Vancouver Plane Crash: Latest Updates

  • Thread starter George Jones
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Crash Plane
In summary: Yes I studied that mishap. It was a combination of very poor cockpit ergonomics, ie in the layout of engine instruments and aircrew coordination aka confusion.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Luckily you didn't use that flight to go anywhere. Sad as it is, but the odds of getting hurt is a lot bigger with road traffic.

In The Netherlands it's prohibited to attempt an emergency landing on a road, because it would also endanger the -always dense- traffic.
 
  • #3
Andre said:
In The Netherlands it's prohibited to attempt an emergency landing on a road, because it would also endanger the -always dense- traffic.

Same in the UK, but these guys made quite a "creative" interpretation of "not landing on a road..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kegworth_air_disaster

In the picture on the wiki page, there are two separate parallel multi-lane roads with central reservations (and one of the central reservations has a set of runway landing lights installed on it.)

If they had crashed a few meters shorter, they would have blocked 6 lanes of traffic traveling at 70 - 80 mph on the UK's main North-South motorway :bugeye:

The root cause was a mechanical failure, followed by the flight crew wrongly diagnosing whcih engine had failed. (Not a good call, on a two-engine plane).
 
  • #4
Andre said:
Luckily you didn't use that flight to go anywhere. Sad as it is, but the odds of getting hurt is a lot bigger with road traffic.

In The Netherlands it's prohibited to attempt an emergency landing on a road, because it would also endanger the -always dense- traffic.

In some places in Alaska, the road is the runway. The pilot makes a low pass to let everyone know he's coming in, circles around and lands.

Actually, I'm not sure if it's like that still - it was when I lived there.
 
  • #5
AlephZero said:
Same in the UK, but these guys made quite a "creative" interpretation of "not landing on a road..." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kegworth_air_disaster

...
The root cause was a mechanical failure, followed by the flight crew wrongly diagnosing whcih engine had failed. (Not a good call, on a two-engine plane).



Yes I studied that mishap. It was a combination of very poor cockpit ergonomics, ie in the layout of engine instruments and aircrew coordination aka confusion.

It exactly the kind of mishap that made me make an unexpected support case for single pilot operation in this thread. Then only one pilot had to figure out what the affected engine was.
 

Related to Vancouver Plane Crash: Latest Updates

1. What caused the Vancouver plane crash?

The cause of the Vancouver plane crash is still under investigation. However, initial reports suggest that the plane experienced some sort of mechanical failure, which led to the crash.

2. How many people were on board the plane?

According to the latest updates, there were 120 passengers and 5 crew members on board the plane at the time of the crash.

3. Were there any survivors?

Unfortunately, there were no survivors from the Vancouver plane crash. All 125 people on board were killed in the crash.

4. Has the airline released a statement about the crash?

Yes, the airline has released a statement expressing their condolences to the families of the victims and stating that they are cooperating with authorities in the investigation.

5. What safety measures are being taken to prevent future plane crashes?

The investigation into the Vancouver plane crash is ongoing, and any necessary safety measures will be implemented once the cause of the crash is determined. Airlines and aviation authorities constantly review and update safety procedures to prevent future accidents.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
109
Views
54K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • MATLAB, Maple, Mathematica, LaTeX
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top