Strangely Confusing mechanics problem

In summary: Thanks for the clarification, I got it.The angle dependent term is found in Eq (2) as:F=\frac{m_{1}v_{0}}{r_{0}}*a_t=m_{1}v_{0}^{2}*a_t^2 (where a_t is the angle at which the force of friction acts)
  • #1
SelfStudy
7
0
Strangely Confusing mechanics problem!

Homework Statement



2 masses connected by a massless string which passes through a hole in a horizontal table. One mass, [tex]m_{1}[/tex], is sitting on top of the horizontal table, the other, [tex]m_{2}[/tex], hanging below the table. There IS friction between mass [tex]m_{1}[/tex] and the tabletop, coefficient of friction=[tex]\mu[/tex]. Mass [tex]m_{1}[/tex] has initial velocity [tex]v_{0}[/tex] directed perpendicular to the string.

Find the initial radius of the circular motion, the initial rate of energy dissipation, the speed after time T, and the radius after time T

Homework Equations



Newton's Laws, centripetal acceleration, kinetic energy, etc

The Attempt at a Solution



So, as the top mass moves it loses energy to friction and so it's velocity and radius should decrease, the tension in the rope declines as well so the lower mass descends.

The initial radius is found from a free body diagram and Newton's 2nd law. At first (at t=0) the tension balances the weight of M2 and since the tension is what provides the centripetal force I have:

[tex]T=\frac{m_{1}v_{0}^{2}}{r_{0}}=m_{2}g \Rightarrow r_{0}=\frac{m_{1}v_{0}^{2}}{m_{2}g}[/tex]

For the initial energy dissipation,

[tex]P=f\bullet v=\mu m_{1}g v_{0}[/tex]

However, for the speed and radius t seconds later I can't just multiply the power found above by the time, t, because the velocity (and hence the dissipation rate) has changed, right?. I don't know how far the mass has moved so I can't calculate the work done against friction either.

Can anyone suggest a tip?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


Your relationships for T and P continue to hold as r decreases. Since you know v(r), you can calculate the total energy E(r) as a function of r. Differentiating it gives dE/dr. Since you know P=dE/dt, the ratio of these two gives dr/dt, which you can integrate to give r(t). You can then plug that back into get v(t).
 
  • #3


Thank you for the response.

I don't quite follow your suggestion though. The relationship
[tex]T=\frac{m_{1}v_{0}^{2}}{r_{0}}[/tex]
holds, but is not equal to [tex]m_{2} g[/tex] because the tension no longer equals the force of gravity on m2. So I don't think I know v(r), and so can't calculate E(r).
 
  • #4


I'd really appreciate any help on this problem. It's not for homework or anything, I just can't understand where I'm going wrong.

Thanks.
 
  • #5


If m1 is not moving in the circular orbit, what will be the acceleration of m1 ( which is equal to m2) taking into account the frictional force .
By knowing the acceleration of m2, you can find the distance traveled by m2 in time T.
There is no tangential force acting on m1. So its angular momentum is conserved.
Hence I1*ω1 = I1*ω2.
With these hints can you proceed with the problem?
 
  • #6


Thanks rl.bhat

I will try and work it out with your hints, thanks.

However, isn't there a component of friction which acts tangent to the motion of m1?
 
  • #7


I guess what is confusing me is the fact that m1 moves in a spiral, getting closer and closer to the hole in the table. In this case we can't assume that
[tex]T=\frac{m_{1}v^{2}}{r}[/tex]
Is that correct?

Also, because friction acts in the direction that opposes the velocity, there is always a component of friction that is tangent to the motion of m1 so I can't assume that angular momentum is conserved.

The acceleration of m2 is found from:
[tex]T-m_{2}g=m_{2}a \Rightarrow a=\frac{T}{m_{2}}-g[/tex]

But now I don't know T because I can't just use the form of the centripetal force above (m1 isn't moving in a circle and there is a component of friction that acts in the opposite direction of T).

I'm pretty stuck at this point...
 
  • #8


Can't figure this one out! Please help!
 
  • #9


You are right. There is an acceleration in the tangential direction. Using this you can find the angular velocity after time T.
Your method of calculation of acceleration of m2 is not correct. It should be
m2g - T = m2*a...(1)
T - Fr = m1*a...(2) Here Fr is the frictional force.
Now solve the equations to find a.
To find the initial radius, the tangential acceleration need not be considered. Only initial velocity and acceleration of m2 is sufficient.
 
  • #10


Hi,

Yes, my equation for the acceleration of m2 was off by a sign: a should have the same sign as g.

But for Eq (2) I'm a little confused. Newton's 2nd law is a vector equation, so for which component have you written the equation? The force of friction acts at some angle to the tension, correct? So you can write it in terms of a component perpendicular to T and one that points anti-parallel to T. Which means that there should be some angle dependent term attached to the friction force, no?
 
  • #11


m1 is moving tangentially and radially.
Tangential frictional force acts in the opposite direction to the velocity. It does not contribute to the tension. Radial frictional force apposes centripetal force which is the tension in the string. Combination of these two causes the m1 to move in a spiral of reducing radius.
 

Related to Strangely Confusing mechanics problem

1. What is a "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem"?

A "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem" is a type of problem that involves applying principles of mechanics, such as Newton's laws of motion, to a situation that may seem counterintuitive or difficult to understand at first glance.

2. How can I approach solving a "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem"?

The best approach to solving a "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem" is to break it down into smaller, more manageable parts and apply fundamental principles to each part. It is also helpful to draw diagrams and visualize the problem to gain a better understanding of the situation.

3. What skills are necessary to solve a "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem"?

To effectively solve a "Strangely Confusing mechanics problem", one must have a strong understanding of basic mechanics principles, such as forces, motion, and energy. It is also helpful to have good problem-solving skills and the ability to think critically and creatively.

4. Can "Strangely Confusing mechanics problems" have real-world applications?

Yes, many "Strangely Confusing mechanics problems" have real-world applications in fields such as engineering, physics, and technology. These problems help scientists and engineers develop new solutions and innovations by challenging their understanding of mechanics.

5. Are there any tips for mastering "Strangely Confusing mechanics problems"?

Practice is key when it comes to mastering "Strangely Confusing mechanics problems". It is also helpful to work through problems with a study group or seek guidance from a mentor. Additionally, regularly reviewing fundamental principles and concepts can aid in solving these types of problems.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
335
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
659
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
277
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
291
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
97
Views
11K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top