- #1
Kaspah_2k
- 12
- 0
hey all ,
Why do most physicists always team up with one set of rules when it comes to their understanding of science?
on one side you have the General Relativity group. they use real experiments to calculate the world into one equation (due to calculatable Mathematics)
on the other side you have the quantum mechanics group. who work with uncertainties and unresolvable equations. (due to the volistics of science)
The TOE (theory of everything) which scientists are now working on tries to unite these two groups with one equation which is leading to nasty results and outright worldy refusal in the scientific community.
i don't think that these two groups can ever make a equation which justifies the two groups as one. its like trying to unite the equations of a black hole with a biscuit. they are on two separate paths of thought.
so when i think of this i can only come to one conclusion.
what if general relativity actually CONTROLS quantum mechanics.
lets look at it this way -
If the universe had ONLY quantum mechanics (which other alternate universe's might have) then nothing would be certain. solids would become liquids and vice versa, space-time would be chaotic and non-linear. there couldn't be any conscience in this volistic universe at all.
But if General Relativity was the only force then particles,molecules and any other sub-atomic force would be nullified and matter would not exist at all so this alternate universe would just be nothingness.
But in our Universe, couldn't General Relativity be controlling Quantum Mechanics so that it doesn't go out of control as well as quantum mechanics being an underlying force which has to be there but in a controlled state.
well i haven't heard any other scientists talking about this as they are all to busy fighting their own view.
so are you a quantum mechanic or a general Relativian?
I view myself as both.
So what are your views on this theory (as its obviously theoretical assumption)?
i don't want anybody replying with only critisism and telling me how MY view is all so wrong.
i only want to read OTHER peoples views on the unification of forces and what poeple think of my view as a new approach.
Why do most physicists always team up with one set of rules when it comes to their understanding of science?
on one side you have the General Relativity group. they use real experiments to calculate the world into one equation (due to calculatable Mathematics)
on the other side you have the quantum mechanics group. who work with uncertainties and unresolvable equations. (due to the volistics of science)
The TOE (theory of everything) which scientists are now working on tries to unite these two groups with one equation which is leading to nasty results and outright worldy refusal in the scientific community.
i don't think that these two groups can ever make a equation which justifies the two groups as one. its like trying to unite the equations of a black hole with a biscuit. they are on two separate paths of thought.
so when i think of this i can only come to one conclusion.
what if general relativity actually CONTROLS quantum mechanics.
lets look at it this way -
If the universe had ONLY quantum mechanics (which other alternate universe's might have) then nothing would be certain. solids would become liquids and vice versa, space-time would be chaotic and non-linear. there couldn't be any conscience in this volistic universe at all.
But if General Relativity was the only force then particles,molecules and any other sub-atomic force would be nullified and matter would not exist at all so this alternate universe would just be nothingness.
But in our Universe, couldn't General Relativity be controlling Quantum Mechanics so that it doesn't go out of control as well as quantum mechanics being an underlying force which has to be there but in a controlled state.
well i haven't heard any other scientists talking about this as they are all to busy fighting their own view.
so are you a quantum mechanic or a general Relativian?
I view myself as both.
So what are your views on this theory (as its obviously theoretical assumption)?
i don't want anybody replying with only critisism and telling me how MY view is all so wrong.
i only want to read OTHER peoples views on the unification of forces and what poeple think of my view as a new approach.