A question on semisimple rings

  • Thread starter Ruslan_Sharipov
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Rings
In summary, we discussed the two concepts of ring semisimplicity, left and right, for non-unital rings. While they coincide for commutative rings, there may be different results for non-commutative rings that do not have a unit element. There may also be structure theorems for non-unital semisimple rings, although further research is needed to determine the specific results.
  • #1
Ruslan_Sharipov
104
1
I am interested in semisimple rings and semisimple modules which are not unital. There are two concepts of ring semisimplicity: left semisimplicity and right semisimplicity. A ring is called semisimple on the left if it is presented as a sum of its simple left ideals. A ring is called semisimple on the right if it is presented as a sum of its simple right ideals.

Do these two concepts coincide in the case of non-unital rings?

Are there any structure theorems for non-unital semisimple rings?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ruslan_Sharipov said:
I am interested in semisimple rings and semisimple modules which are not unital. There are two concepts of ring semisimplicity: left semisimplicity and right semisimplicity. A ring is called semisimple on the left if it is presented as a sum of its simple left ideals. A ring is called semisimple on the right if it is presented as a sum of its simple right ideals.

Do these two concepts coincide in the case of non-unital rings?
They coincide for commutative rings. ##1## has nothing to do with it here.
Are there any structure theorems for non-unital semisimple rings?
Very likely, but I don't know much about those rings. Also the standard results for semisimple rings might not - at least not all - use ##1\in R##.
 

Related to A question on semisimple rings

What is a semisimple ring?

A semisimple ring is a type of ring in abstract algebra that is characterized by having no nontrivial two-sided ideals. This means that every nonzero element in the ring has a multiplicative inverse, and the ring can be decomposed into a direct sum of simple rings.

What is the significance of semisimple rings in mathematics?

Semisimple rings are important in the study of representation theory and algebraic geometry. They also have applications in areas such as group theory and quantum mechanics.

How do semisimple rings differ from simple rings?

While both semisimple and simple rings have no nontrivial two-sided ideals, semisimple rings are further characterized by being a direct sum of simple rings. Simple rings, on the other hand, cannot be decomposed in this way.

Can semisimple rings have zero divisors?

No, semisimple rings cannot have zero divisors. This is because every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse, so there is no element that can multiply with another element to equal zero.

What is the relationship between semisimple rings and semisimple modules?

A semisimple ring is closely related to semisimple modules, as every semisimple module over a ring is also a semisimple ring. This means that the properties and structure of semisimple rings can also be applied to semisimple modules.

Similar threads

MHB Artinian Rings - Comments by P.M. Cohn, Ring Theory, page 66
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Understanding zero divisors & ##\mathbb{Z_m}## in Ring Theory
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
MHB What Are All the Possible Ideals in a Specific Ring of Matrices?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
874
MHB What are the ideals of the matrix ring?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
2K
A Structure of modulo-integer matrix group GL(r,Z(n))?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
17
Views
4K
I How Do You Prove a Matrix Ring is Right Artinian But Not Left Artinian?
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
8
Views
2K
Semisimple rings with a unique maximal ideals
    • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
872
I Second Isomorphism Theorem for Rings .... Bland Theorem 3.3.1
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Second Isomorphism Theorem for Rings .... Bland Theorem 3.3.15 .... ....
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
MHB Noetherian Rings and the Free R-module R^(n) .... Bland, Corollary 4.2.8 .... ....
    • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top