Solving Integral in k-space: \frac{1}{4 \pi}|r-r'|

In summary: For exterior, Res(f)=## \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \lim_{{z}\to{z_0}} \frac{d^{n-1}} {{dz}^{n-1}} (z-z_0)^n f(z) ##, with the integral = ##\infty...$$
  • #1
ognik
643
2

Homework Statement


Hi - this exercise appears in a section on Fourier Transforms.

Show ## \int e^{ik \cdot (r - r')} \frac{d^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3 \vec{k}^2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi}|r-r'| ##
Hint: use spherical coords in k-space.

Homework Equations


I am not sure of the coord. transform, but from the Jacobian I used ##d^3k = k^2 sin \theta dk d\phi d\theta##
Let R=r-r', then ##k \cdot (r - r') = kR cos \theta##

The Attempt at a Solution



## \int e^{ikR cos \theta} \frac{d^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3 \vec{k}^2} = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty} \,dk \int_{0}^{\pi} e^{ikR cos \theta} \,d\theta \int_{0}^{2\pi} \,d\phi ##

Let ## cos \theta = t, \therefore dt = sin \theta d\theta, 1 \le t \le -1 ##

## => \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty} \,dk \int_{1}^{-1} e^{ikR t} \,dt \int_{0}^{2\pi} \,d\phi ##

## = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{ikR t}}{ikR}|^{-1}_1 \,dk ##

##
$ = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-ikR }-e^{ikR }}{ikR}|^{-1}_1 \,dk
= \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{-2 sin(kR)}{kR} \,dk $ ##

Could someone tell me if I have it right so far please, and/or point out any mistakes? (I would then use residues to try and solve the integral)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ognik said:
Show ## \int e^{ik \cdot (r - r')} \frac{d^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3 \vec{k}^2} = \frac{1}{4 \pi}|r-r'| ##
I believe the RHS should be ##\frac{1}{4 \pi |r-r'|}##.

ognik said:
## \int e^{ikR cos \theta} \frac{d^3 k}{(2 \pi)^3 \vec{k}^2} = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^3}\int_{0}^{\infty} \,dk \int_{0}^{\pi} e^{ikR cos \theta} \,d\theta \int_{0}^{2\pi} \,d\phi ##
Where is ##\sin \theta## in the integrand?

ognik said:
Let ## cos \theta = t, \therefore dt = sin \theta d\theta, 1 \le t \le -1 ##
One mistake there about the presence of minus sign.

ognik said:
##
= \frac{1}{(2\pi)^2}\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{e^{-ikR }-e^{ikR }}{ikR}|^{-1}_1 \,dk ##
You have plugged in the integration limits for ##t## in the previous step, therefore you don't need to write "##|_{1}^{-1}##" again

ognik said:
ould someone tell me if I have it right so far please, and/or point out any mistakes?
Except for one technical mistake I have pointed out above, you are right.
 
  • Like
Likes ognik
  • #3
Thanks, silly mistakes copying from my paper ...but I was over-confident about using residue and would appreciate some further guidance.

So I must evaluate ##\frac{1}{4 \pi^2} \int^\infty_0 - \frac{sin kR}{kR} \,dk ## Let k = z, then this has a simple pole at z = 0?

So I would need a contour that goes from 0 to ∞ along the real axis, then maybe a quarter circle in the 1st quadrant - and back to the start down the imaginary axis... but how do I include the pole? Also I know the arc will go to 0 as R tends to ∞, but what does the 3rd part of the path do? Altogether I think I need some help with what path to use please?
 
  • #4
ognik said:
Thanks, silly mistakes copying from my paper ...but I was over-confident about using residue and would appreciate some further guidance.

So I must evaluate ##\frac{1}{4 \pi^2} \int^\infty_0 - \frac{sin kR}{kR} \,dk ## Let k = z, then this has a simple pole at z = 0?

