Which method is best for GCL assay and Why?

  • Thread starter TytoAlba95
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Method
In summary, the conversation discusses two protocols for estimating GLutamate Cysteine ligase assay. Protocol 1 involves measuring inorganic phosphate through a reaction with Ferrous sulphate-ammonium molybdate reagent, while Protocol 2 is a double coupled enzyme assay. The speaker believes that the double coupled enzyme assay is better because it estimates the decrease in NADH, which can be subtracted from the basal level present in the tissue extract. A link to the original paper for Protocol 1 is also provided.
  • #1
TytoAlba95
132
19
I'm trying to choose a protocol for estimating GLutamate Cysteine ligase assay. I've two of them.
Reaction:
L-glutamate + L-cysteine + ATP
\rightleftharpoons
gamma-glutamyl cysteine + ADP + Pi

#Protocol 1: Dasgupta 2007
Though this method, the author has estimated GCL activity by measuring a blue coloured compound formed by a reaction between Pi and Ferrous sulphate-ammonium molybdate reacgent. She has basicially estimated Phosphate.

#Protocol 2: Seelig 1985
It is a coupled enzyme assay.
The enzyme activity is measured in reaction mixtures containing L-glutamate, L-a-aminobutyrate, and ATP by a coupled enzyme procedure in which the rate of formation of ADP, in the presence of pyruvate kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphoenolpyruvate, and NADH, is obtained from the decrease in the absorbance of NADH at 340 nm.

Which one of these is better and why?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
My take on :
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Which one of these is better and why?

I think doing the double coupled enzyme assay is better over estimating the inorganic phosphate. Because inorganic phosphate is rather ubiquitous and the coupled enzyme assay will estimate the decrease in NADH which is supplied from outside and added to the basal level of NADH present in the tissue extract, which can be substracted.

#Here's a link (Taussky 1953) to the original paper from which Protocol 1 is derived.
 

Related to Which method is best for GCL assay and Why?

1. What is the GCL assay method and why is it important in scientific research?

The GCL (glutamate-cysteine ligase) assay method is a biochemical technique used to measure the activity of the enzyme glutamate-cysteine ligase, which is responsible for the first step in glutathione synthesis. Glutathione is an important antioxidant and plays a crucial role in cellular defense against oxidative stress. Therefore, the GCL assay is important in understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in antioxidant defense and oxidative stress-related diseases.

2. What are the different methods for performing GCL assay and how do they differ?

There are several methods for performing GCL assay, including spectrophotometric, fluorometric, and HPLC-based methods. These methods differ in the type of detection and quantification techniques used, as well as the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Spectrophotometric methods use absorbance measurements, while fluorometric methods use fluorescence measurements. HPLC-based methods involve separation and quantification of individual components using high-performance liquid chromatography.

3. Which method is considered the gold standard for GCL assay and why?

The HPLC-based method is considered the gold standard for GCL assay due to its high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. This method allows for the separation and quantification of individual components, providing more precise measurements of GCL activity. It also has the ability to detect a wider range of glutathione species, making it more comprehensive than other methods.

4. What factors should be considered when choosing a method for GCL assay?

When choosing a method for GCL assay, factors such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, reproducibility, and cost should be considered. The specific research question and sample type should also be taken into account. For example, if the sample is limited, a more sensitive method may be preferred. Additionally, the availability of equipment and expertise in a particular method should also be considered.

5. Are there any limitations or challenges associated with GCL assay methods?

Yes, there are some limitations and challenges associated with GCL assay methods. One of the main challenges is the potential interference from other compounds in the sample, which can affect the accuracy of the results. Another limitation is the need for specialized equipment and expertise, which may not be available in all research settings. Additionally, different methods may have different sensitivities and specificities, which can lead to variations in results.

Similar threads

Are My Glycolysis Answers Detailed and Correct?
    • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Optical Density of Compound X: Calculate Molar Extinction Coeff.
    • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Glycolysis & Creb Cycle Biochemistry
    • Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
14K
Studies on racial differences
    • General Discussion
Replies
25
Views
13K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top