Recent content by Abide

  1. A

    Ti 89, Solving multiple equations with complex numbers

    I know that haha, as it turns out, in my calculator for some reason you cannot use a and b as algebraic variables, it works perfectly fine using any other variable XD
  2. A

    Ti 89, Solving multiple equations with complex numbers

    Can anyone helpme with this? I am not having any luck at all, is this even possible?
  3. A

    Ti 89, Solving multiple equations with complex numbers

    Homework Statement So, I know how to solve multiple equations using the cSolve method on the ti 89, but for some reason when I try to solve the following... 80a + 240b = 0 and (80+J79.975)a-80b = 50 by using the following syntax... cSolve(80a + 240b = 0 and (80+J79.975)a-80b = 50...
  4. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    Ok, so I understand this a lot better now after reading the following link...feeling pretty stupid at the moment... http://www.mathsisfun.com/polar-cartesian-coordinates.html I now understand that the measurement is in Degrees after taking Tangeant inverse of y/x. My question now is, how do...
  5. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    I don't really know what you mean by explaining the graph...It looks like an elipse, and I believe that polar coordinate measure real and imaginary parts of a number - That may be completely wrong. I am also fully aware that 5/0 is undefined I was just using the definitions presented in my book...
  6. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    Well, for (5,0) the Polar Coordinates (r,theta) would be r = \sqrt{(5^2)+0^2} = 5 then the theta value would be Tan^{-1}(0) or (-5,0) the Polar Coordinates (r,theta) would be r = \sqrt{(-5^2)+0^2} = 5 then the theta value would be Tan^{-1}(0) for (0,5) the Polar Coordinates (r,theta) would be...
  7. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    It's an arc in the first quadrant, with a y maximum of 5 and an x maximum of 5. I don't really know what you're asking, I apologize. This is holding me up on every problem I try, I have no clue how you get these values for theta...
  8. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    This is what I got when I plotted it using wolfram, I assumed giving the max on the Y axis that it would be 5theta, I apologize if this is something simple, I am having a really difficult time understanding it http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=y+%3D+%2825-%28x%5E2%29%29%5E%281%2F2%29
  9. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    Ok, so it would be 0 to 5\Theta?
  10. A

    Cartesian Integral to Polar Integral

    Homework Statement Change the Cartesian integral to an equivalent polar integral and evaluate ∫∫dydx The bounds of the first integral (The outermost) are -5 to 5, and the bounds of the second (inner) are 0 to \sqrt{ 25-x^{2}}Homework Equations ∫∫dydx == ∫∫r(dr)(d\Theta) x^{2}+y^{2}=r^{2}...
  11. A

    Fourier Transform - Solving for Impulse Response

    Ok, but my question was more about whether I am performing the transform correctly , thank you for your response
  12. A

    Fourier Transform - Solving for Impulse Response

    Homework Statement I'm trying to Solve for an impulse response h(t) Given the excitation signal x(t) and the output signal y(t) x(t) = 4rect(t/2) y(t) = 10[(1-e-(t+1))u(t+1) - (1-e-(t-1))u(t-1)] h(t) = ? y(t) = h(t)*x(t) --> '*' meaning convolution! I am unsure how to take the Fourier...
  13. A

    Impulse Response of a discrete system

    Homework Statement Find the Impulse response of this system 3y[n]+4y[n-1]+y[n-2] = x[n] + x[n-1] Homework Equations Eigenvalues = -1/3 and -1 hc[n] = k1[-1/3]n+k2[-1]n 3h[n] +4h[n-1] +h[n-2] = δ[n] + δ[n+1] The Attempt at a Solution I know that normally we would plug in hc[n] for two...
  14. A

    Differential Equation- Height of water in tank

    Right but that isn't in the terms requested right? We can't have it in terms of output flow..or does y(t) somehow relate to valve resistance?
  15. A

    Differential Equation- Height of water in tank

    So then after some algebraic manipulation I have dh/dt= x(t)/A - h/RA This still uses output flow as a parameter, which isn't what the question wants. I'm sorry that I'm so hung up on this problem
Back
Top