- #1
fhenryco
- 63
- 5
Hi,
I want to be sure i understand correctly the implications of problem 2 in:
http://universeinproblems.com/index.php/Time-dependent_Cosmological_Constant
"when G is constant, Lambda is also a constant if and only if the ordinary energy-momentum tensor Tμν is also conserved "
As far as i know the ordinary energy momentum tensor covariant conservation is granted as soon as the corresponding fields :
1) have their own scalar action
2) are fully dynamical in this action e.g. their equations of motion are derived from them extremizing the action
so the case corresponding to a cosmological constant and matter fields exchanging energy (subject of next problem 3 ) implicitely imply that either the theory is not diffeomorphism invariant (1 not satisfied: which for me does not make any sense) or somehow the dynamics of the matter fields does not only follow from the action e.g. the fields are not completely dynamical in the usual sense: this is a bit less shocking for me ... but still very unusual
Do others confirm i understand correctly the implications of a time varying cosmological constant in GR ?
I want to be sure i understand correctly the implications of problem 2 in:
http://universeinproblems.com/index.php/Time-dependent_Cosmological_Constant
"when G is constant, Lambda is also a constant if and only if the ordinary energy-momentum tensor Tμν is also conserved "
As far as i know the ordinary energy momentum tensor covariant conservation is granted as soon as the corresponding fields :
1) have their own scalar action
2) are fully dynamical in this action e.g. their equations of motion are derived from them extremizing the action
so the case corresponding to a cosmological constant and matter fields exchanging energy (subject of next problem 3 ) implicitely imply that either the theory is not diffeomorphism invariant (1 not satisfied: which for me does not make any sense) or somehow the dynamics of the matter fields does not only follow from the action e.g. the fields are not completely dynamical in the usual sense: this is a bit less shocking for me ... but still very unusual
Do others confirm i understand correctly the implications of a time varying cosmological constant in GR ?