Why doesn't orbital angular momentum operator L commute with scalar operator S?

In summary, the angular momentum operators J and L commute, but the orbital angular momentum operator L does not.
  • #1
fayled
177
0
So the total angular momentum operator J commutes with any scalar operator S. The argument for this is that J is the generator of 'turntable rotations' (by this I mean we rotate the whole object about an axis, along with its orientation) and the expectation value of any scalar operator has to be invariant under such a rotation. This tells us that S commutes with the rotation operator and thus its generator J.

My question is why doesn't a similar argument hold for the orbital angular momentum operator L? The difference is that L generates rotations that rotate only the object but not its orientation around an axis. However surely the expectation value of a scalar operator should still be invariant under this type of rotation, meaning L and S commute. However this is not the case, because I know that any component of L does not commute with J2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Scalar operators that involve the orientation of the object may not be invariant under the rotations generated by ##\vec L##. For example consider the angle between an electron's spin axis and its momentum. This angle is a scalar quantity (related to the scalar operator ##\vec S \cdot \vec P##) which is invariant under the full rotations generated by ##\vec J##. But it is not invariant under the rotations generated by ##\vec L##, which will rotate the momentum but not the spin. You can confirm that ##[\vec J, \vec S \cdot \vec P] = 0## while ##[\vec L, \vec S \cdot \vec P] \neq 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory
  • #3
The_Duck said:
Scalar operators that involve the orientation of the object may not be invariant under the rotations generated by ##\vec L##. For example consider the angle between an electron's spin axis and its momentum. This angle is a scalar quantity (related to the scalar operator ##\vec S \cdot \vec P##) which is invariant under the full rotations generated by ##\vec J##. But it is not invariant under the rotations generated by ##\vec L##, which will rotate the momentum but not the spin. You can confirm that ##[\vec J, \vec S \cdot \vec P] = 0## while ##[\vec L, \vec S \cdot \vec P] \neq 0##.

Beautiful, thanks!
 

Related to Why doesn't orbital angular momentum operator L commute with scalar operator S?

1. What are commutation rules for L and J?

The commutation rules for L and J are mathematical equations that describe how the angular momentum operators L and J interact with each other. These rules are used to calculate the total angular momentum of a system, which is an important quantity in quantum mechanics.

2. What is the significance of commutation rules for L and J?

The commutation rules for L and J are significant because they allow us to understand how angular momentum behaves in quantum systems. They also help us to make predictions about the behavior of particles and atoms.

3. How do commutation rules for L and J differ from other commutation rules?

Commutation rules for L and J are specific to angular momentum operators, while other commutation rules may involve different operators such as position or momentum. Additionally, the commutation rules for L and J involve the cross product of two operators, rather than just the product or sum of two operators.

4. Can commutation rules for L and J be applied to any system?

Yes, commutation rules for L and J can be applied to any system that involves angular momentum, such as atoms, molecules, or subatomic particles. However, the specific values and equations used may differ depending on the system being studied.

5. How are commutation rules for L and J derived?

Commutation rules for L and J are derived from the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics, specifically the commutator relationship between operators. This involves applying mathematical techniques such as matrix algebra and calculus to the operators L and J to determine their commutation relationship.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
787
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top