What is the best interpretation of this collision graphic?

In summary, the conversation discusses a cartoon used in articles on Proton/Lead and Proton/Proton collisions. The gray disks represent the colliding nuclei, which are Lorentz contracted due to their high speeds. The colored bars represent the strong color fields, a non-perturbative phenomenon in QCD. This leads to the formation of color flux tubes, resulting in a string tension between quarks. The cartoon is meant to depict this phenomenon, showing the difficulty in separating quarks within a hadron.
  • #1
edguy99
Gold Member
450
28
A recent article on Proton/Lead collisions (http://physics.aps.org/articles/v8/61) used a graphic seen in earlier articles on Proton/Proton collisions (ie. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1206.0148v1.pdf). I understand the gray disks to represent protons just after the collision (flattened due to relativity at their high speeds), but I am not sure how to understand the colored bars. Appreciate insight anyone would have on this.

ProtonCollision.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Well, this is a cartoon which is somewhat popular in the heavy-ion community. We draw disks for the colliding nuclei, because we consider them as highly Lorentz contracted, which is of course true, but you'd never see them like this "pancakes", because you have to take into account also the retardation effects of the light emitted from the object, and doing so this leads to a rotation rather like seeing Lorentz contracted objects. This was made clear already in the early 50ies by Weisskopf. If needed, I can find the reference.

Put this aside, the cartoon is pretty intuitive. The colored bars represent the very strong color fields. Due to confinement, which is a non-perturbative phenomenon, the force doesn't behave as naively expected from a massless vector field. In QED you'd have some Coulomb force, but the electromagnetic interaction is not confining, because the photons are not charged themselves. The gluons, as the quanta of the color-gauge field in QCD, themselves carry color charges, which leads to the completely different behavior. If you have two (heavy) quarks, you have to overcome a strong force, which is described by a potential like
$$V_{\text{eff}}(r)=-\frac{k}{r}+\sigma r.$$
The latter term is non-perturbative and the picture is that color flux tubes form, leading to the string tension ##\sigma##. Phenomenologically if you try to pull quarks within a hadron appart, you'll not be able to separate them and observe just free quarks but you need to put more and more energy into the system to overcome the string tension. At one point the strings break, and you create more colorless hadrons instead of freeing the quarks. This is roughly what's intended to be depicted by these colored flux tubes.
 
  • Like
Likes edguy99

Related to What is the best interpretation of this collision graphic?

1. What does the collision graphic represent?

The collision graphic represents the interaction or impact between two or more objects in a given system.

2. How is the best interpretation of the collision graphic determined?

The best interpretation of the collision graphic is determined by analyzing the physical characteristics and properties of the objects involved, as well as the laws of physics governing the collision.

3. What factors should be considered when interpreting the collision graphic?

Factors such as the mass, velocity, and direction of the objects, as well as any external forces or friction, should be considered when interpreting the collision graphic.

4. Can the collision graphic be used to predict the outcome of future collisions?

Yes, the collision graphic can be used to make predictions about the outcome of future collisions, as long as the same physical properties and conditions are maintained.

5. How does the interpretation of the collision graphic contribute to scientific understanding?

The interpretation of the collision graphic can provide valuable insights and help to further our understanding of the fundamental principles of physics and how objects behave in different systems and environments.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
72
Views
7K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top