- #1
confusedashell
- 125
- 0
I've been reading a lot upon the MWI and to my surprise there are more than just 1 interpretation of the "many worlds".
I read a article in the skeptical inquirer where the current was found:
If all these countless billions of parallel universes are taken as no more than abstract mathematical entities-worlds that could have formed but didn't-then the only "real" world is the one we are in. In this interpretation of the MWI the theory becomes little more than a new and whimsical language for talking about QM. It has the same mathematical formalism, makes the same predictions. This is how Hawking and many others who favor the MWI interpret it. They prefer it because they believe it is a language that simplifies QM talk, and also sidesteps many of its paradoxes.
To me this seems more realistic and "sane" than the bizarre version David Deutsch insists on.
This is also what my friend told me 1 year ago when we discussed QM's, but I never understood it, when I think MWI i only think constant splitting, but now I learn splitting is science fiction not reality in this interpretation.
So could anyone explain this "version" in layman terms?
Also why is it still called MWI, when there's only "one world" ? l
Thanks
I read a article in the skeptical inquirer where the current was found:
If all these countless billions of parallel universes are taken as no more than abstract mathematical entities-worlds that could have formed but didn't-then the only "real" world is the one we are in. In this interpretation of the MWI the theory becomes little more than a new and whimsical language for talking about QM. It has the same mathematical formalism, makes the same predictions. This is how Hawking and many others who favor the MWI interpret it. They prefer it because they believe it is a language that simplifies QM talk, and also sidesteps many of its paradoxes.
To me this seems more realistic and "sane" than the bizarre version David Deutsch insists on.
This is also what my friend told me 1 year ago when we discussed QM's, but I never understood it, when I think MWI i only think constant splitting, but now I learn splitting is science fiction not reality in this interpretation.
So could anyone explain this "version" in layman terms?
Also why is it still called MWI, when there's only "one world" ? l
Thanks
Last edited: