Nuclear Quantum Theory: Neutrons as Waves in Diffusion & Transport

In summary: One should ask a professor who has research or development experience in neutron reaction cross-sections to see what opportunities there are to explore QM applied to cross-sections. Otherwise, it is nice to know, but not necessary for typical lattice physics or core design work.
  • #1
madhisoka
49
5
Hi , in the classical course " nuclear reactor theory we treated neutrons as particles. can we treat neutrons as waves when it comes to diffusion or transport equation ? neutrons flux/ cross-sections ? I googled it and I didn't find enough info. Like there a lot of common terms between quantum mechanics theory and reactor theory.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Quantum mechanics is used on the level of individual interactions between neutrons and nuclei. In addition to experiment, QM is used to determine microscopic cross-sections, particularly for resonance scattering and absorption. In diffusion and transport theory, we use the macroscopic cross-sections (product of atomic density and microscopic cross-sections) and fluxes (and currents), so we don't explicitly use QM. The flux (or current) treat neutrons as a large population of which some fraction in each energy range will undergo some reaction, e.g., absorption or scattering. Scattering means that a fraction of one energy group will move into another energy group, usually downward for neutrons not in kinetic (thermal) equilibrium with their environment.

One sees discussions of QM in textbooks on nuclear physics, e.g., Kenneth Crane's Introductory Nuclear Physics, Chapter 11, Nuclear Reactions, and Chapter 12, Neutron Physics, or John Lamarsh's, Nuclear Reactor Theory, Chapter 2.
 
  • #3
Astronuc said:
Quantum mechanics is used on the level of individual interactions between neutrons and nuclei. In addition to experiment, QM is used to determine microscopic cross-sections, particularly for resonance scattering and absorption. In diffusion and transport theory, we use the macroscopic cross-sections (product of atomic density and microscopic cross-sections) and fluxes (and currents), so we don't explicitly use QM. The flux (or current) treat neutrons as a large population of which some fraction in each energy range will undergo some reaction, e.g., absorption or scattering. Scattering means that a fraction of one energy group will move into another energy group, usually downward for neutrons not in kinetic (thermal) equilibrium with their environment.

One sees discussions of QM in textbooks on nuclear physics, e.g., Kenneth Crane's Introductory Nuclear Physics, Chapter 11, Nuclear Reactions, and Chapter 12, Neutron Physics, or John Lamarsh's, Nuclear Reactor Theory, Chapter 2.
thank you sir for the great info. in James Duderstadt book we treat neutrons as particle why don't we treat them as a wave ? does that make a difference ? is it worth the effort to do some kind of quantum mechanics neutrons research stuff " noticing that I am a nuclear engineering student "
https://www.amazon.com/Nuclear-Reactor-Analysis-James-Duderstadt/dp/0471223638
 
  • #4
madhisoka said:
thank you sir for the great info. in James Duderstadt book we treat neutrons as particle why don't we treat them as a wave ? does that make a difference ? is it worth the effort to do some kind of quantum mechanics neutrons research stuff " noticing that I am a nuclear engineering student "
Is one referring to Duderstadt and Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, or some other text?

D&H gives a superficial mention of QM in Chapter 2, however, it is not necessary for a nuclear engineer to know QM at the level at which microscopic cross-sections are developed, since that is already done. At most, one must know how to do lattice calculations and then how to use the results in core simulations codes.

At the points of specific neutron-nuclei interactions, that research is more the role of a nuclear physicist. I'm of the opinion that it is useful for a nuclear engineer to understand the physics.
 
  • #5
Astronuc said:
Is one referring to Duderstadt and Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, or some other text?

D&H gives a superficial mention of QM in Chapter 2, however, it is not necessary for a nuclear engineer to know QM at the level at which microscopic cross-sections are developed, since that is already done. At most, one must know how to do lattice calculations and then how to use the results in core simulations codes.

At the points of specific neutron-nuclei interactions, that research is more the role of a nuclear physicist. I'm of the opinion that it is useful for a nuclear engineer to understand the physics.
Everything is worth it when it comes to science but do I have to put some time and effort in such a field or its just waste of time ? and I will end up circling in a closed loop ?
 
  • #6
madhisoka said:
Everything is worth it when it comes to science but do I have to put some time and effort in such a field or its just waste of time ? and I will end up circling in a closed loop ?
One should ask a professor who has research or development experience in neutron reaction cross-sections to see what opportunities there are to explore QM applied to cross-sections. Otherwise, it is nice to know, but not necessary for typical lattice physics or core design work. I can ask some folks at work if they see some opportunities.
 
  • #7
Astronuc said:
One should ask a professor who has research or development experience in neutron reaction cross-sections to see what opportunities there are to explore QM applied to cross-sections. Otherwise, it is nice to know, but not necessary for typical lattice physics or core design work. I can ask some folks at work if they see some opportunities.
Thank you sir, yes please do because all my profs are either thermal hydraulics researchers or materials science ones
 
  • #8
Astronuc I'm curious... if you don't mind me asking are you working in private sector? I am wondering the extent to which you can pursue your own research/projects in the nuclear private sector.
 
