Pitchers Learning to Make Better Breaking Pitches with Technology

  • Thread starter BillTre
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Technology
In summary, MLB pitchers are learning how to make breaking pitches better with technological assists. This has resulted in increased strikeouts from breaking pitches.
  • #1
BillTre
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2,486
9,720
Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers are learning how to make breaking pitches better with technological assists. Strikeouts are frequently attributed to increased speed of fast balls, but it seems that there are more strikeouts from breaking pitches. Pitches that are thrown to curve (like curve balls and sliders), making them more difficult to hit, are called breaking pitches.

I have always liked the application of physics to throwing baseballs, especially since I read Ted William's The Science of Hitting when I was young. This is an interesting application of that.

This 538 article describes how, in the last two years or so, pitchers have been able drastically increase the amount their sliders and curves.
Screen Shot 2019-05-23 at 4.27.18 PM.png

This is data from the pitch-tracking era (since 2008), a period defined by new data gathering technology that can measure these things.
They have done this by understanding what they want to do physically with the ball and then using high tech analysis for immediate feedback on their technique.
It has to do with getting the ball to spin more with a optimally aligned axis of spin.

The article also has a great link to a Veritasium video on the Magnus effect which can cause thrown balls to curve.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
Very interesting, thanks for posting that! It looks like pitchers over the past couple of years have been emphasizing horizontal movement more than vertical movement. I wonder why... It seems like vertical drop would do a better job of making the batter's swing miss the ball...
 
  • #3
In my mind (and based a lot on Ted William's book) a lot of successful hitting depends on seeing what the pitched ball does vs. what you are expecting it to do.

Everything happens very quickly (a second or less is my guess), and a decent picture will have several different kinds of pitches he could throw. The more one kind of pitch deviates from the trajectory of other pitches in the pitcher's repertoire, the more the batter will have to correct (very quickly) to hitting the ball in another area of the strike zone.
There are also speed differences between different pitches that can result in misses.
I you look at the little video in the tweet in the article, it compares the trajectories of five different kinds of pitches.

I would expect accentuating these differences would would make pitches harder to hit.
Pitchers try to not telegraph (through their pitching motions) which pitch they are throwing. Batters try to find things they can pick up (earlier is better then later in the delivery motion) in the pitcher's delivery so they can tell what kind of trajectory to expect from the pitch.
Ted Williams was known for figuring out out patterns different pitchers would use in pitch choice.
 
  • #4
Same ball in 2018 as in 2008?? Stitching??
 
  • #5
Certainly could affect how much the ball breaks.
An increase in homers maybe a couple of years ago has been attributed to differences in the ball. People thought the ball was different then, and also measured it. In some way it got changed back.
Perhaps those changes affected how much the ball breaks.
Here's a couple of articles on that from 2017 (#1, #2) on those ball changes, after which, as i undrstand, things were "changed back" and the ball is lke it was. That's about the time of the chnag in the breaking pitches.
But, I still think its the training. Techniques have changed, and there may be other explanations, such as: they are spinning balls faster now (more RPMs) and can increase RPM by using tacky substances on their hands, to change grip interaction with the ball, during release.
 
  • Like
Likes 256bits

1. How can technology help pitchers improve their breaking pitches?

Technology can provide pitchers with real-time feedback on their mechanics, allowing them to make adjustments and refine their breaking pitches. This can be done through motion-capture systems, high-speed cameras, and other tools that analyze a pitcher's movements and release point.

2. What specific technologies are being used to help pitchers improve their breaking pitches?

Some examples of technologies being used include Rapsodo, a pitch tracking system that measures spin rate and movement, and Edgertronic cameras, which capture high-speed video footage of a pitcher's release. Virtual reality training programs and data analytics software are also being utilized.

3. Can technology completely replace traditional methods of coaching for pitchers?

No, technology should be seen as a supplement to traditional coaching methods. While it can provide valuable data and feedback, it is important for pitchers to also receive guidance and instruction from experienced coaches who can help them interpret and apply the information provided by technology.

4. Are there any potential drawbacks to using technology for pitchers' development?

One potential drawback is that pitchers may become over-reliant on technology and lose the ability to make adjustments based on feel and instinct. Additionally, technology can be expensive and not all teams or pitchers may have access to the latest tools and equipment.

5. Is there evidence that pitchers who use technology to improve their breaking pitches see better results on the field?

While there is still ongoing research in this area, early studies have shown that pitchers who use technology to improve their breaking pitches have seen improvements in their spin rate, movement, and overall effectiveness of their pitches. However, it is important to note that individual results may vary and other factors such as practice and coaching also play a significant role in a pitcher's success.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
7K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top