Why do large elliptical galaxies not collapse due to their gravity?

In summary: The conventional wisdom of the 1970's was that ellipticals were formed by two spiral galaxies colliding. That has been challenged by new simulations that indicate that the more likely outcome is a disk galaxy. This is supported by observations of galaxies that appear to have formed as the result of two disk galaxies merging. In summary, the shape of a galaxy is primarily determined by its supermassive black hole and the amount of gas present, with mergers and collisions playing a role but not necessarily resulting in an elliptical shape.
  • #1
Tanelorn
888
15
I have wondered this for a while now, what stops large elliptical galaxies from collapsing due to their gravity?
Their rotational speed is relatively small, at the rotational axis perhaps zero, so what is preventing the stars from being pulled towards the center? Do spherical ellipticals flatten with time?

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/a...nt-elliptical-galaxies-move-slowly-surely.htm
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Tanelorn said:
I have wondered this for a while now, what stops large elliptical galaxies from collapsing due to their gravity?
Their rotational speed is relatively small, at the rotational axis perhaps zero, so what is preventing the stars from being pulled towards the center? Do spherical ellipticals flatten with time?

http://www.scienceworldreport.com/a...nt-elliptical-galaxies-move-slowly-surely.htm
A galaxy's overall shape cannot change without friction. If a galaxy has enough dust in it, the friction between the dust and the stars will pull the stars into a disk (a spiral galaxy). If there isn't enough dust, the stars just continue in their individual orbits and the overall shape of the galaxy remains relatively unchanged (until the galaxy collides with another).
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn
  • #3
The article explains that the velocities refer to the bulk rotation. It's what you get when you average velocities of all stars. In elliptical galaxies stars go every which way, each individual one having large enough velocity to remain in orbit around the centre of galactic mass. In other words, if you had two stars going in opposite directions, their average velocity would be 0km/s.

The discovery the article mentions reveals that the bulk rotation is not actually 0 as previously thought.
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn
  • #4
Thanks for confirming Chalnoth, I think I worked out that one independently, because I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals, and I don't ever recall reading that spherical ellipticals could become spirals again.

Thanks for confirming bandersnatch, so the individual star velocities are high enough to maintain relative orbital positions.
 
  • #5
Tanelorn said:
Thanks for confirming Chalnoth, I think I worked out that one independently, because I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals, and I don't ever recall reading that spherical ellipticals could become spirals again.

Thanks for confirming bandersnatch, so the individual star velocities are high enough to maintain relative orbital positions.
I think usually they remain elliptical because they just don't have any significant amount of dust to cause friction any longer. This is an active area of research, but I think it's generally expected that the behavior of the supermassive black hole at the galaxy's center is critical in determining the shape of the galaxy (when the supermassive black hole gets too bright, it strips the galaxy of dust).
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn
  • #6
Tanelorn said:
I had read spherical ellipticals are later stage galaxies following collisions of spirals

That was conventional wisdom, but it seems it has been challenged the last decade and now seems iffy with new observations targeted at the process:

"Conventional wisdom (based on computer simulations from the 1970s) said that when two big disk-shaped galaxies merged, they’d create a big elliptical, a fairly featureless spheroid of stars.

But about a decade ago, new-and-improved simulations by several teams suggested that, if the disk galaxies have a lot of gas, the object their merger creates will also be a disk galaxy, with spiral arms or maybe even a bar in the center.

The reason is angular momentum. In a galaxy’s disk, stars and gas rotate together around the galactic center. When the disk galaxies merge and their material mixes, the stars can steal rotational energy from the gas via gravitational interactions, begetting a bulbous shape — but gas doesn’t steal from other gas. Instead, gas from both galaxies “shares” rotational energy. When there aren’t enough stars to steal the gas’s angular momentum, the material will inevitably settle down and create a disk in the newly formed galaxy."

