Test your focus/how fast you juggle tasks

  • Thread starter Oerg
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Test
In summary, the conversation discusses the results of a test that measures focus and multitasking abilities. The participants discuss their scores and how they were surprised by them. They also discuss the purpose of the test and its implications for multitaskers. Some participants found the test easy, while others found it difficult due to distractions or a lack of focus. Overall, the conversation highlights the different thought processes between low and high multitaskers and how distractions can impact multitasking abilities.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
100% on both. :smile:
 
  • #3
Borg said:
100% on both. :smile:

Same here. Which surprises me, because I suck at multitasking.
 
  • #4
100% on both. Too easy
 
Last edited:
  • #5
The juggling one... I tried it, switching wasn't a problem, the problem was remembering what was odd and even and vowel and consonant. I got distracted a couple of times through, I'll give it a shot later.
 
  • #6
For the test your focus, I scored 92% and 1.67 with 2 distractions. I scored 100% with 2.00 for 6 distractions.

For the how fast you juggle tasks, I was slower than the low multitaskers, but faster than the high multitaskers. The slowness was slowness in general, as the difference between repeating/switching was less than either. My response time steadily improved for most of the test before becoming worse towards the end of the test (especially for repeating tasks).
 
  • #7
The rectangle one I got 100% on both.
The next one I was the same as the high multitaskers for each of them, except slightly higher on the repeat tasks.
 
  • #8
TubbaBlubba said:
Same here. Which surprises me, because I suck at multitasking.

Then your results shouldn't have been surprising. The test wasn't to test your ability at multitasking. It was to compare the thought processes between low multitaskers and high multitaskers.

People who were high multitaskers tended to be more susceptible to distractions than people who were low multitaskers. The implications of the test being that an inability to focus on the objective at hand without being distracted is part of the reason people become multitaskers.

The results of the "how fast you juggle tasks" should give better results for multitaskers if capability were the main reason people became multitaskers. If you look at the results, multitaskers were slower at juggling tasks regardless of whether they were repeating tasks or switching to a new task. In fact, switching tasks caused more of a delay for them than it did the low multitaskers.

It's a short test, so the results aren't very telling. For example, I don't think extra distractions help my score. I think I probably missed the first "test your focus" question since I was expecting a clear break between the non-scored practice questions and the start of the scored test. I was kind of surprised to realize they were going right into the scored test and had no idea what position the red rectangles were into start. Who knows what other one I missed.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I almost got one wrong cause I was soooooo bored with that test. What is this suppost to show anyhow?

Also had I to double check that Y was a vowel before I took the one test. lol.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
100% on both, I let my eyes loosely focus on the center. That said, I was trained in getting a FSP when shooting, so I don't know that this is a fair test. Years of gaming, shooting, and driving seem to make this effortless.

I don't believe that this test is very telling, for a variety of reasons. Relaxing your focus and letting your periphery do the work probably bypasses the intent of the test. Then again, I do tend to play video games while listening to audio books, or read while listening to music or tv. So...
 
  • #11
BobG said:
Then your results shouldn't have been surprising. The test wasn't to test your ability at multitasking. It was to compare the thought processes between low multitaskers and high multitaskers.

People who were high multitaskers tended to be more susceptible to distractions than people who were low multitaskers. The implications of the test being that an inability to focus on the objective at hand without being distracted is part of the reason people become multitaskers.

The results of the "how fast you juggle tasks" should give better results for multitaskers if capability were the main reason people became multitaskers. If you look at the results, multitaskers were slower at juggling tasks regardless of whether they were repeating tasks or switching to a new task. In fact, switching tasks caused more of a delay for them than it did the low multitaskers.

It's a short test, so the results aren't very telling. For example, I don't think extra distractions help my score. I think I probably missed the first "test your focus" question since I was expecting a clear break between the non-scored practice questions and the start of the scored test. I was kind of surprised to realize they were going right into the scored test and had no idea what position the red rectangles were into start. Who knows what other one I missed.

