What is Spinor: Definition and 112 Discussions

In geometry and physics, spinors are elements of a complex vector space that can be associated with Euclidean space. Like geometric vectors and more general tensors, spinors transform linearly when the Euclidean space is subjected to a slight (infinitesimal) rotation. However, when a sequence of such small rotations is composed (integrated) to form an overall final rotation, the resulting spinor transformation depends on which sequence of small rotations was used. Unlike vectors and tensors, a spinor transforms to its negative when the space is continuously rotated through a complete turn from 0° to 360° (see picture). This property characterizes spinors: spinors can be viewed as the "square roots" of vectors (although this is inaccurate and may be misleading; they are better viewed as "square roots" of sections of vector bundles – in the case of the exterior algebra bundle of the cotangent bundle, they thus become "square roots" of differential forms).
It is also possible to associate a substantially similar notion of spinor to Minkowski space, in which case the Lorentz transformations of special relativity play the role of rotations. Spinors were introduced in geometry by Élie Cartan in 1913. In the 1920s physicists discovered that spinors are essential to describe the intrinsic angular momentum, or "spin", of the electron and other subatomic particles.Spinors are characterized by the specific way in which they behave under rotations. They change in different ways depending not just on the overall final rotation, but the details of how that rotation was achieved (by a continuous path in the rotation group). There are two topologically distinguishable classes (homotopy classes) of paths through rotations that result in the same overall rotation, as illustrated by the belt trick puzzle. These two inequivalent classes yield spinor transformations of opposite sign. The spin group is the group of all rotations keeping track of the class. It doubly covers the rotation group, since each rotation can be obtained in two inequivalent ways as the endpoint of a path. The space of spinors by definition is equipped with a (complex) linear representation of the spin group, meaning that elements of the spin group act as linear transformations on the space of spinors, in a way that genuinely depends on the homotopy class. In mathematical terms, spinors are described by a double-valued projective representation of the rotation group SO(3).
Although spinors can be defined purely as elements of a representation space of the spin group (or its Lie algebra of infinitesimal rotations), they are typically defined as elements of a vector space that carries a linear representation of the Clifford algebra. The Clifford algebra is an associative algebra that can be constructed from Euclidean space and its inner product in a basis-independent way. Both the spin group and its Lie algebra are embedded inside the Clifford algebra in a natural way, and in applications the Clifford algebra is often the easiest to work with. A Clifford space operates on a spinor space, and the elements of a spinor space are spinors. After choosing an orthonormal basis of Euclidean space, a representation of the Clifford algebra is generated by gamma matrices, matrices that satisfy a set of canonical anti-commutation relations. The spinors are the column vectors on which these matrices act. In three Euclidean dimensions, for instance, the Pauli spin matrices are a set of gamma matrices, and the two-component complex column vectors on which these matrices act are spinors. However, the particular matrix representation of the Clifford algebra, hence what precisely constitutes a "column vector" (or spinor), involves the choice of basis and gamma matrices in an essential way. As a representation of the spin group, this realization of spinors as (complex) column vectors will either be irreducible if the dimension is odd, or it will decompose into a pair of so-called "half-spin" or Weyl representations if the dimension is even.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  1. A

    Number of components of Dirac spinor in arbitrary dimensions.

    How does one calculate the number of components a Dirac spinor in arbitrary dimensions? As far as I understand, the textbooks treat the four spacetime dimensions and here the spinor has four components because the gamma matrices must be 4x4 in nature to satisfy the required algebra. Now suppose...
  2. S

    Help with Spinor: Wave Function Expression for Particles with Spin 1/2

    A beam of particles with spin 1/2 are coming out of a polarizer and moving along the x-axis, the spin of the particles points in the positive y direction. A uniform magnetic field is turned on and off over a short distance compared with the wavelength of the particle beam. The field is given by...
  3. N

    The generic spinor as a linear combination

    I have trouble understanding the concept of spin (spin 1/2 in this case). In Introduction to Quantum Mechanics Griffiths states that "the generic spinor X can be expressed as a linear combination of [eigenvectors of the spin component Sx] \chi = \frac{a+b}{\sqrt{2}}\chi^{(x)}_+ +...
  4. Q

    The exact meaning of the 4 components of the Dirac Spinor

    \PsiHow to intepret the four components of the dirac spinor? the volume integral of the \Psi^T*\Psi give the probability of finding the releativistic electron in a given volume of space but what exactly do the four components really mean. I have read in many Pop physics books that the 4...
  5. L

    Spin-1/2 systems, Spinor representation

    I'm totally confused on the relationship between kets written | \uparrow \rangle, | \downarrow \rangle and | \uparrow \uparrow \rangle, | \uparrow \downarrow \rangle | \downarrow \uparrow \rangle, | \downarrow \downarrow \rangle (Problem) I have a system of two spin-1/2 particles...
  6. I

    I was just wondering what a two component spinor was

    I was just wondering what a two component spinor was. Are they the pauli spin matrices? or are they use 2x1 vectors like the spin up and spin down vectors?
  7. C

    What is a Spinor? Is it the Coefficients of a State Ket?

    is a spinor essentially the coeffients of the base kets of an abitrary state ket?
  8. S

    Help About charge conjugation of Dirac spinor

    The following formula appears in P J Mulders's lecture notes http://www.nat.vu.nl/~mulders/QFT-0E.pdf {\cal C}~b(k,\lambda)~{\cal C}^{-1}~=~d(k,{\bar \lambda}) (8.18) where {\cal C} is charge conjugation operator. \lambda is helicity. I don't know why there is {\bar {\lambda}} on the...
  9. R

    Completing the Spinor Group Commutative Diagram

    Please, how to complete the commutative diagram shown on the following attachment picture? https://www.physicsforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=6121&d=1137568051"
  10. F

    Spinor fields and spinor wave functions

    Hi everyone, I've confused myself trying to understand Weyl spinors... here's my best attempt at well-posed questions: (by the way, a nice--if incomplete--reference on computations using Weyl spinors can be found http://www.courses.fas.harvard.edu/~phys253b/handouts/WeylFeynman.ps , from...
  11. F

    SU(N) Vector vs. Spinor Representations

    I'm a little bit confused about the difference between the spinor and vector representations of SU(N)--I guess I could start with asking how a spinor and a vector differ: is this only a matter of how they transform under Lorentz transformations? Following up, the covariant derivative for a...
  12. N

    Spinor Decomposition of a tensor

    Hi, I have heard, that a second rank tensor can always be decompose into a spin-2, a spin-1 and spin-0 part, being reducible. I want to pursue this further. Can anyone suggest me a nice reference for it? TIA Nikhil
Back
Top