Would a Retaliatory Strike Trigger Article 5?

  • News
  • Thread starter lisab
  • Start date
  • Tags
    article
In summary: So even if the initiator of the first strike believes they are retaliating, there is always the chance that someone else sees it as an attack.In summary, the treaty says that if an armed attack occurs against any NATO member, the other members are obligated to take military action to restore and maintain the security of the area. It is up to the individual NATO member state to decide whether or not they deem it necessary to take military action.
  • #1
lisab
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,026
623
Suppose a NATO country makes a first-strike against a non-NATO country. If that non-NATO country strikes back in an armed attack, is that considered an attack against all NATO countries?

In other words, would an armed attack on a NATO country that is a retaliatory strike trigger Article 5?

Article 5:
The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security .

http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_17120.htm

Consider the phrase " if such an armed attack occurs, each of them...will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith...such action as it deems necessary...". The use of "will assist" instead of "shall assist", and the phrase "...as it deems necessary" -- do these phrases give an out to NATO to not attack?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There's always an out. "Yes, the treaty says we will. But we won't. Suck it up." So I think the answer is "it depends on what the member states think".
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda and Bystander
  • #3
Yep, I read " each of them will assist the Party attacked by taking such action as it deems necessary to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area."

If one doesn't deem it necessary to lift a finger, I don't see why they would be obliged.
 
  • #4
It also may be worth pointing out the historically first strikes have been portrayed as retaliatory by their initiators. The 1939 German invasion of Poland was in "retaliation" for the Gleiwitz Incident.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2

1. What is Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty?

Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty is a mutual defense clause that states that an attack on one member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is considered an attack on all members. It was created to ensure collective defense and solidarity among member countries.

2. How would a retaliatory strike trigger Article 5?

A retaliatory strike would trigger Article 5 if it is in response to an attack on a NATO member. For example, if one member country is attacked by a non-NATO state, and another member country responds with a retaliatory strike, this would activate Article 5 and require all member countries to provide assistance to the attacked country.

3. Are there any limitations to Article 5?

Yes, there are limitations to Article 5. The attack must be on a NATO member and must be considered an armed attack. Also, the response must be necessary and proportional to the initial attack. The decision to activate Article 5 is made by the North Atlantic Council, the principal political decision-making body of NATO.

4. Has Article 5 been invoked before?

Yes, Article 5 has been invoked once in the history of NATO. After the 9/11 attacks on the United States, NATO declared that the attacks were considered an attack on all member countries. This led to the activation of Article 5 and the deployment of NATO forces to Afghanistan in support of the United States.

5. What could be the consequences of invoking Article 5?

The consequences of invoking Article 5 could vary depending on the situation. It could lead to a joint military response from all member countries, including the deployment of troops and military equipment. It could also result in increased political and economic cooperation among member countries to address the security threat. However, ultimately, the goal is to maintain peace and security among member countries and uphold the principles of the North Atlantic Treaty.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
3K
Back
Top