Prove Inequality: $\frac{1}{2}$ Bound w/ x,y,z>0

  • MHB
  • Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Inequality
In summary, the conversation discusses an inequality involving positive variables x, y, z and their product xyz=1. The author proposes a proof using the AM-GM inequality and the symmetry of the expression. However, it is not clear how the symmetry alone is sufficient to prove the maximum value of 1/2.
  • #1
Albert1
1,221
0
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Re: Prove an inequality

Albert said:
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$

It is quite evident the intrinsic symmetry of the expression, in the sense that x, y and z can be swapped and nothing change. Thqat suggests that it must be x=y=z=1 and in this case any memeber of the sum has value $\frac{1}{6}$ so that the sum is $\frac{1}{2}$ which is the maximum of the function with the condition x y z =1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
  • #3
Re: Prove an inequality

Albert said:
x>0 ,y>0 ,z>0 and xyz=1 ,prove :

$ \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}

+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2}$

for using $xyz=1$ and $AM\geq GM$

$\dfrac {z}{z}\times \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}\leq

\dfrac{z}{2(xz+z+1)}----(1)$

$\dfrac{xz}{xz}\times \dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}\leq

\dfrac{xz}{2(xz+z+1)}----(2)$

$\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}\leq \dfrac{1}{2(xz+z+1)}----(3)$

(1)+(2)+(3) the proof is done
 
Last edited:
  • #4
Re: Prove an inequality

chisigma said:
It is quite evident the intrinsic symmetry of the expression, in the sense that x, y and z can be swapped and nothing change. Thqat suggests that it must be x=y=z=1 and in this case any memeber of the sum has value $\frac{1}{6}$ so that the sum is $\frac{1}{2}$ which is the maximum of the function with the condition x y z =1...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
Hello Chisigma,

Your reasoning is not clear to me.
I guess you have implicitly assumed, and not proved, that a maxima exists.
Moreover, even if the existence of a maxima is settled, there may me multiple maximas.
I don't see how the symmetry is sufficient to conclude that $1/2$ is the maximum even if its given that a global maxima exists.
 
  • #5


This inequality can be proven by using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. First, we can rewrite the given expression as:

$\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}=\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1}=\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+(1/x)^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+(1/y)^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+(1/z)^2+1}$

Next, we can apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality:

$\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+y^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+z^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+x^2+1} \leq \dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2+(1/x)^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2+(1/y)^2+1}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2+(1/z)^2+1} \leq \dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{x^2}+\dfrac{1}{y^2}+\dfrac{1}{z^2}+3\right)$

Since $xyz=1$, we can substitute $x=1/y$ and $z=1/x$ into the above expression:

$\dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{(x+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{(y+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{(z+1)^2}+\dfrac{1}{x^2}+\
 

Related to Prove Inequality: $\frac{1}{2}$ Bound w/ x,y,z>0

1. What is the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound in inequality proofs?

The $\frac{1}{2}$ bound refers to the specific value of $\frac{1}{2}$ that is often used as a benchmark in proving inequalities. It is usually used as a starting point to show that a certain expression or function is always greater than or equal to zero, and then the proof continues from there.

2. How is the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound used in inequality proofs?

The $\frac{1}{2}$ bound is typically used to simplify the proof of an inequality by providing a reference point or starting point. It allows for the proof to be broken down into smaller, more manageable steps, making it easier to follow and understand.

3. Can the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound be used for all types of inequalities?

Yes, the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound can be used for all types of inequalities, including strict inequalities, non-strict inequalities, and multiple variable inequalities. However, it may not always be the most efficient or effective method for proving an inequality.

4. Is it necessary to use the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound in inequality proofs?

No, the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound is not always necessary in inequality proofs. It is simply a commonly used tool that can make the proof process easier. There may be other methods or techniques that can be used to prove an inequality without using the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound.

5. Are there any limitations to using the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound in inequality proofs?

Although the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound can be a helpful tool in proving inequalities, it does have some limitations. It may not always be applicable to every inequality and may not always provide the most concise or efficient proof. It is important to consider other methods and techniques in addition to the $\frac{1}{2}$ bound when attempting to prove an inequality.

Similar threads

  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
934
Replies
1
Views
680
  • General Math
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
831
Replies
1
Views
827
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
779
Replies
2
Views
723
Replies
2
Views
815
Replies
3
Views
808
Replies
1
Views
672
Back
Top