are both self-adjoint, ξη is
  • #1
Excimer
8
0
I am reading The Principles of Quantum Mechanics 4th Ed by Paul Dirac, specifically where he introduces his own Bra-Ket notation. You can view this book as a google book.

http://books.google.com.au/books?id...ce=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

On page 28 (on linear operators acting on kets and bras), after showing that "the conjugate complex of the product of two linear operators equals the product of the conjugate complexes of the factors in reverse order",

He then says that "if ξ and η are real, in general ξη is not real".

Can someone please explain or post a link to a reference showing how it can be that the product of two real linear operators is not necessarily real?

OR, could it be a misprint?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
When he says "real", he means self-adjoint. So (ab) = ba = ba, which is not necessarily the same as ab. Thus the product of two self-adjoint operators is not self-adjoint if they don't commute.
 
  • #3
Thanks BIll,

You are referring to the previous page (27) where he says that when a linear operator is self adjoint it is called a 'real linear operator' (only because when the operator is a number and self adjoint then the conjuagte complex is real).

Is that correct?

So the term 'real' in this context now just means an operator that is self adjoint, rather than the normal meaning of the word real?

So one could replace his sentence using the word real to:

if ξ and η are both self adjoint, ξη is not necessarily also self adjoint.

Correct?
 

Related to A question on the product of two real linear operators

What is the definition of the product of two real linear operators?

The product of two real linear operators A and B is a new linear operator C such that for any two vectors x and y, C(x+y) = A(Bx+By).

How is the product of two real linear operators calculated?

To calculate the product of two real linear operators, you must first multiply the matrices representing the operators. The resulting matrix will represent the new linear operator.

What is the significance of the product of two real linear operators?

The product of two real linear operators is significant because it allows us to combine the effects of two linear transformations into one. This can be useful in various applications, such as in physics and engineering.

Can the product of two real linear operators be commutative?

In general, the product of two real linear operators is not commutative. This means that AB does not always equal BA. However, there are certain cases where the operators can commute, such as when one operator is a multiple of the other.

What are some real-world applications of the product of two real linear operators?

The product of two real linear operators has many real-world applications, including in signal processing, image processing, and control systems. It can also be used in quantum mechanics to describe the evolution of a quantum system.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top