What is Real numbers: Definition and 212 Discussions

In mathematics, a real number is a value of a continuous quantity that can represent a distance along a line (or alternatively, a quantity that can be represented as an infinite decimal expansion). The adjective real in this context was introduced in the 17th century by René Descartes, who distinguished between real and imaginary roots of polynomials. The real numbers include all the rational numbers, such as the integer −5 and the fraction 4/3, and all the irrational numbers, such as √2 (1.41421356..., the square root of 2, an irrational algebraic number). Included within the irrationals are the real transcendental numbers, such as π (3.14159265...). In addition to measuring distance, real numbers can be used to measure quantities such as time, mass, energy, velocity, and many more. The set of real numbers is denoted using the symbol R or




R



{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }
and is sometimes called "the reals".Real numbers can be thought of as points on an infinitely long line called the number line or real line, where the points corresponding to integers are equally spaced. Any real number can be determined by a possibly infinite decimal representation, such as that of 8.632, where each consecutive digit is measured in units one-tenth the size of the previous one. The real line can be thought of as a part of the complex plane, and the real numbers can be thought of as a part of the complex numbers.

These descriptions of the real numbers are not sufficiently rigorous by the modern standards of pure mathematics. The discovery of a suitably rigorous definition of the real numbers—indeed, the realization that a better definition was needed—was one of the most important developments of 19th-century mathematics. The current standard axiomatic definition is that real numbers form the unique Dedekind-complete ordered field (




R



{\displaystyle \mathbb {R} }
; + ; · ; <), up to an isomorphism, whereas popular constructive definitions of real numbers include declaring them as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences (of rational numbers), Dedekind cuts, or infinite decimal representations, together with precise interpretations for the arithmetic operations and the order relation. All these definitions satisfy the axiomatic definition and are thus equivalent.
The set of all real numbers is uncountable, in the sense that while both the set of all natural numbers and the set of all real numbers are infinite sets, there can be no one-to-one function from the real numbers to the natural numbers. In fact, the cardinality of the set of all real numbers, denoted by





c




{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {c}}}
and called the cardinality of the continuum, is strictly greater than the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers (denoted






0




{\displaystyle \aleph _{0}}
, 'aleph-naught').
The statement that there is no subset of the reals with cardinality strictly greater than






0




{\displaystyle \aleph _{0}}
and strictly smaller than





c




{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {c}}}
is known as the continuum hypothesis (CH). It is neither provable nor refutable using the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory including the axiom of choice (ZFC)—the standard foundation of modern mathematics. In fact, some models of ZFC satisfy CH, while others violate it.

View More On Wikipedia.org
  1. J

    Help with Countability Questions for Real Numbers

    Hi people, I need some help with these questions please: 1.Is the set of all x in the real numbers such that (x+pi) is rational, countable? I don't think this is countable, isn't the only possible value for x = -pi, all other irrationals will not make x+pi rational i thought? 2.Is...
  2. T

    Finding an Inner Product for Approximating Polynomials on a Set of Real Numbers

    Let S be a finite set of real numbers. What is a natural inner product to define on the space of all functions f:S->R? I want to approximate an arbitrary function with a polynomial of a fixed degree (both of which are defined only on S), and I want to use projections to do it, but I have no...
  3. happyg1

    Proving t is a Metric for Real Numbers Pairs

    Hello, I'm working on this problem: If t(P,Q)=max(|x1 - x2|,|y1 - y2|), show that t is a metric for the set of all ordered pairs of real numbers. I have proved the first three parts of the definition of a metric 1) t(P,Q) >0 2) t(P,Q) =0 IFF P=Q 3) t(P,Q) = t(Q,P) all not so hard. I'm...
  4. benorin

    Exploring the Cardinality of Cantor Set and Real Numbers

    So the problem, and my partial solution are in the attached PDF. I would like feedback on my proof of the first statement, if it is technically correct and if it is good. Any ideas as to how I can use/generalize/extend the present proof to proof the second statement, namely that E (the Cantor...
  5. M

    Is there a compact subspace of real numbers?

    This is something that I think I should already know, but I am confused. It really seems to me that the set of all real numbers, \Re should be compact. However, this would require that \Re be closed and bounded, or equivalently, that every sequence of points in \Re have a limit...
  6. A

    Proving the Existence of Rational Numbers Between Real Numbers

    prove that between any two real numbers there is a number of the form \frac{k}{2^n} where k is an integer and n is a natural number.
  7. I

    Properties of Roots of Real Numbers

    I have three problems that I can't seem to solve. I was wondering if anybody could help me or explain to me how to solve these. Note: * = multiplication. 1. (6^1/2 * 2^1/3)^6 2. ^4√7 + 2^4√1792 3. 3(X-4)^1/2 + 5 = 11
  8. R

    Why does commutivity of real numbers exist for multiplication

    Why does commutivity of real numbers exist for multiplication ie why a*b=b*a ? Roger
  9. K

    Exploring Real Numbers & Heine-Borel Theorem

    1.Does a sequence exist that has every point of R(real numbers) as an accumulation point? 2.Show that closed is essential in the Heine-Borel Theorem by finding an open cover of a non-closed bounded set that does not have a finite sub-cover. I think that the set of rational numbers has...
  10. T

    The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for real numbers

    Ok...here is some back ground into my new found situation. I have done very well in every math class up to this point in time so I felt it was time for me to start looking at taking some more difficult classes. That being said I am technically still in my freshman year in college so I may have...
  11. X

    Real numbers x and y, f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+1. If f(1)=2, what is f(3)?

    Ok, I'm sure this is an easy problem and all, but it's pissing me off. I'm probably just not understanding it. The function f has the property that for any real numbers x and y, f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)+1. If f(1)=2, what is f(3)? help.
  12. suyver

    Discovering an Unexpected Relationship Between 13 Real Numbers

    I just learned something really cool. Choose 13 real numbers x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_{13}\in\mathbbb{R} with x_i\neq x_j if i\neq j. For these 13 numbers there exist at least two numbers amongst them such that 0 \; < \; \frac{x_i-x_j}{1+x_ix_j} \; \leq \; 2-\sqrt{3} Isn't that cool?! (I...
Back
Top