Relation between adiabatic approximation and imaginary time

In summary, there are two different descriptions for interacting Green's function, one in QFT and one in quantum many body systems. The connection between the two is that QFT assumes zero temperature while quantum many body systems involve interactions of many particles at finite temperature. To understand this connection better, one can study thermal quantum field theory and its formalism of expectation values over states, which can also be interpreted as a scattering process in time. A good starting point for studying this topic is the Wikipedia page on thermal quantum field theory and a dissertation by Yuhao Yang.
  • #1
taishizhiqiu
63
4
Regarding interacting green's function, I found two different description:

1. usually in QFT:
[itex]<\Omega|T\{ABC\}|\Omega>=\lim\limits_{T \to \infty(1-i\epsilon)}\frac{<0|T\{A_IB_I U(-T,T)\}|0>}{<0|T\{U(-T,T)\}|0>}[/itex]

2. usually in quantum many body systems:
[itex]<\Omega|T\{ABC\}|\Omega>=\frac{<0|T\{A_IB_I S\}|0>}{<0|T\{S\}|0>}[/itex]
where interaction is switched off at ##T=\pm\infty## (adiabatic approximation)

Is there any connection between the two descriptions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
yes but it will take weeks of study to get there. Basically the difficulty is that ordinary QFT assumes zero temperature (otherwise there is no longer a definition for asymptotic states. QFT at finite temperarure is basically the interaction of many particles so the proper formalism is Statistical Mechanics, more precisely the expectation over states which can be reinterpretated into a scattering process in time (even though there is no "time" in the expectation value) by the substitution
Temperature = imaginary time
 
  • #3
thierrykauf said:
yes but it will take weeks of study to get there. Basically the difficulty is that ordinary QFT assumes zero temperature (otherwise there is no longer a definition for asymptotic states. QFT at finite temperarure is basically the interaction of many particles so the proper formalism is Statistical Mechanics, more precisely the expectation over states which can be reinterpretated into a scattering process in time (even though there is no "time" in the expectation value) by the substitution
Temperature = imaginary time
So can you recommend some materials for me?
 
  • #5
Thermal field theory is a world of its own. Quantum field theory rests on the assumption that you can define an "in" and an "out" state, that is if you go far enough from the interacting region you can speak of an initial unperturbed state and a final state that has been perturbed by the interaction but no longer is. That's because at zero temperature, which is what the vacuum is, you can speak of an unperturbed initial state, but at finite temperature, there are particles everywhere, so the notion of <in|out> with interaction only in between is no longer as simple. Here is a good source for you.
https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/th...issertations/2011/Yuhao Yang Dissertation.pdf
 

Related to Relation between adiabatic approximation and imaginary time

1. What is the adiabatic approximation?

The adiabatic approximation is a method used in quantum mechanics to simplify the calculation of wave functions and energy levels in a system with a time-dependent potential or Hamiltonian. It assumes that the system evolves slowly enough that the wave function can adjust to the changing potential without changing its shape significantly.

2. How does the adiabatic approximation relate to imaginary time?

The adiabatic approximation can also be expressed in terms of imaginary time, which is a mathematical tool used to simplify certain calculations in quantum mechanics. In this context, imaginary time acts as a fourth dimension, allowing the system to evolve in a way that is easier to calculate and interpret.

3. What is the significance of using imaginary time in the adiabatic approximation?

Using imaginary time allows for the adiabatic approximation to be applied to a wider range of systems and potential shapes, making it a more versatile tool in quantum mechanics. It also simplifies the calculation process and can provide additional insights into the behavior of a system.

4. Can the adiabatic approximation be used for any system?

No, the adiabatic approximation is most suitable for systems with slowly varying potentials. If the potential changes too quickly, the wave function may not be able to adjust and the approximation will break down.

5. Are there any limitations to the adiabatic approximation?

Yes, the adiabatic approximation is not always accurate and may lead to some errors in the calculated energy levels or wave functions. It is important to carefully consider the validity of the approximation in each specific case before using it in calculations.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
601
Replies
7
Views
806
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
684
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
126
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
1
Views
716
Back
Top