Zero derivative on a strictly increasing function (not piecewise)

In summary, Homework Equations states a function f(x) is strictly increasing and has a derivative of zero at two points, but this function does not exist continously. There is no derivative of zero at infinitely many places, and the function family cannot be made strictly increasing by any manipulations. Integrating a function that is positive everywhere and zero at two points may produce a function g(x) that is differentiable and has a derivative of zero at x = ±1.
  • #1
quincyboy7
32
0

Homework Statement


Find a function, strictly increasing, whose derivative equals zero at TWO places. Find another such function whose derivative equals zero at infinitely many places. These should not be piecewise and should be continuous on all reals.

Homework Equations


f(x)=x^3 has one such spot, at x=0.


The Attempt at a Solution



I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.

Sine and cose functions probably can't be made strictly increasing by any manipulations. Inverse functions don't have derivatives equaling zero, I don't think.

E^x and sqrt(x) are both not continuous on both reals and don't have derivative zero anywhere.

I just can't think of anything more in terms of function "families" that could work...any pointers would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hi quincyboy7! :wink:
quincyboy7 said:
… I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.

that's right
Sine and cose functions probably can't be made strictly increasing by any manipulations.

how about stretching one of them out by adding another function to it? :smile:
 
  • #3
tiny-tim said:
how about stretching one of them out by adding another function to it? :smile:

Well, the function would still decrease even if it wasn't periodic, like cosx+x, right? There's no way sinx + FUNCTION doesn't go down at some interval, right? Even if that interval isn't regular...

EDIT: OH! The derivative of cosx+x is -sinx+1, which is 0 at infinitely many places and never negative! Thanks SO much.

But how would I get one that's "controllable" i.e. f'(x)=0 at only TWO places?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
min [d/dx (sinx + f(x))] = … ? :wink:
 
  • #5
Think about what the graph of the derivative of the function would look like.

BTW you can find an increasing polynomial with zero derivative at any finite number of points; it must be odd, and to have n such points must be of degree 2n+1 or higher. (You see why?). So for your first question, you need a quintic at least.
 
  • #6
henry_m said:
Think about what the graph of the derivative of the function would look like.

BTW you can find an increasing polynomial with zero derivative at any finite number of points; it must be odd, and to have n such points must be of degree 2n+1 or higher. (You see why?). So for your first question, you need a quintic at least.

I understand why it must be odd, but I don't quite get how you got the 2n+1 expression, even though it seems intuitive.

Alright, let me try to integrate a function that's positive everywhere and zero at 2 places...like x^2(x-1)^2, which will be INT (x^4-2x^3+x^2) or x^5/5 -x^4/2 + x^3/3...does that work?

EDIT: Here's how I think you got the 2n+1...the derivative equals zero at n places, but never crosses the x-axis so the form of the derivative is (x-n1)^2 (at least, could be 4, 6, 8, etc.) (x-n2)^2 etc. The order of the derivative will thus be at least 2n and the integral will be 2n+1 at least.
 
  • #7
quincyboy7 said:
I understand why it must be odd, but I don't quite get how you got the 2n+1 expression, even though it seems intuitive.

Alright, let me try to integrate a function that's positive everywhere and zero at 2 places...like x^2(x-1)^2, which will be INT (x^4-2x^3+x^2) or x^5/5 -x^4/2 + x^3/3...does that work?

EDIT: Here's how I think you got the 2n+1...the derivative equals zero at n places, but never crosses the x-axis so the form of the derivative is (x-n1)^2 (at least, could be 4, 6, 8, etc.) (x-n2)^2 etc. The order of the derivative will thus be at least 2n and the integral will be 2n+1 at least.

Exactly!

In fact, by thinking about the derivatives like this, you can get even nastier things. For example, you can have a function which is strictly increasing, differentiable everywhere and has infinitely many stationary points in a finite interval:
[tex]f(x)=\int_0^x \sin(1/t) dt +x[/tex]
[The tricky thing here is showing it's differentiable at the origin.]
 
  • #8
quincyboy7 said:
...
I can't imagine the answer is a polynomial, since the derivatives of those will have x terms that can equal 0 at only one place (think x^3, x^5, x^7, etc.). Any manipulations of such polynomials make them not strictly increasing, which is another problem.
...
If f(x) = x3, then f'(x) = 3x2.

Look at g'(x) = (x-1)2(x+1)2, which is zero at x = ±1, and positive otherwise.

Find g(x) by integration. Of course, g'(x) may be written as g'(x) = (x2-1)2 = x4 -2x2 +1 .
 

Related to Zero derivative on a strictly increasing function (not piecewise)

1. What does it mean for a function to have a zero derivative on a strictly increasing interval?

When a function has a zero derivative on a strictly increasing interval, it means that the slope of the function at every point on that interval is equal to zero. This indicates that the function is not changing or increasing in any direction on that interval.

2. Can a strictly increasing function have a zero derivative at a single point?

Yes, a strictly increasing function can have a zero derivative at a single point. This occurs when the function has a local maximum or minimum at that point, and the slope of the function is zero at that specific point.

3. Can a strictly increasing function have a zero derivative on a non-continuous interval?

No, a strictly increasing function cannot have a zero derivative on a non-continuous interval. This is because the function must be continuous for the derivative to exist, and a non-continuous interval would result in a discontinuity in the derivative as well.

4. How is the concept of a zero derivative on a strictly increasing function related to the first derivative test?

The first derivative test is used to determine the local extrema of a function by analyzing the sign of the derivative at different points. If a function has a zero derivative on a strictly increasing interval, it means that the function has a local minimum at the beginning of the interval and a local maximum at the end of the interval.

5. Can a strictly increasing function have a zero derivative on an infinite interval?

Yes, a strictly increasing function can have a zero derivative on an infinite interval. This can occur when the function approaches a horizontal asymptote, where the slope of the function becomes closer and closer to zero as the input increases towards infinity.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
440
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
384
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
980
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
553
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
974
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
341
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
397
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
884
Back
Top