String Theory, M-Theory, whatever

In summary, strings have mass that is determined by their vibrations. The type of vibrations also determine what type of particle the string corresponds to. For example, the vibrational mode corresponding to the photon does not carry any mass. It is possible for strings to vibrate in a way that produces energy, and this energy is equivalent to mass. However, string theory is still incomplete and unproven experimentally. Some strings can appear as gravitons while others can appear as photons, and their energy can offset their vibrational energy to result in zero mass particles. There is a connection between energy and mass, as formulated by Einstein, and this can be seen in string theory. Overall, there is still much to be discovered and understood about string
  • #1
Compaq
23
0
Does these strings have mass?

So, everything's made of these strings. Obviously, dark matter would also be made of strings, vibrating to give them certain properties? What makes them vibrate?

Are photons made of strings? If strings have mass, then the mass can't just vanish, if photons are strings..

Could strings vibrate a certain way to be energy? I kow there's a connection between energy and mass, but does energy have mass?

I know, lousy questions. It's just that I'm wondering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, strings have mass, but the amount depends on the way the string is vibrating. This also answers you second question: the type of vibrations determines what type of particle the string corresponds to. In turn, there is a vibriational mode which corresponds to the photon. This vibrational mode does not carry any mass - just like the photon.
 
  • #3
xepma said:
Yes, strings have mass, but the amount depends on the way the string is vibrating. This also answers you second question: the type of vibrations determines what type of particle the string corresponds to. In turn, there is a vibriational mode which corresponds to the photon. This vibrational mode does not carry any mass - just like the photon.

This is interesting, can you maybe elaborate a little on the way in which the vibrational mode determines mass?

Also (if this question makes sense) in these cases does the string actually "have mass"? Or would it be more correct to say that the vibrational energy of the vibrating string is equivalent to a certain amount of mass?
 
  • #4
So, everything's made of these strings. Obviously, dark matter would also be made of strings, vibrating to give them certain properties? What makes them vibrate?

It's possible, but NOT obvious. Not likely in my layman's opiion. Dark matter appears unique in that it's the only matter that does not reflect light...and nobody knows what it is. Dark energy consitutes about 70% of the universe, dark mass about 26% and all common matter (neutrons,protons,electons,etc) only 4%...we know little about 96% of the universe! A guess is that when we figure out dark matter and dark energy we'll have new insights into what constitutes "common" matter.

Quantum jitters (energy) are reflected in overall of string vibration energy...yet quantum jitters of strings alone reflect negative energy!...for the graviton, the energy cancellation between quantum jitters and string vibration energy is perfect...hence a zero mass gravitational like particle emerges.


Are photons made of strings? If strings have mass, then the mass can't just vanish, if photons are strings..

Some strings appear as gravitons, other as photons. Some are bosons (matter particles) some fermions (force particles)...but string theory is incomplete and largely unproven experimentally while it has offered significant insights...in a sense mass CAN vanish becauseit's a reflection of energy and quantum energy can offset string vibrational energy. In field theories, photons are waves (fields); in quantum theory photons are quanta (particles);in string theory, they are vibrating strings...one dimensional bits of energy. Take your pick!

Could strings vibrate a certain way to be energy? I kow there's a connection between energy and mass, but does energy have mass?

yes, energy is equivalent to mass...as formulated by Einstein...His stress energy tensor reflects gravity resulting from mass,energy,stress...in string theory, gravitons and photons, for example, have energy but no mass in accordance with the standard model of particle physics. Higher modes of energy vibrations resuls in higher mass particles.

You can try Brian Greene's books (Fabric of the Cosmos, The Elegant Universe) or Lee Smolin's The Trouble with Physics for good discussions of all this...available in paperback...
 
  • #5
Or would it be more correct to say that the vibrational energy of the vibrating string is equivalent to a certain amount of mass?

I like that better.
 
  • #6
Those interested can find a discussion of string theory in Wikipedia at...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

It jumps right into rather advanced concepts at points, typical of Wikipedia, but you can get a basic idea of some of the ideas used...Greene and Smolin have clearer explanations in my opinion along with interesting insights...

Also I posted a brief discussion thread about how space time might emerge from string theory here in physics forums:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=297908
 

Related to String Theory, M-Theory, whatever

1. What is String Theory?

String Theory is a theoretical framework in physics that attempts to reconcile the theories of general relativity and quantum mechanics. It proposes that the fundamental building blocks of the universe are not point particles, but tiny, vibrating strings.

2. What is the difference between String Theory and M-Theory?

M-Theory is an extension of String Theory that attempts to unify the five different versions of String Theory into one comprehensive theory. It also incorporates the concept of higher dimensions, whereas String Theory only considers the three dimensions of space and one dimension of time.

3. How does String Theory explain the concept of gravity?

In String Theory, gravity is considered to be a force that results from the interactions of strings. These strings create a fabric of space-time, and the curvature of this fabric is what we experience as gravity.

4. Is there any experimental evidence for String Theory?

At this time, there is no experimental evidence for String Theory. However, it is still a widely studied and debated theory in the scientific community, and future experiments and observations may provide evidence to support or disprove it.

5. Why is String Theory considered a candidate for a theory of everything?

String Theory attempts to unify all of the fundamental forces of nature (gravity, electromagnetism, strong and weak nuclear forces) into one comprehensive theory. It also provides a framework for understanding the fundamental particles and their interactions, which could potentially explain the origins of the universe and the laws of physics. However, it is still a developing theory and has not been proven to be the ultimate theory of everything.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
26
Views
869
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top