So I would need a contour that goes from 0 to ∞ along the real axis, then maybe a quarter circle in the 1st quadrant - and back to the start down the imaginary axis... but how do I include the pole? Also I know the arc will go to 0 as R tends to ∞, but what does the 3rd part of the path do? Altogether I think I need some help with what path to use please?
There are a couple of ways to integrate ##\textrm{sinc}## function. Apart from using residue theorem, you can also use Fourier transform, or another method, to express ##1/x## in terms of integral of an appropriate exponential function. But since you seem to be insisting on using residue theorem, you can start by remembering that the function ##\frac{\sin x}{x}## is an even function. The integral over semi-infinite ##x## axis is then equal to the half of integral over the entire ##x## axis. The appropriate complex function to calculate this integral is
$$
\int \frac{e^{iz}}{z} dz
$$
The contour should be a semicircle on the upper half of the complex plane. The pole is obviously at ##z=0##, so the contour line will exactly pass through the pole. Then make the radius of the semicircle arbitrarily to infinity because there are no other poles in the upper plane (so are in the lower half). At this point, I hope you know the simple rule for calculating the residue if the corresponding pole lies exactly on the contour line, and especially when there are no more poles than this one which lie on the line.
 
  • #5
blue_leaf77 said:
At this point, I hope you know the simple rule for calculating the residue if the corresponding pole lies exactly on the contour line, and especially when there are no more poles than this one which lie on the line.
I don't think so, the book seems to cover only interior and exterior poles.

For interior I have Res(f)=## \frac{1}{(n-1)!} \lim_{{z}\to{z_0}} \frac{d^{n-1}} {{dz}^{n-1}} (z-z_0)^n f(z) ##, with the integral = ##2\pi i## times the res sum.

I have found suggestions that in the case of the pole on the straight line section of the contour, the residue is just halved, but it is not clear if that is applicable to all orders of poles and/or other contours, are you able to add anything to this?

(For this simple pole I get the final answer of ## \frac{\pi}{R} ## for the integral which fits the expected answer)
 
  • #6
ognik said:
I have found suggestions that in the case of the pole on the straight line section of the contour, the residue is just halved
That's exactly what I meant in the line that you quoted. Another alternative is to directly calculate the contour integral using a contour line formed by halving a donut, taking only the upper half. The inner and outer radii should be centered on the pole. Make the outer radius goes to infinity and the inner one to zero to calculate the integral.
 
  • Like
Likes ognik

Related to Solving Integral in k-space: \frac{1}{4 \pi}|r-r'|

1. What is the purpose of solving integrals in k-space?

Solving integrals in k-space is useful in many areas of science, particularly in physics and engineering. It allows us to analyze and understand complex systems and phenomena, such as the behavior of particles in a magnetic field or the interactions between atoms in a crystal lattice.

2. What does the term "k-space" refer to?

K-space, also known as Fourier space, is a mathematical space that describes the spatial frequency components of a given system. It is commonly used in Fourier analysis, which breaks down a signal or function into its constituent frequencies.

3. How is the integral in k-space related to the integral in real-space?

The integral in k-space is mathematically linked to the integral in real-space through the Fourier transform. The Fourier transform is a mathematical operation that converts a function in real-space into its equivalent representation in k-space, and vice versa.

4. Why is the integral in k-space often represented as \frac{1}{4 \pi}|r-r'|?

This particular representation of the integral in k-space is commonly used in the context of calculating the potential energy of a system. It takes into account the distance between two points (r and r') in the system and the inverse relationship between potential energy and distance.

5. Are there any practical applications of solving integrals in k-space?

Yes, there are many practical applications of solving integrals in k-space. For example, in medical imaging, k-space is used to analyze and reconstruct images from MRI scans. In materials science, it is used to study the atomic and electronic structure of materials. It is also commonly used in signal processing, data compression, and many other fields.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
270
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
264
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
608
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
737
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
460
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
398
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
987
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
981
Back
Top