Oh. Yeah, that makes sense. I can go into very, very, very deep focus when I'm doing stuff.
 
  • #12
Geigerclick said:
I don't believe that this test is very telling, for a variety of reasons. Relaxing your focus and letting your periphery do the work probably bypasses the intent of the test.

One on hand, I disagree, because I scored perfect. :smile:

On the other hand I agree because it was super easy to simply let the red rectangles flood my peripheral vision. Frankly, I could not tell you anything about the non-red rectangles. I couldn't tell you how many there were, I wouldn't even be able to tell you what colour they were. They were simply invisible.
 
  • #13
DaveC426913 said:
One on hand, I disagree, because I scored perfect. :smile:

On the other hand I agree because it was super easy to simply let the red rectangles flood my peripheral vision. Frankly, I could not tell you anything about the non-red rectangles. I couldn't tell you how many there were, I wouldn't even be able to tell you what colour they were. They were simply invisible.

Heh, I know what you mean on both counts. :biggrin:

We all know the people who scored 100% are somehow superior! :wink:
 
  • #14
I think everyone scored 100 so far right?
 
  • #15
I am getting crappy score on the second test because umm.. what's a consonant? :rolleyes:
 
  • #16
100 on both, I found that test very easy. On the other hand, I pretty much never multitask.
 
  • #17
I find it odd that I got 100% finding the test pretty easy to be honest.

I find it odd because I would consider myself a high-multitasker. When I'm on the computer I rarely ever do a single thing. Sometimes I even have 2 computers on playing a game on one while looking up stuff on the other, or doing one thing while reading a book.
Or, as an example, I am watching TV while writing this.
 

Related to Test your focus/how fast you juggle tasks

1. How can I improve my focus and ability to juggle tasks quickly?

Improving focus and multitasking abilities can be achieved through practice and training. Some techniques that can help include setting specific goals, prioritizing tasks, and breaking tasks into smaller, more manageable chunks. Additionally, regular exercise, proper nutrition, and getting enough sleep can also improve overall cognitive function and help with focus.

2. Is multitasking really effective or does it just lead to decreased productivity?

Multitasking can be effective in certain situations, but it can also lead to decreased productivity if not done properly. It's important to prioritize tasks and give each one your full attention for a certain amount of time before moving on to the next. Switching tasks too frequently can actually slow down overall progress and decrease the quality of work.

3. Can multitasking and focus be measured scientifically?

Yes, both multitasking and focus can be measured through various cognitive tests and assessments. These tests can evaluate factors such as reaction time, accuracy, and overall performance while multitasking or focusing on a specific task. These measurements can provide valuable insights into an individual's strengths and areas for improvement.

4. Are certain people naturally better at multitasking and focusing than others?

There is evidence that suggests some individuals may have a higher aptitude for multitasking and focusing than others. However, these skills can also be developed and improved through practice and training. Additionally, external factors such as stress, distractions, and fatigue can also impact an individual's ability to multitask and focus.

5. Can multitasking and focus be improved through technology or brain training games?

While there are many brain training games and apps that claim to improve multitasking and focus, the scientific evidence is inconclusive. Some studies have shown potential benefits, but more research is needed to determine the effectiveness of these methods. It's important to also consider the potential downsides, such as increased screen time and reliance on technology.

Similar threads

Focus all of your ire on me, if you would
    • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
715
How Do You Measure Up on the 4-Variable IQ Test?
    • General Discussion
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
What is the 2-Variable Intuition Test?
    • General Discussion
Replies
20
Views
6K
Are you an "intuitive" or a "reflective"? Quiz sorts us out
    • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
Useless Knowledge Quiz: How Much Pointless Information Do You Really Know?
    • General Discussion
Replies
21
Views
6K
The What Would the Bard Call You? Test
    • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
Do you have Asperger's Syndrome Test
    • General Discussion
3
Replies
85
Views
72K
Is Your Heart Governed by Reason?
    • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
5K
The Do You Know Archaeology Test
    • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
6K
Are You a Deviant? Take This Test to Find Out!
    • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top