- #1
Carlos L. Janer
- 114
- 3
Is it conceivable that dark matter only interacts gravitationally? Is SUSY losing her charm? I truly want to know what the experts think. I'm not qualified to have an informed opinion about this subject.
If it only interacts gravitationally it would be very difficult to find a theory for how it is created in the right amount in the early Universe. This does not mean that it needs to interact weakly or even with a strength that is of the same order as the weak interactions. There are many models of dark matter where its creation is not attributed to thermal freeze-out.Carlos L. Janer said:Is it conceivable that dark matter only interacts gravitationally?
To some extent yes in the sense that the more simple and "natural" SUSY models have been ruled out. However, there still remain large parts of parameter space that is still fine so it is certainly possible that there is SUSY. It may just be that it is not so wonderfully elegant as may have been portrayed by SUSY proponents before the LHC turned on.Carlos L. Janer said:Is SUSY losing her charm?
Orodruin said:There are many models of dark matter where its creation is not attributed to thermal freeze-out.
mfb said:For the big bang, both are relevant.
It is not a full combination, as he did not quantize gravity. QFT on curved spacetime is tricky, but some simple results (like the emission of radiation) can be done there as well.Carlos L. Janer said:- How did Hawking managed to combine general relativity and particle physics to predict that a black hole emits radiation?
mfb said:It is not a full combination, as he did not quantize gravity. QFT on curved spacetime is tricky, but some simple results (like the emission of radiation) can be done there as well.
You can write it down. The question is can you also calculate it.Carlos L. Janer said:Is there any consistent formulation of QFT in a curved space-time?
mfb said:You can write it down.
Orodruin said:I suggest starting by reading up on a set of lecture notes regarding QFT in curved spacetime, eg, https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9707062
That's a question about personality. To those being on the hunt for quick and short answers? Probably.Carlos L. Janer said:Thank you very much for the tip. I just have one question: Am I talking nonsense? Is this a dead-end path?
fresh_42 said:That's a question about personality. To those being on the hunt for quick and short answers? Probably.
However, those who gets inflamed by the idea and want to find out, what's behind it, it might as well be the start of a career in physics.
if it was "normal" matter we would be able to see it.Gerhard Mueller said:hint ... that dark matter can't be normal matter?
still they don't add up...Gerhard Mueller said:.This is related to the question of the possible cosmological origin of such kind of objects.
Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that is believed to make up about 85% of the total mass of the universe. It does not emit or absorb light, making it invisible to telescopes, but its presence can be inferred through its gravitational effects on visible matter.
WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles) are one of the leading candidates for dark matter. They are theoretical particles that interact very weakly with ordinary matter and have a mass in the range of 10 to 100 times that of a proton.
While WIMPs have been the most widely studied and accepted explanation for dark matter, there is still no conclusive evidence for their existence. Other theories, such as Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) or primordial black holes, suggest alternative explanations for the observed gravitational effects of dark matter.
Scientists study dark matter through a variety of methods, including observing its gravitational effects on visible matter, searching for evidence of WIMPs through particle accelerators, and studying the cosmic microwave background radiation for patterns that could indicate the presence of dark matter.
If dark matter is unrelated to WIMPs, it would mean that our current understanding of the universe is incomplete and that there are other unknown forms of matter that make up the majority of the universe's mass. It would also require a re-evaluation of current theories and models about the formation and evolution of the universe.