Why does the integral of √(a² +x²) need Integration by parts?

Of course, that requires integrating by parts. There are other substitutions that can be used. For example, letting x= a tanh(t) and using the identity cosh^2(t)- sinh^2(t)= 1, we get a^2+ x^2= a^2(1+ tanh^2(t))= a^2 sech^2(t) and dx= a sech^2(t)dt so that the integral becomes a^2\int sech^3(t)dt= a^2\int \frac{dt}{cosh^3(t)} which, again, can be done by partial fractions. In summary, the given integral does not require integration by
  • #1
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
346
23
Why this integral $\int\left\{\sqrt{{a}^{2}+{x}^{2}}\right\}dx$ needs integration by parts?

Thanks

Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have edited the thread title to remove the $\LaTeX$ code that was embedded. We have measures in place to ensure that such code will not render within thread titles. It impedes searches and we ask that text be used in thread titles. :)

The given integral does not require integration by parts, as a trig. or hyperbolic trig. substitution can be used. :D
 
  • #3
Cbarker1 said:
Why this integral $\int\left\{\sqrt{{a}^{2}+{x}^{2}}\right\}dx$ needs integration by parts?

Thanks

Cbarker1

As MarkFL said, this does NOT need "integration by parts". Where did you get the idea that it did? We know that, for any angle, t, \(\displaystyle sin^2(t)+ cos^2(t)= 1\) so, dividing both sides by \(\displaystyle cos^2(t)\), \(\displaystyle tan^2(t)+ 1= sec^2(t)\). So we can write \(\displaystyle a^2+ x^2= a^2(1+ \left(\frac{x}{a}\right)^2)\) and, with the substitution \(\displaystyle \frac{x}{a}= tan(t)\), that becomes \(\displaystyle a^2(1= tan^2(t))= a^2 sec^2(t)\). Of course, if \(\displaystyle \frac{x}{a}= tan(t)\), then \(\displaystyle x= a tan(t)\) and \(\displaystyle dx= a sec^2(t)dt\) so \(\displaystyle \int\sqrt{a^2+ x^2}dx\) becomes \(\displaystyle \int \sqrt{a^2sec^2(t)}(a sec^2(t)dt)= a^2\int sec^3(t)dt= a^2\int \frac{dt}{cos^3(t)}\).

Since that is an odd power of cosine, we can integrate by multiplying both numerator and denominator by cos(t): \(\displaystyle a^2\int \frac{cos(t)dt}{cos^4(t)}= a^2\int \frac{cos(t)dt}{(1- sin^2(t))^2}\) and the substitution u= sin(t) gives the rational integral \(\displaystyle \int \frac{du}{(1- u^2)^2}\) which can be done by "partial fractions".
 

Related to Why does the integral of √(a² +x²) need Integration by parts?

1. Why is integration by parts necessary for the integral of √(a² +x²)?

The integral of √(a² +x²) cannot be solved by standard techniques of integration such as substitution or u-substitution. Therefore, integration by parts is needed to find the solution.

2. What is the reasoning behind using integration by parts for √(a² +x²)?

The integrand, √(a² +x²), contains a product of two functions: √(a² +x²) and 1. Integration by parts is a technique used to solve integrals with product of two functions.

3. Can the integral of √(a² +x²) be solved without using integration by parts?

No, integration by parts is the most efficient and accurate method for solving this type of integral. Other techniques, such as trigonometric substitution, may be used but they are more complicated and may not provide an exact solution.

4. Is there a specific rule or formula for using integration by parts for √(a² +x²)?

Yes, the integration by parts formula is ∫(u dv) = uv - ∫(v du), where u and v are functions of x and dv and du are their respective derivatives. This formula can be applied to solve the integral of √(a² +x²).

5. Are there any tips or tricks for solving the integral of √(a² +x²) using integration by parts?

One helpful tip is to choose u and dv in such a way that the integral becomes simpler or easier to solve. For example, choosing u = √(a² +x²) and dv = 1, will result in a simpler integral that can be easily solved. It is also important to pay attention to any patterns or simplifications that may arise during the integration process.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
301
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
378
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top