The use of the dx in the quantum state vector integral

In summary, the conversation discusses the expansion of the quantum state vector and the use of the completeness relation in terms of the position-wave function. The wavefunction can be decomposed in terms of the position-wave function and the trailing dx in each term represents the completeness relation. This concept is similar to the decomposition of vectors in a finite-dimensional Euclidean vector space with respect to a Cartesian basis.
  • #1
etotheipi
As a simple example, the probability of measuring the position between [itex]x[/itex] and [itex]x + dx[/itex] is [itex]|\psi(x)|^{2} dx[/itex] since [itex]|\psi(x)|^{2}[/itex] is the probability density. So summing [itex]|\psi(x)|^{2} dx[/itex] between any two points within the boundaries yields the required probability.

The integral I'm confused about is the expansion of the quantum state vector, like so$$\left| \psi \right> = \int \psi(x) \left| x \right> dx$$If the wavefunction were defined between 0 and 1, and I were to take the left Riemann sum (not rigorously, but just vaguely for explanation purposes), I would get $$\left| \psi \right> = \psi(0) \left| 0 \right> dx + \psi(dx) \left| dx \right> dx + \psi(2dx) \left| 2dx \right> dx + ...$$What is the purpose of the trailing [itex]dx[/itex] in each term (i.e. which part does it multiply to), or is this the completely wrong way to think about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This makes use of the socalled completeness relation,
$$\int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x |x \rangle \langle x|=\hat{1},$$
i.e., you can decompose any ket ##|\psi \rangle## in terms of the position-wave function, ##\psi(x)=\langle x|\psi \rangle##,
$$|\psi \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x |x \rangle \langle x|\psi \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d} x |x \rangle \psi(x).$$
It's like the decomposition of vectors in a finite-dimensional Euclidean vector space with respect to some Cartesian basis ##\vec{e}_j##. A vector ##\vec{V}## has components ##V_j=\vec{e}_j \cdot \vec{V}##, and you can decompose the vector in terms of this basis again as
$$\vec{V}=\sum_{j} (\vec{e}_j \cdot \vec{V}) \vec{e}_j = \sum_{j} V_j \vec{e}_j.$$
Also here you have a completeness relation in terms of the tensor product
$$\sum_j \vec{e}_j \otimes \vec{e}_j=\hat{1}.$$
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi

Related to The use of the dx in the quantum state vector integral

1. What is the dx in the quantum state vector integral?

The dx in the quantum state vector integral represents the infinitesimal change in position of a particle in quantum mechanics. It is used to integrate over all possible positions of the particle in a given system.

2. How is the dx used in the quantum state vector integral?

The dx is used as a differential element in the integration process of the quantum state vector. It allows for the calculation of the probability of finding a particle at a specific position in a given system.

3. Why is the dx important in quantum mechanics?

The dx is important in quantum mechanics because it allows for the calculation of the probability distribution of a particle in a given system. It also plays a crucial role in the Schrödinger equation, which describes the time evolution of a quantum state.

4. How does the dx relate to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle?

The dx relates to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle as it represents the uncertainty in the position of a particle in a given system. According to the uncertainty principle, the more precisely we know the position of a particle, the less precisely we know its momentum, and vice versa.

5. Can the dx be used in classical mechanics?

Yes, the dx can also be used in classical mechanics as it represents the infinitesimal change in position. However, in classical mechanics, it is used to integrate over all possible positions of a particle in a given system, while in quantum mechanics, it is used to calculate the probability distribution of a particle's position.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
498
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
15
Views
218
Replies
2
Views
595
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
61
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
970
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
467
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Back
Top