"[Detailed description of observations. Then:] In short, roughly half (46%) of the galaxies created by mergers are disk galaxies. The team can’t actually confirm that the galaxies that created the 37 they observed were also disk-shaped — but given that the long-gone progenitors had a whole lot of gas and the right rotational properties to create gas disks, it’s not crazy to connect the result with predictions for disks’ mergers.

Regardless, the observations confirm that, indeed, disks are a common byproduct of galaxy mergers. That makes sense: big spirals are the most common type of galaxy in today’s universe, and so the fact that mergers can create them helps explain why."

[ http://www.skyandtelescope.com/astronomy-news/mergers-create-disk-galaxies-10022014/ ]

There is also a nice simulation that shows the merger-into-disk process.

TL;DR: What Chalnoth said.
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn
  • #7
Thanks Torbjorn, so would ellipticals happen after several mergers when the galaxies have become very large, or perhaps when two equal sized galaxies collide which are rotating opposite to each other, canceling out their angular momentums?
 
  • #8
Tanelorn said:
Thanks Torbjorn, so would ellipticals happen after several mergers when the galaxies have become very large,

You are welcome!

If the conventional wisdom is incorrect, they would tend to happen because they are running out of gas over time (so could have time to participate in several mergers and grow large) and because their supermassive central black holes would tend to be disturbed, tend to interact, tend to grow and tend to scatter gas as Chalnoth describes.

Mostly I thought the article was timely supporting what Chalnoth had said.

Tanelorn said:
or perhaps when two equal sized galaxies collide which are rotating opposite to each other, canceling out their angular momentums?

It could perhaps happen, but the collision in itself would result in some excess angular momentum. (See their animation.)

Cancellation would be a very low likelihood result.
 
  • #9
Chalnoth said:
A galaxy's overall shape cannot change without friction.
Differential angular velocities of different parts are sufficient for shape changes. Or the dynamics of mass concentrations in spiral galaxies.
 
  • Like
Likes Tanelorn

Related to Why do large elliptical galaxies not collapse due to their gravity?

1. Why do large elliptical galaxies not collapse due to their gravity?

Large elliptical galaxies have a high amount of mass, which creates a strong gravitational pull. However, they also have a large amount of kinetic energy due to the random motions of their stars. This kinetic energy counteracts the gravitational pull, preventing the galaxy from collapsing.

2. What role do dark matter and dark energy play in preventing collapse?

Dark matter is a type of matter that does not interact with light, making it invisible to telescopes. It is thought to make up a large portion of the mass in elliptical galaxies and provides additional gravitational pull to counteract collapse. Dark energy, on the other hand, is a mysterious force that is causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. This expansion also counteracts the gravitational pull of large elliptical galaxies, preventing collapse.

3. How do supermassive black holes affect the stability of large elliptical galaxies?

Many large elliptical galaxies have supermassive black holes at their centers. These black holes have an extremely strong gravitational pull, but they also play a crucial role in regulating the galaxy's growth. As matter falls into the black hole, it releases a huge amount of energy, which can push surrounding gas and dust away and prevent it from falling into the central region of the galaxy and causing collapse.

4. Can the shape of a large elliptical galaxy affect its stability?

Yes, the shape of a large elliptical galaxy can affect its stability. Galaxies that are more spherical tend to have a more stable structure, as the stars are distributed more evenly throughout. On the other hand, galaxies that are more elongated or have a more complex shape may have a less stable structure, as the stars in these galaxies may have more random orbits that can contribute to collapse.

5. Are there any other factors besides gravity that can prevent collapse in large elliptical galaxies?

Yes, there are other factors that can contribute to the stability of large elliptical galaxies. One important factor is the presence of star formation. When stars are actively forming, they release a lot of energy in the form of radiation and stellar winds. This energy can push surrounding gas and dust away, preventing it from falling into the galaxy and contributing to collapse. Additionally, the presence of magnetic fields can also play a role in regulating the gas and dust in a galaxy, preventing it from collapsing under its own gravity.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
419
Replies
72
Views
6K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
23K
  • Poll
  • Cosmology
Replies
18
Views
5K
Back
Top