- #1
SirEllwood
- 3
- 0
1. The distribution of flaws along the length of an artificial fibre follows a Poisson
process, and the number of flaws in a length L is Po(L[tex]\theta[/tex] ). Very little is known about [tex]\theta[/tex]. The number of flaws in five fibres of lengths 10, 15, 25, 30 and 40 metres were found to be 3, 2, 7, 6, 10 respectively. Find the predictive distribution for the number of flaws in another piece of length 60 metres.
Attempt: Well I think i need to find the maximum likelihood estimator first? which is:
l(L[tex]\theta[/tex]) = [tex]\prod[/tex] Po(ni, LiL[tex]\theta[/tex])
But i get a little bit confused when doing this, as i am taking the product of the 5 terms because L changes every time.
So am i right in thinking that i would multiply them together so the exponential term would be exp{-120}
Then i get confused with the next term, because i am used to working with an L value that would not change because L has 1 value. So now i have:
(10)^3 * (15)^2... etc
Have i gone about this right?
process, and the number of flaws in a length L is Po(L[tex]\theta[/tex] ). Very little is known about [tex]\theta[/tex]. The number of flaws in five fibres of lengths 10, 15, 25, 30 and 40 metres were found to be 3, 2, 7, 6, 10 respectively. Find the predictive distribution for the number of flaws in another piece of length 60 metres.
Attempt: Well I think i need to find the maximum likelihood estimator first? which is:
l(L[tex]\theta[/tex]) = [tex]\prod[/tex] Po(ni, LiL[tex]\theta[/tex])
But i get a little bit confused when doing this, as i am taking the product of the 5 terms because L changes every time.
So am i right in thinking that i would multiply them together so the exponential term would be exp{-120}
Then i get confused with the next term, because i am used to working with an L value that would not change because L has 1 value. So now i have:
(10)^3 * (15)^2... etc
Have i gone about this right?