Understanding the Cauchy Integral Theorem for Conjugate Functions

In summary: I like it, but then I'm not trying to learn the material for the first time.In summary, the conversation discusses solving an integral over a curve using different methods and the concept of analyticity. The suggested method is to break up the integral into real integrals, while the use of Cauchy theorem is recommended for a more direct solution. The conversation also ends with a request for recommended mathematical books on the topic.
  • #1
sahil_time
108
0

Homework Statement



∮ dz/(2 - z*) over Curve |z|=1?

where z* = conjugate of z

How to solve this?

Homework Equations



I tried doing by taking z*=e^(-iθ) , the answer was zero
Then i did it by taking z*=1/z which gives ∏i/2.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Why would you take z*= 1/z??
 
  • #3
sahil_time said:

Homework Statement



∮ dz/(2 - z*) over Curve |z|=1?

where z* = conjugate of z

How to solve this?

Homework Equations



I tried doing by taking z*=e^(-iθ) , the answer was zero
Then i did it by taking z*=1/z which gives ∏i/2.


The Attempt at a Solution


So you are taking z=e^(iθ), I hope. Both of those should give you the same answer and i*pi/2 looks like the right one. What did you do to get zero the first time?
 
  • #4
Yes, i did take z*=e^(-iθ).
then ∫dz/(2-e^(-iθ)) = ∫ e^(iθ)/( 2e^(iθ) - 1)dz

taking 2e^(iθ) -1 = t
2ie^(iθ)dθ = dt

But limits 0 →2π change to 1→1
Therefore ans is zero!

What i think is that the function is not analytic, therefore we cannot
integrate over 0→2π directly. We must break the limits. For eg: if you
take 0→π and multiply the Whole Integral by 2, you will get the ans as
∏i/2. But i cannot see any reason as to why the function ceases to be
"non analytic".

Thankyou. :)
 
  • #5
ceases to be "analytic" *
 
  • #6
HallsofIvy said:
Why would you take z*= 1/z??

Yes because we are integrating the function along the curve
i.e the line integral. So because |z|=1 and since z=re^(iθ)
hence r=1.
 
  • #7
sahil_time said:
Yes, i did take z*=e^(-iθ).
then ∫dz/(2-e^(-iθ)) = ∫ e^(iθ)/( 2e^(iθ) - 1)dz

taking 2e^(iθ) -1 = t
2ie^(iθ)dθ = dt

But limits 0 →2π change to 1→1
Therefore ans is zero!

What i think is that the function is not analytic, therefore we cannot
integrate over 0→2π directly. We must break the limits. For eg: if you
take 0→π and multiply the Whole Integral by 2, you will get the ans as
∏i/2. But i cannot see any reason as to why the function ceases to be
"non analytic".

Thankyou. :)

The big problem is that doing the integral gives you a log(t) term. log is not a single valued function. You could assign log(1)=0, or 2*pi*i, or 4*pi*i or any other multiple of 2pi. So just because t goes from 1 to 1 you can't say the integral is zero. You can't do the complex integral that way. The safest way to do it would be to break it up into real integrals and do them.

On the other hand using the Cauchy theorem is gives you the correct answer much more easily.

BTW z* is not analytic. But z*=1/z on the unit circle. So the contour integral of both should come out the same.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Thanx alot! But can you suggest some good mathematical books which
explains these advanced concepts in proper detail.?

Thanx again! :)
 
  • #9
sahil_time said:
Thanx alot! But can you suggest some good mathematical books which
explains these advanced concepts in proper detail.?

Thanx again! :)

You are welcome. Here's a link to some peoples opinions on good texts. https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=243903 I used the Conway book, but I didn't comparison shop a lot.
 

Related to Understanding the Cauchy Integral Theorem for Conjugate Functions

1. What is the Cauchy Integral Theorem?

The Cauchy Integral Theorem, also known as the Cauchy-Goursat Theorem, is a fundamental theorem in complex analysis that states that if a function is analytic inside and on a simple closed contour, then the integral of that function over the contour is equal to zero.

2. Who discovered the Cauchy Integral Theorem?

The Cauchy Integral Theorem was discovered by Augustin-Louis Cauchy, a French mathematician, in the early 19th century. However, it was later refined and expanded upon by other mathematicians such as Joseph-Louis Lagrange and Pierre-Simon Laplace.

3. What is the significance of the Cauchy Integral Theorem?

The Cauchy Integral Theorem is significant because it allows for the evaluation of complex integrals without having to use complex techniques such as contour integration. It also has many applications in physics, engineering, and other fields that involve complex functions.

4. How is the Cauchy Integral Theorem related to the Cauchy-Riemann equations?

The Cauchy Integral Theorem is closely related to the Cauchy-Riemann equations, which are a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for a function to be analytic. In fact, the Cauchy Integral Theorem can be derived from the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

5. Can the Cauchy Integral Theorem be extended to higher dimensions?

Yes, the Cauchy Integral Theorem can be extended to higher dimensions through the use of multivariate calculus and complex analysis. This allows for the evaluation of integrals over surfaces and volumes in more than two dimensions.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
896
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
607
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
933
Back
Top