What do you think about these two textbooks?

  • Thread starter Wong
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Textbooks
In summary, "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai are considered to be standard textbooks for graduate studies in their respective fields. While Jackson may require more work to understand, it is good for learning mathematical techniques for solving EM problems. On the other hand, Sakurai is a more modern text with a focus on bra-ket notation, and may not be suitable as a first text for quantum mechanics. However, both are highly recommended and considered to be essential resources for physicists.
  • #1
Wong
80
0
Hi all,

What do you think about "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai? I heard some people say both of them are quite difficult/abstract. I would like to see if it is a good idea to buy them both for my courses.

Thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Jackson has been the standard text for Graduate Electromagnetics/Dynamics for nearly 40 years. It takes a bunch of work to feel comfortable with the material in it, i.e. you have to do most of the problems and rework most of the theory in the text in detail.

As for Sakurai, I took many courses in Qantum Mechanics and still have difficulty doing all of the problems. It is a more modern text as opposed to Messiah or Mertzbacher and maybe that is my problem, I never learned to work with bra-ket notaion comfortably.


The more you study them, the more you will learn. Both are useful texts to have around, just as Goldstein is for Mechanics.

DT
 
  • #3
Jackson teaches you the mathematical techniques for solving EM problems, and is good at that.

I would not recommend Sakurai as a first Q.Mech text - start off with Cohen-Tannoudji or the like, and if you want harder problems, look at Sakurai.
 
  • #4
Wong said:
Hi all,

What do you think about "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson and "Modern Quantum Mechanics" by Sakurai? I heard some people say both of them are quite difficult/abstract. I would like to see if it is a good idea to buy them both for my courses.

Thanks a lot.
By both of them, as far as I believe not know, they are all good textbooks, this is what i have just asked several people here,

but first of all, you need to TAKE ALL THE BASICS ABOUT THOSE, TAKE THEM ALL,
so you have to take a look at YOUR LIBRARY again.

and TRY TO SEARCH AND ASK THEM TO DELIVER MUCH MORE MUCH MORE RELATED SOURCES.
I also learn LOTS from those SOURCES, true!

Stop thinking about other subjects you know, and you have to concentrate on THOSE SOURCES.

All in all, both of the books above are good. But again, DELIVERY MUST be much more.
Understand ?
 
  • #5
Thanks for all the replies.

At last, I bought both of them, because there is only one copy of each in the library and so I cannot "borrow them through" the whole semester. In fact I think they are quite expensive, considering that I may get a good hardcover (with nice pics) on other subjects with the same money I spent.

I read the first chapter of Sakurai briefly. I do not quite like his style of presentation. The derivations are rigorous, but the materials are not as clearly presented and "well-organised" as in a mathematical text. But I still think it is delightful as a textbook.
 
  • #6
They are both bibles of the graduate study. Every physicist should have one copy of these books.
 

Related to What do you think about these two textbooks?

1. What makes these two textbooks stand out from others in the field?

These two textbooks are unique in that they approach the subject matter from different perspectives, providing a well-rounded understanding of the topic. Additionally, they both incorporate the latest research and advancements in the field, making them more comprehensive and up-to-date than other textbooks.

2. How do these two textbooks differ from each other?

While these two textbooks cover the same topic, they may differ in terms of their organization, level of detail, and teaching style. One may focus more on theoretical concepts while the other may have more practical applications. It is important to carefully assess your learning needs to determine which textbook would be most beneficial for you.

3. Are these two textbooks suitable for both beginners and advanced learners?

Yes, these textbooks are designed to be accessible for both beginners and advanced learners. They provide a solid foundation for those new to the subject, while also delving into more complex concepts and theories for advanced learners.

4. How do these textbooks incorporate new research and developments in the field?

Both textbooks are regularly updated to include the latest research and advancements in the field. They may also provide access to online resources or supplementary materials that cover recent developments in the subject.

5. Can these textbooks be used as a standalone resource for learning about this topic?

While these textbooks provide a comprehensive overview of the topic, it is always beneficial to supplement your learning with other resources such as academic articles, research papers, or online lectures. These textbooks can serve as a strong foundation, but further exploration and research will deepen your understanding of the subject.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
485
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
315
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
989
Back
Top