  • #9
pierce15 said:
Astronuc I'm curious... if you don't mind me asking are you working in private sector?
I work for a government-sponsored research organization, mainly in the areas of nuclear materials and analysis. I worked in private industry for 26+ years.

pierce15 said:
I am wondering the extent to which you can pursue your own research/projects in the nuclear private sector.
What kind of projects? Small projects, particularly those that can be realized in the short term, i.e., have immediate application are feasible. More complicated projects are more difficult to accomplish. Opportunities often depend on one's reputation and breadth of contacts.
 
  • #10
Astronuc said:
I work for a government-sponsored research organization, mainly in the areas of nuclear materials and analysis. I worked in private industry for 26+ years.

What kind of projects? Small projects, particularly those that can be realized in the short term, i.e., have immediate application are feasible. More complicated projects are more difficult to accomplish. Opportunities often depend on one's reputation and breadth of contacts.

Thanks for the reply, that's pretty useful information.
 
  • #11
madhisoka said:
Thank you sir, yes please do because all my profs are either thermal hydraulics researchers or materials science ones
I talked with a colleague, and he mentioned that he doesn't encounter any QM in his work. However, he suggested that QM is addressed in cross-section development, possibly in the NJOY code. I believe QM treatment is used in the development of various cross section libraries that lattice codes use. Usually, those involved in core design only need to know how to set up the lattice code and core simulator, and that does not require knowledge of QM.

The folks who establish cross-section data/libraries may use QM. Those who develop the software to process cross-section data use some QM treatment.

I found the following reference, but not all information is available. One, or rather, one's university would have to purchase a rather expensive books or set of books on nuclear reactor theory.

At high energies, the wavelengths of neutrons are small, and it is reasonable to treat scattering as classical collisions between particles. At thermal energies, however, the wavelengths of neutrons approach the size of molecules and the sapceing of the crystalline lattices. Scattering becomes a quantum mechanical problem. The theory for this was worked out in the late 1950s and is described in detail by Williams (1966). This theory was reduced to practice for the US Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF) in the 1960s, mainly by researchers at General Atomi (Koppel and Houston 1978). This theoretical basis remains largely valid today except for the improvements in scope and detail allowed by modern computing machines (MacFarlane 1994; Mattes and Keinert 2005).
Ref: https://books.google.com/books?id=pu9BWuf2gdkC&pg=191#v=onepage&q&f=false

Unfortunately, the book preview doesn't show the references.
 
  • #12
Astronuc said:
d in cross-section development, possibly in the NJ
Astronuc said:
I talked with a colleague, and he mentioned that he doesn't encounter any QM in his work. However, he suggested that QM is addressed in cross-section development, possibly in the NJOY code. I believe QM treatment is used in the development of various cross section libraries that lattice codes use. Usually, those involved in core design only need to know how to set up the lattice code and core simulator, and that does not require knowledge of QM.

The folks who establish cross-section data/libraries may use QM. Those who develop the software to process cross-section data use some QM treatment.

I found the following reference, but not all information is available. One, or rather, one's university would have to purchase a rather expensive books or set of books on nuclear reactor theory.Ref: https://books.google.com/books?id=pu9BWuf2gdkC&pg=191#v=onepage&q&f=false

Unfortunately, the book preview doesn't show the references.
Thank you sir for the info I got 2 questions. First one according to what was mentioned in that book neutrons at thermal energies can become quantum mechanical problem we as nuclear engineers are mostly interested in thermal neutrons therefore understanding quantum mechanics behaviour may help a lot right ? , second question which is kida naive from your own legendary experience sir do you think that it's worth the time to get into such a research ?
 

Related to Nuclear Quantum Theory: Neutrons as Waves in Diffusion & Transport

1. What is Nuclear Quantum Theory?

Nuclear Quantum Theory is a branch of physics that studies the behavior of neutrons, protons, and other particles found in the nucleus of an atom. It combines principles from nuclear physics and quantum mechanics to understand the properties and interactions of these subatomic particles.

2. How do neutrons behave as waves in diffusion and transport?

In Nuclear Quantum Theory, neutrons are described as both particles and waves. When they are moving, they exhibit wave-like behavior, similar to other subatomic particles. This means that they can diffract, reflect, and interfere with each other, which affects their transport and diffusion through materials.

3. What is the significance of neutron diffusion and transport?

Neutron diffusion and transport play a crucial role in nuclear reactors and other nuclear processes. They determine the rate at which neutrons are absorbed and released, which affects the overall energy production and efficiency of nuclear reactions. Understanding and controlling these processes is essential for safe and efficient nuclear technology.

4. How does Nuclear Quantum Theory explain nuclear reactions?

Nuclear Quantum Theory provides a theoretical framework for understanding the behavior of particles in nuclear reactions. It takes into account the quantum nature of particles and their interactions, allowing scientists to predict and explain the outcomes of nuclear reactions.

5. What are the practical applications of Nuclear Quantum Theory?

Nuclear Quantum Theory has numerous practical applications, including nuclear energy production, nuclear medicine, and materials science. It also plays a role in understanding the structure of nuclei and developing new technologies for studying and manipulating subatomic particles.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
0
Views
128
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
13
Views
731
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
267
Back
Top