US Pressures Other Countries On Breast Milk/Formula Dispute

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
In summary, the NY Times article discusses how the US threatened trade and military aid to Africa and Latin America countries if they did not withdraw a resolution promoting breast feeding over using formula, which is sold by big western companies. Russia, on the other hand, sponsored the resolution and faced no backlash from the US. The article also mentions the well-known health benefits of breast feeding. Overall, this seems to be a move in support of corporate interests rather than health concerns.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,494
9,808
NY Times article here.
Opposing the promotion of breast feeding over using formula (sold by big western companies), the US threatened trade and military aid to Africa and Latin America countries if they did not with draw a resolution.
Russia, seizing the moral high ground, sponsored the resolution and got no apparent blow back from the US.

Breast feeding has many, well known, health benefits (see links in the article).

This seems to be an aggressive move, by the US, in support of corporate interests and away from health concerns!
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters, Tosh5457 and S.G. Janssens
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Thread closed for Moderation...
 
  • #3
After discussions via PM, this thread will need to remain closed, unfortunately. We have had to disallow political discussions at the PF recently because they are so hard to Moderate well. Please have a look at Bill's link for more information and more links to read. Thanks.
 
Last edited:

Related to US Pressures Other Countries On Breast Milk/Formula Dispute

What is the breast milk/formula dispute?

The breast milk/formula dispute refers to a recent controversy involving the United States pressuring other countries to water down a resolution that promotes breastfeeding over formula feeding for infants.

Why is this dispute important?

This dispute is important because breastfeeding has been proven to provide numerous health benefits for both infants and mothers, while formula feeding can have negative health effects and can be costly for families.

What is the role of the United States in this dispute?

The United States was accused of using strong-arm tactics and threats to discourage other countries from supporting the original resolution, which was sponsored by the World Health Organization.

What are the potential consequences of this dispute?

If other countries are pressured to water down the resolution or withdraw their support, it could lead to a decrease in breastfeeding rates and potentially harm the health of infants and mothers around the world.

What can be done to address this dispute?

The World Health Organization and other organizations are working to raise awareness about the importance of breastfeeding and to counteract any negative influence from the United States. It is also important for individuals to educate themselves and advocate for policies that support breastfeeding.

Similar threads

News Should the US intervene in world problems?
    • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
9K
News The Roots of Terrorism and US Foreign Policy
    • General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
5K
News Renaissance and reaction to Islam.
    • General Discussion
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
News What do you think about the deal with North Korea?
    • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
News Bush Administration: My Indictment
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
3K
ECONOMICS: It's stupid to be afraid (Lee Kuan Yew to Der Spiegel)
    • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
    • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top